ON
← Back to feed
In my many years as a court reporter, THIS was the 'most dangerous, evil man' I ever laid eyes on: STEPHEN WRIGHT tells new On The Case podcast about the 'sadistic' double murder that will never leave him
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive3 hr. ago

In my many years as a court reporter, THIS was the 'most dangerous, evil man' I ever laid eyes on: STEPHEN WRIGHT tells new On The Case podcast about the 'sadistic' double murder that will never leave him

In an episode of the On The Case podcast, Stephen Wright, a former crime editor for the Daily Mail, recounts his experience covering the brutal murders of two sex workers, Sumarti Ningsih and Seneng Mujiasih, by Rurik Jutting, a British banker based in Hong Kong. Jutting, who was 29 at the time, allegedly tortured Ningsih over several days while under the influence of cocaine and alcohol, recorded the abuse on his phone, and later called police after hallucinating armed officers outside his apartment. When authorities arrived, they found Ningsih's body in a suitcase and Mujiasih's body in a bloody heap. During the trial, Wright described witnessing Jutting's apparent enjoyment of the violence, stating he seemed to be 'meditating in the dock.' Jutting, who had a privileged background including private education and a first-class degree from Cambridge, argued his drug use mitigated his criminal responsibility, but the court rejected this defense. Wright suggested Jutting's drug use might have prevented further harm.

A couple has been found guilty of murdering a vulnerable man after subjecting him to prolonged abuse, starvation, and physical assaults while he lived under their care. Melanie James, 63, and Kenneth Newton, 57, were convicted of murder at Stafford Crown Court following a seven-week trial. Jurors deliberated for nearly ten hours before delivering the verdict, which marks the culmination of a harrowing case involving severe neglect and cruelty toward Rubin Blount, a 28-year-old man with learning difficulties. Rubin Blount had been placed in the care of James and Newton by social services in 2015, after concerns arose regarding his welfare at home. His parents, Eric and Jeanette Blount, testified that they had initially believed the arrangement would provide stability for their son. However, the situation deteriorated significantly over time. According to the prosecution, the couple exploited Blount for their own financial gain, treating him with extreme cruelty and mocking him regularly. Evidence presented in court included video recordings showing Blount, who was described as resembling a "bag of bones," being subjected to verbal abuse and threats. In one clip, Newton filmed Blount standing in the doorway of their bedroom, where he was called derogatory names such as "nonce" and "f**** spastic." James reportedly joked about sending the footage to a television show titled You've Been Framed. Blount’s condition worsened dramatically, with reports indicating he had lost significant weight, suffered multiple fractures, and endured cigarette burns. His father, Eric Blount, recounted how he discovered the severity of his son’s plight when James unexpectedly visited their home in late November 2022. She informed Jeanette that Rubin was unwell, prompting the couple to visit him. They were horrified by what they saw and immediately took him to the hospital. During the trial, Blount gave testimony behind a screen, describing the state of his son when he found him. He stated that Rubin was unconscious, lying on his side, and covered in urine-soaked clothing. Blount recounted carrying his son downstairs and driving him to the hospital, where he suffered a cardiac arrest. He also mentioned that Newton was crying in his bedroom, expressing fear of being blamed for the incident. The prosecution emphasized that the couple’s treatment of Blount was far worse than their treatment of their pet dog. Prosecutor Jennifer Josephs KC highlighted that the couple had known Blount since childhood and had been considered part of the family. Despite this, they subjected him to repeated physical and emotional abuse, often for their amusement. The court heard that Blount had been living with his parents until 2015, when social services deemed it inappropriate for him to remain at home. The decision to place him with James and Newton was made with the agreement of both the family and social services. However, the couple allegedly used this arrangement to exploit Blount financially, ensuring he remained dependent on them for basic necessities. The trial revealed a pattern of neglect and cruelty that spanned several years. Blount’s health declined sharply in the months leading up to his death, with witnesses noting his extreme thinness and visible injuries. The couple’s actions ultimately led to his demise, with the prosecution asserting that they did not merely neglect him but actively assaulted him. Sentencing is scheduled for September 25, when the judge will determine the appropriate punishment for James and Newton. The case has drawn widespread attention due to the severity of the abuse and the tragic outcome for a vulnerable individual placed in the care of others. The conviction underscores the importance of safeguarding individuals with special needs and highlights the potential consequences of exploitation and neglect within the system designed to protect them.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Daily Mail logoDaily MailIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 602 days ago
In my many years as a court reporter, THIS was the 'most dangerous, evil man' I ever laid eyes on: STEPHEN WRIGHT tells new On The Case podcast about the 'sadistic' double murder that will never leave him

In an episode of the On The Case podcast, Stephen Wright, a former crime editor for the Daily Mail, recounts his experience covering the brutal murders of two sex workers, Sumarti Ningsih and Seneng Mujiasih, by Rurik Jutting, a British banker based in Hong Kong. Jutting, who was 29 at the time, allegedly tortured Ningsih over several days while under the influence of cocaine and alcohol, recorded the abuse on his phone, and later called police after hallucinating armed officers outside his apartment. When authorities arrived, they found Ningsih's body in a suitcase and Mujiasih's body in a bloody heap. During the trial, Wright described witnessing Jutting's apparent enjoyment of the violence, stating he seemed to be 'meditating in the dock.' Jutting, who had a privileged background including private education and a first-class degree from Cambridge, argued his drug use mitigated his criminal responsibility, but the court rejected this defense. Wright suggested Jutting's drug use might have prevented further harm.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the perpetrator, Rurik Jutting, as a morally corrupt individual whose actions are portrayed as extreme and abhorrent. The emphasis on the brutality of the crimes, the detailed description of the victim's suffering, and the moral judgment of Jutting reflect a left-leaning narrative

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed accounts of the crimes committed by Rurik Jutting, including specific details such as the victims' names, the nature of the crimes, and quotes from Stephen Wright. These align with general knowledge of the case and are consistent with other reports on the same event. Ho

Why objectivity (60): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'depraved banker', 'drug-fuelled murders', and 'sadistic' to describe the perpetrator. It also includes direct quotes from Stephen Wright that convey strong moral judgment, suggesting a lack of neutrality. While it presents information from the p

The Independent logoThe IndependentIndependentCenter3 hr. ago
Lyra McKee: £20,000 reward offered for information on Derry journalist’s killer

A £20,000 reward has been reoffered by Crimestoppers for information leading to the arrest and conviction of those responsible for the 2019 murder of journalist Lyra McKee in Derry. McKee, 29, was shot during a disturbance in the Creggan area while near police vehicles. Three men—Paul McIntyre, Peter Cavanagh, and Jordan Gareth Devine—were acquitted of her murder in a trial earlier this year, though none have been charged with pulling the trigger. Lyra’s sister, Nichola Corner, has urged an end to the 'culture of silence' in Northern Ireland, where witnesses may hesitate to come forward. The Police Service of Northern Ireland has renewed its appeal for information, supported by Crimestoppers, emphasizing the need for justice for McKee’s family.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual updates on the ongoing investigation into Lyra McKee's murder, including legal outcomes and calls for public assistance. It quotes both law enforcement and family members without overtly favoring any side. The framing is neutral, focusing on the pursuit of justice rather

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories