From enemy to useful idiot: that's how Markeš was seen in the magazine "Mladina" back when he hadn't yet sold out to the post-transition left
The article examines the shifting perception of journalist Janez Markeš within Slovenia’s left-wing media circles, specifically highlighting his relationship with the newspaper Mladina. It notes that while Markeš was previously depicted negatively in satirical cartoons by Mladina during his tenure at the weekly magazine Mag, he has recently been celebrated by the same group as a symbol of freedom of speech after aligning his criticism primarily against Prime Minister Janez Janša and the SDS party. The piece argues this shift reveals instrumentalization, describing Markeš as a 'useful idiot' who is supported only as long as he serves specific political goals. Evidence includes a recent post by publicist Tomaž Štih contrasting old caricatures with current praise, as well as Markeš’s past harsh critiques of figures like Milan Kučan and institutions such as Delo and RTV Slovenija. The author further claims that organizations like the March 8 Institute, which receives foreign funding, now defend Markeš despite his role in promoting misleading narratives regarding a recent parliamentary investigation law.
2 reports
ReporterIndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 20
The article features a statement by Peter Klepec regarding the current state of the political left in Slovenia. He describes the left as absolutely disorganized, weak, ideologically confused, and impotent. The author argues that the right wing paradoxically elevates this 'poor pair' to legitimize itself, labeling all left-wing positions as extreme or cultural Marxism. While noting global failures of leftist movements, he points to local successes such as New York Mayor Mamdani and a mayor in Graz coming from a communist background. The piece concludes that the left requires fundamental renewal because its approach and methods are urgently needed in a complex world.
Bias read (Progressive): The text explicitly defends the political left against criticism from the right, using terms like 'absolutely impotent' to describe the left but framing this as a problem caused by the right's need for legitimacy. It advocates for the necessity of the left's presence ('we urgently need') and critic右
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (20): Extremely biased and polemical. Uses emotionally charged, derogatory language ('absolutely disorganized', 'ideologically confused', 'impotent', 'poor pair'). It explicitly takes a partisan stance defending the left while attacking the right, lacking any neutrality or balance.
The article examines the shifting perception of journalist Janez Markeš within Slovenia’s left-wing media circles, specifically highlighting his relationship with the newspaper Mladina. It notes that while Markeš was previously depicted negatively in satirical cartoons by Mladina during his tenure at the weekly magazine Mag, he has recently been celebrated by the same group as a symbol of freedom of speech after aligning his criticism primarily against Prime Minister Janez Janša and the SDS party. The piece argues this shift reveals instrumentalization, describing Markeš as a 'useful idiot' who is supported only as long as he serves specific political goals. Evidence includes a recent post by publicist Tomaž Štih contrasting old caricatures with current praise, as well as Markeš’s past harsh critiques of figures like Milan Kučan and institutions such as Delo and RTV Slovenija. The author further claims that organizations like the March 8 Institute, which receives foreign funding, now defend Markeš despite his role in promoting misleading narratives regarding a recent parliamentary investigation law.
Bias read (Conservative): Uses pejorative terms like 'useful idiot' and 'wind-turners', attributes motives to left-wing groups based on ideological assumptions, and frames their support for Markeš as cynical manipulation rather than genuine solidarity.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.