ON
← Back to feed
India rejects Pakistan’s allegations regarding collision of Indian, Pak ships in Arabian Sea
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter

India rejects Pakistan’s allegations regarding collision of Indian, Pak ships in Arabian Sea

India has rejected Pakistan's allegations regarding a collision between an Indian Navy warship and a Pakistani naval vessel in the Arabian Sea. On September 16, 2026, New Delhi summoned Pakistan's Chargé d'Affaires and lodged a formal protest over the 'unacceptable conduct' by the Pakistan Navy vessel. According to Indian authorities, the incident occurred on September 15 when the Pakistani ship Hunain approached an Indian Navy warship, INS Kolkata, during a routine surveillance mission. The Indian side accused the Pakistani vessel of violating maritime protocols and international regulations, including the 1991 agreement on military maneuvers. The Indian spokesperson emphasized that the collision did not cause significant damage to the Indian ship and reiterated the need for Pakistan to adhere to agreed-upon rules to prevent future incidents.

India has dismissed Pakistan’s claims surrounding a maritime collision involving an Indian Navy warship and a Pakistani vessel in the Arabian Sea. On September 16, New Delhi summoned the Pakistani Chargé d'Affaires and formally protested the “unacceptable conduct” by the Pakistan Navy ship, which resulted in the incident. The collision occurred on September 15 when the Pakistani naval vessel PNS Hunain approached the Indian Navy’s INS Kolkata during its routine surveillance mission in the north Arabian Sea. According to Indian officials, the PNS Hunain executed a “dangerous overtaking manoeuvre” that violated both bilateral agreements and international maritime rules. Indian authorities stated that the incident did not cause significant damage to the INS Kolkata, which remains operational at sea. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal noted that the Pakistani vessel’s actions were in breach of the 1991 agreement on military exercises and the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea. He emphasized that India had already conveyed its concerns to Pakistan, urging greater caution to avoid similar occurrences. Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry previously claimed the incident followed an “unacceptable action” by the Indian vessel within its Exclusive Economic Zone. However, India refuted these allegations, calling them “insinuations” and accusing Pakistan of engaging in “usual prevarication.” Officials reiterated that the PNS Hunain returned to port with substantial damage, though specific details remain undisclosed.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 78
India rejects Pakistan’s allegations regarding collision of Indian, Pak ships in Arabian Sea

India has rejected Pakistan's allegations regarding a collision between an Indian Navy warship and a Pakistani naval vessel in the Arabian Sea. On September 16, 2026, New Delhi summoned Pakistan's Chargé d'Affaires and lodged a formal protest over the 'unacceptable conduct' by the Pakistan Navy vessel. According to Indian authorities, the incident occurred on September 15 when the Pakistani ship Hunain approached an Indian Navy warship, INS Kolkata, during a routine surveillance mission. The Indian side accused the Pakistani vessel of violating maritime protocols and international regulations, including the 1991 agreement on military maneuvers. The Indian spokesperson emphasized that the collision did not cause significant damage to the Indian ship and reiterated the need for Pakistan to adhere to agreed-upon rules to prevent future incidents.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the dispute, quoting Indian officials who accuse Pakistan of violating maritime protocols and Pakistan's claim that the incident followed provocative actions by the Indian vessel. While the tone leans slightly toward India's perspective by emphasizing the violation

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information from the Indian government's perspective, including statements from the MEA spokesperson and specific details about the incident such as the date, location, and the involved vessels. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that the collision occurred and t

Why objectivity (78): The tone remains professional and diplomatic, presenting the Indian government's position without overt emotional language. However, there is some subtle framing that emphasizes the 'usual prevarication' of Pakistan, which may slightly lean towards an Indian perspective.

The Print logoThe PrintIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 55
Huge dent on PNS Hunain after collision with Indian Navy ship in Arabian Sea, returns to harbour

The Pakistani naval vessel PNS Hunain sustained significant damage after colliding with an Indian Navy ship in the Arabian Sea. The incident occurred during routine operations in international waters, leading to the damaged ship returning to port for repairs. Details regarding the cause of the collision, responsibility for the incident, and any diplomatic implications remain unclear at this time.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a military incident between two national navies but does not take a clear stance on fault, responsibility, or geopolitical implications. It presents the event factually without overtly favoring either side, maintaining a balanced tone.

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (55): The article has a more journalistic style but lacks balance by focusing solely on the outcome of the collision without mentioning the broader diplomatic context or perspectives from either side. The phrasing suggests a focus on the event rather than a balanced report.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories