A series of controversial statements made by Spanish influencers has sparked widespread backlash on social media platforms, with critics accusing them of perpetuating harmful stereotypes and failing to engage meaningfully with societal issues. The controversy reached its peak in August, when several figures known for their large followings were criticized for making remarks deemed sexist, racist, and classist during live streams and video content. These comments came amid growing public frustration over the perceived disconnect between online personalities and the realities faced by many ordinary citizens. The situation escalated after the fast-food chain Burger King decided to terminate its collaboration with streamer El Xokas following his inflammatory remarks. In a live session, Xokas had claimed that he earned more in a single promotional campaign than someone’s parents could make in twenty years of work. This statement was widely condemned as both classist and dismissive of hard labor. Similarly, influencer Lucía Sánchez, who gained fame through reality TV shows, made a comment suggesting that workers in her hometown preferred informal employment, which drew sharp criticism for reinforcing negative stereotypes about working-class communities. Other influencers, such as Carlos García, known as Carliyo el Nervio, contributed to the discourse by mocking individuals who sought to view the solar eclipse using certified glasses. His remarks, along with those of other creators like Violeta Mangriñán and Amadeo Llados, whose legal troubles include allegations of fraud and hate crimes, were interpreted as further evidence of a broader trend of insensitivity toward social concerns. Meanwhile, some influencers who have not publicly aligned themselves with feminist movements used the eclipse debate to promote racist narratives, particularly in response to the migration crisis in Ceuta. The month of August saw a surge in discussions around the phrase “la caída de los influencers,” which began trending on TikTok and other platforms. Users shared analyses, critiques, and even republished videos that highlighted questionable content from the past few years. Comedian Marc Biarnés, known under the handle @nosoloviernes2, commented on the shift in public sentiment, noting that while a complete collapse of the influencer industry might not occur, there is a clear deterioration in the quality of content that prioritizes personal indulgence over meaningful engagement. He described this phenomenon as a form of “la vida no va conmigo”, a lifestyle that emphasizes self-interest over collective responsibility. Biarnés pointed out that certain segments within the influencer community, particularly those focused on lifestyle and consumerism, have been increasingly scrutinized for their lack of political awareness and social accountability. He emphasized that these creators often operate as if they exist in isolation, generating content that reflects a disconnection from the real-world challenges faced by their audience. According to him, this detachment is partly due to the financial incentives that allow young creators to afford luxuries, including multiple homes, despite their relatively short time in the industry. In addition to the critique of individual influencers, there has been a broader call for greater authenticity and relevance in content creation. Some creators have joined the conversation, highlighting how the days when it was acceptable for high-profile figures to ignore social context have come to an end. They argue that the current model, which often revolves around superficial relationships and curated lifestyles, has created an ecosystem reminiscent of cliques or exclusive groups, where recognition is based more on visibility than merit.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
Spain
