The chair of South Africa's Impeachment Committee, Makashule Gana, has submitted a list of potential evidence leaders to Constitutional Legal Services to confirm the availability of senior counsel for the upcoming proceedings. This development comes amid ongoing legal battles involving President Cyril Ramaphosa, whose administration is seeking an interdict to halt the impeachment process until after a judicial review of the independent panel report on the Phala Phala scandal is concluded. The review is anticipated to be heard in September. The legal dispute unfolded in the Western Cape High Court, where a full bench of three judges, André le Grange, Matthew Francis, and Diane Davis, heard arguments over the validity of Ramaphosa's request. President Ramaphosa's legal representative, Advocate Wim Trengove SC, emphasized that while there may be a prima facie case, the central issue revolves around the sufficiency of evidence presented in the panel report. Trengove argued that the report lacked adequate evidence to support its findings, despite acknowledging that the panel considered the president's affidavit. Judge le Grange countered this by noting that the panel report did incorporate the president's affidavit but did not adequately weigh the evidence. He suggested that suggesting a review of the report was unfair, given that it gained prominence only after legal actions initiated by the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and the African Transformation Movement (ATM). Judge Francis addressed concerns about potential harm to the president's reputation, asserting that the Section 89 rule is designed for the benefit of the people of South Africa and must be considered alongside the issue of harm. He questioned how long the matter could be prolonged without providing a definitive statement to the public, indicating that any potential embarrassment would be part of the president's responsibilities. Advocate Anton Katz SC, representing the MK Party, pointed out that the president's request for an injunction was not within the court's jurisdiction. He highlighted that the impeachment committee had already begun its work in May, and the interdict application was filed on June 12. Trengove clarified that the president sought only to halt the hearing of evidence, not the entire process. Advocate Dali Mpofu SC, representing the EFF, challenged the notion of irreparable harm, questioning the speculative nature of the president's claims. He argued that the court should not intervene based on undefined harm, emphasizing the need for clear criteria before taking action. As the court prepares to deliver its judgment by the end of the week, Gana expressed the committee's resolve to continue its proceedings unless a competent court orders otherwise. She noted that the committee had completed preparatory tasks, including appointing evidence leaders and finalizing witness preparations. Despite the legal challenges, the committee remains committed to moving forward with its schedule. The Phala Phala scandal, involving the alleged theft of approximately $580,000 from the president's private game farm in Limpopo, has become a major political crisis during Ramaphosa's tenure. Opposition parties have used this incident to demand greater accountability from the president. However, the ANC has drawn parallels to the previous Nkandla scandal involving former President Jacob Zuma, which significantly impacted the party's performance in the 2016 local elections. According to ANC Johannesburg regional secretary Sasabona Manganye, the Nkandla scandal contributed to the party's loss in the 2016 elections. However, he believes that the current situation surrounding Phala Phala is different, as there are existing mechanisms in place to ensure accountability. Mangayne stated that the ANC's renewal program aims to rebuild public trust in the party and improve service delivery, rather than merely addressing internal challenges. He emphasized that the processes currently underway will determine whether any wrongdoing occurred in relation to the Phala Phala incident.
3 reports
IOL (Independent Online)Party-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 824 days agoThe impeachment committee chair, Makashule Gana, has submitted a list of potential evidence leaders to Constitutional Legal Services to confirm the availability of senior counsel for the impeachment process. This follows the Western Cape High Court reserving judgment on President Cyril Ramaphosa's interdict application, which seeks to halt the impeachment proceedings until after the review of the independent panel report on Phala Phala is heard in September. Ramaphosa's legal team argues that the panel report lacks sufficient evidence to support its findings, while judges emphasized the importance of moving forward with the process for the benefit of the public. The debate centers on whether the court should grant a temporary halt to the impeachment process.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the legal argument regarding the impeachment process and the interdict application. It includes quotes from multiple legal representatives and judges, providing balanced perspectives without overtly favoring any particular side. There is no clear indication of slav
Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about the current status of the impeachment proceedings, including the submission of potential evidence leaders by the Impeachment Committee Chair, Makashule Gana. It references legal arguments presented by both sides, including President Ramaphosa's lawyer,
Why objectivity (82): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the arguments from both the prosecution and defense without overtly favoring either side. However, it does include some emotionally charged language such as 'humiliated,' which slightly affects objectivity. Overall, the reporting remains balanced and
IOL (Independent Online)Party-alignedConservativeFactual 70Objective 256 days ago Reappointment of Dina Pule: a controversial decision by RamaphosaThis letter to the editor criticizes President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to reappoint Dina Pule to the cabinet, highlighting her past controversies involving misuse of state funds for personal travel. The author accuses Ramaphosa of hypocrisy, given his public stance against corruption. The letter urges Ramaphosa to prioritize the nation's interests over political loyalty and suggests amending the constitution to mandate lifestyle audits for politicians to deter corruption. It references past calls for accountability from figures like Jay Naidoo.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the reappointment of Dina Pule as hypocritical and corrupt, criticizing President Ramaphosa's leadership and suggesting constitutional amendments to increase transparency. The tone is strongly critical of current leadership and implies that the ruling party is failing in its anti-
Why factuality (70): The article mentions Dina Pule's past misconduct involving overseas trips at state expense, which is a known issue. However, the claim that Ramaphosa 'preaches good governance' while 'his actions indicate otherwise' is an opinion rather than a fact. The suggestion to amend the constitution for lifes
Why objectivity (25): The article is highly biased, using derogatory terms like 'skelms, cons and shady persons' and questioning Ramaphosa's integrity directly. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, with little attempt at neutrality or balance in presenting the situation.
Mail & GuardianIndependentCenteryesterdayThe ANC's Johannesburg regional secretary, Sasabona Manganye, stated that the 2016 local government election losses were partly due to former President Jacob Zuma's Nkandla scandal, which involved constitutional violations and financial mismanagement. Unlike Nkandla, Manganye argued that President Cyril Ramaphosa's Phala Phala scandal—centered on alleged theft of $580,000 from his game farm—does not pose the same threat to the ANC's 2026 municipal election prospects. While the Nkandla scandal led to legal rulings and public backlash, the Phala Phala issue is currently being addressed through judicial and parliamentary mechanisms, with accountability measures in place. Manganye emphasized that the Phala Phala matter lacks the same level of public outrage and is not being cited as a reason for voters to abandon the ANC.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the Nkandla and Phala Phala scandals without overtly criticizing or defending either. It reports on the ANC's internal assessment of the impact of these scandals on their electoral fortunes, while acknowledging the differing levels of public and institutional response. The
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
ZA
