![[OPINION] Impeachment trial needs correction](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.rappler.com%2Ftachyon%2F2026%2F07%2FTL-IMPEACHMENT-TRIAL-NEEDS-CORRECTION-JUL-9-2026.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
PHThe article critiques the impeachment trial of a Philippine official, arguing that it has been conducted in a manner resembling a judicial proceeding rather than a political process. The author points out that the trial involved elements typically associated with regular courts, such as judicial robes, legal jargon, and procedural rigor, which are inappropriate for an impeachment process. The piece highlights that impeachment is meant to be a political mechanism for assessing the fitness of public officials, not a legal punishment. It criticizes the selection of Senator Chiz Escudero, a lawyer, as presiding officer, suggesting that this decision reflects a judicialization of the process. The article also notes that the trial's proceedings, including the use of criminal court language and procedures, undermine the political nature of impeachment.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the impeachment process as being overly influenced by judicial norms, which the author views as a distortion of the intended political process. The critique leans toward a left-wing perspective by emphasizing the need for transparency, accountability, and adherence to democratic,宪
Why factuality (70): The article contains some factual inaccuracies, particularly in its characterization of the impeachment process. It incorrectly frames the impeachment court as a 'political process' rather than a legal one, which is misleading. It also makes assumptions about the nature of the trial without sufficie
Why objectivity (60): The article exhibits clear bias, criticizing the impeachment court for resembling a Supreme Court and questioning the legitimacy of the process. It uses strong language and presents a subjective opinion rather than remaining neutral.
