ON
← Back to feed
In a first, Gauhati HC asks Assam government to pay Rs 2 lakh to woman pushed into Bangladesh
India🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive16 hr. ago

In a first, Gauhati HC asks Assam government to pay Rs 2 lakh to woman pushed into Bangladesh

The Gauhati High Court has ordered the Assam government to compensate a Bengali-origin Muslim woman, Mumtaz Begum, with Rs 2 lakh for illegally expelling her to Bangladesh. This marks the first instance where a court has held the state accountable for violating deportation rules. Begum was declared a 'foreigner' by the Nagaon foreigners tribunal in 2019 due to doubts over her lineage, despite submitting evidence. The High Court criticized the tribunal for acting with 'malice' and ordered a fresh hearing. Despite the court's intervention, Begum was arrested immediately upon appearing before the tribunal and was eventually deported to Bangladesh. The case highlights systemic issues with Assam's citizenship determination process, which has stripped around 130,000 people of their citizenship in recent years, often affecting marginalized communities.

Advertisement

2 reports

Scroll.in logoScroll.inIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 88yesterday
In a first, Gauhati HC asks Assam government to pay Rs 2 lakh to woman pushed into Bangladesh

The Gauhati High Court has ordered the Assam government to compensate a Bengali-origin Muslim woman, Mumtaz Begum, with Rs 2 lakh for illegally expelling her to Bangladesh. This marks the first instance where a court has held the state accountable for violating deportation rules. Begum was declared a 'foreigner' by the Nagaon foreigners tribunal in 2019 due to doubts over her lineage, despite submitting evidence. The High Court criticized the tribunal for acting with 'malice' and ordered a fresh hearing. Despite the court's intervention, Begum was arrested immediately upon appearing before the tribunal and was eventually deported to Bangladesh. The case highlights systemic issues with Assam's citizenship determination process, which has stripped around 130,000 people of their citizenship in recent years, often affecting marginalized communities.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a legal injustice against a marginalized individual, criticizing the Assam government and foreigners tribunals for discriminatory practices. It emphasizes the systemic nature of the problem and portrays the judiciary as a corrective force. While the article does not '

Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details such as the amount of compensation (Rs 2 lakh), the name of the woman (Mumtaz Begum), the involvement of the Gauhati High Court, and the actions of the Nagaon foreigners tribunal. These facts align with what can be reasonably inferred from the cross-source conse

Why objectivity (88): The article presents the information in a largely neutral manner, reporting the court's decision and the actions of various parties involved. It uses terms like 'came down heavily' but does so in a descriptive rather than opinionated way. The tone remains mostly objective despite highlighting the co

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentCenter16 hr. ago
Assam ordered to pay ₹2 lakh to family of woman pushed into Bangladesh: ‘Expelled without information to husband’

The Gauhati High Court has ordered the Assam government to pay ₹2 lakh as interim compensation to the husband of Mumtaz Begum, a Bengali-speaking Muslim woman who was deported to Bangladesh after being declared a foreign national by a foreigners tribunal. This marks the first time a court has mandated financial compensation against the state for such an action. The court emphasized that Begum was expelled without informing her husband or other family members. The ruling also instructed the Assam government to locate Begum in Bangladesh and facilitate her return to India. Begum had previously challenged the tribunal's decision in court, which was overturned and sent back for reconsideration, but she was detained and eventually deported shortly thereafter.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a legal ruling regarding the treatment of a citizen by state authorities, focusing on procedural violations and compensation. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains neutral, emphasizing the court's directive,

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories