ON
← Back to feed
Icac hits paydirt as Reformers’ ‘shit sheets’ are given a very public airing
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive8 days ago

Icac hits paydirt as Reformers’ ‘shit sheets’ are given a very public airing

The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in New South Wales has uncovered a 'shit sheet' document that portrays former police minister David Elliott in an unflattering light, suggesting potential corruption within the NSW Liberal Party. The document, titled 'David Elliot shit sheet.docx,' was compiled by Dylan Whitelaw, a member of the Reformers, a right-wing faction within the Liberal Party. Whitelaw admitted compiling the document at the request of Reformers Christian Ellis and Jeremy Greenwood, who were involved in a PR firm. The document includes references to unflattering articles about Elliott, including his alleged illegal firearm discharge during a training exercise. The ICAC is investigating allegations of undeclared political donations from figures like hotelier Michael O'Hara and fugitive developer Jean Nassif, who allegedly sought to remove critics like Elliott. The case highlights internal factional conflicts within the Liberal Party and raises concerns about the influence of wealthy donors on political decisions.

An independent corruption watchdog in New South Wales has uncovered evidence suggesting that a faction within the state's Liberal party created a detailed dossier accusing a prominent minister of having an extramarital affair. The Independent Commission Against Corruption (Icac) revealed during its third day of hearings into Operation Rosny that the document, dubbed a "shit sheet," targeted former police minister David Elliott. The inquiry is examining allegations that members of a right-wing subgroup known as the Reformers accepted illegal donations to bolster their influence within the party. The Reformers, described as a hard-right faction within the Liberal party, reportedly aimed to push the party toward more conservative positions on issues such as same-sex marriage, abortion, and euthanasia. The group allegedly sought to recruit new members through a process known as "branch stacking," which involves securing donations to expand party membership. This method has raised concerns over potential misuse of political donations. During the hearings, Dylan Whitelaw, a former staffer and associate of the Reformers, testified about the creation of the "David Elliott shit sheet." The document contained claims that Elliott had an affair, which he strongly denies. Under cross-examination, Whitelaw confirmed that no such affair occurred. However, he acknowledged that messages exchanged with Reformers indicated he had been tasked with compiling information on Elliott, including allegations of misconduct related to his role as police minister. Whitelaw stated that the Reformers harbored a deep dislike for Elliott, who belonged to the center-right faction of the party. Despite initially viewing the activities as routine factional conflict, he later believed the documents were prepared at the behest of Jean Nassif, a fugitive property developer linked to the Reformers. The inquiry is also probing whether Nassif's contributions were tied to specific political objectives, such as undermining Elliott's career and removing the former building commissioner, David Chandler. Elliott responded to the allegations by rejecting the claims made by Whitelaw and his associates. He emphasized his long-standing commitment to his wife and expressed willingness to provide his perspective if invited to testify before the commission. His denial underscores the personal nature of the accusations, which could significantly impact his political standing and reputation. The inquiry also delved into the broader implications of the Reformers' activities, highlighting the potential for systemic abuse within the party structure. Counsel assisting the commission, Juliet Curtin, questioned Whitelaw about the connection between the Reformers and the alleged payments made by senior politicians, including the federal opposition leader Angus Taylor. Although Taylor has denied any involvement, the inquiry continues to explore these connections. As the investigation progresses, the focus remains on understanding the extent of the Reformers' influence and the legality of their fundraising practices. The commission aims to determine whether the donations received by the Reformers were indeed illicit and how they may have influenced party dynamics and policy directions. The findings could reshape perceptions of internal party operations and raise critical questions about the integrity of political financing in New South Wales.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

The Guardian (World) logoThe Guardian (World)IndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 858 days ago
Young Liberal power brokers created ‘shit sheet’ on NSW minister accusing him of extramarital affair

During hearings of Operation Rosny, an investigation into alleged corruption within the New South Wales Liberal party, a document referred to as 'David Elliott shit sheet' was presented. This document, created by a group of young conservative power brokers aligned with the Reformers, a faction within the Liberal party, contained allegations that then-minister David Elliott engaged in an extramarital affair. The inquiry is examining claims that the Reformers received illegal donations from Jean Nassif, a fugitive property developer, in exchange for actions aimed at damaging Elliott's career. Dylan Whitelaw, a former Liberal staffer linked to the Reformers, testified that while he initially thought the document reflected standard factional conflict, he later believed it was prepared at Nassif's direction. Elliott denied all accusations and called the accusers 'young boys' and members of the 'religious right.'

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Reformers as a conservative faction engaging in unethical behavior, using terms like 'religious right,' 'factional warfare,' and 'illegal donations.' It highlights the credibility of the accused (Elliott) and presents the Reformers as acting under external influence (Jean Nass

Why factuality (90): The article accurately details the 'shit sheet' on David Elliott and the Reformers' activities. It correctly reports Whitelaw's acceptance that no affair occurred and the Icac's focus on the Reformers' alleged actions.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the facts without taking sides. It focuses on the evidence presented at the Icac hearing without editorializing.

The Guardian (World) logoThe Guardian (World)IndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 758 days ago
Icac hits paydirt as Reformers’ ‘shit sheets’ are given a very public airing

The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in New South Wales has uncovered a 'shit sheet' document that portrays former police minister David Elliott in an unflattering light, suggesting potential corruption within the NSW Liberal Party. The document, titled 'David Elliot shit sheet.docx,' was compiled by Dylan Whitelaw, a member of the Reformers, a right-wing faction within the Liberal Party. Whitelaw admitted compiling the document at the request of Reformers Christian Ellis and Jeremy Greenwood, who were involved in a PR firm. The document includes references to unflattering articles about Elliott, including his alleged illegal firearm discharge during a training exercise. The ICAC is investigating allegations of undeclared political donations from figures like hotelier Michael O'Hara and fugitive developer Jean Nassif, who allegedly sought to remove critics like Elliott. The case highlights internal factional conflicts within the Liberal Party and raises concerns about the influence of wealthy donors on political decisions.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of the Reformers and their alleged misconduct in a negative light, emphasizing the unethical behavior of powerful donors and party factions. The language used suggests a critical stance toward the Reformers and their influence over political processes, aligning with a左

Why factuality (80): The article accurately describes the 'shit sheet' on David Elliott and the Icac's focus on the Reformers. However, it adds context about Michael O'Hara and Jean Nassif that isn't detailed in the primary source, which may slightly reduce its fidelity to the original report.

Why objectivity (75): The article uses terms like 'unflattering portrait' and 'perversion of the system,' which may imply judgment. While it attempts to remain factual, the phrasing introduces a slight leaning toward criticism of the Liberal party.

The Guardian (World) logoThe Guardian (World)IndependentCenterFactual 72Objective 6010 days ago
Senior politicians supported young NSW Liberal power brokers trying to shift party to right, corruption watchdog hears

The Independent Commission Against Corruption (Icac) is investigating allegations of corruption within the New South Wales Liberal party, focusing on a group of young conservative power brokers known as the 'Reformers.' These individuals, including lobbyist Christian Ellis and others, aimed to shift the party further to the right by recruiting Christian conservatives and engaging in 'branch stacking', a practice involving undeclared or excessive donations to grow party membership. Senior politicians reportedly supported these efforts by attending events and facilitating recruitment. The investigation includes potential violations related to prohibited donors, such as hotelier Michael O'Hara and Catholic Schools NSW chief Dallas McInerney. While figures like former Prime Minister Tony Abbott and Senator Matt Canavan are not accused of wrongdoing, the focus remains on whether illegal donations were funneled through companies linked to the Reformers.

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses allegations of corruption and rightward shifts within the Liberal party, it presents the findings of an independent commission without overtly endorsing or condemning specific parties. The framing remains balanced, citing both the actions of the Reformers and the lack of罪

Why factuality (72): The article accurately reports on Operation Rosny and aligns with the primary source document regarding the involvement of figures like Christian Ellis, Robert Assaf, and Jean-Claude Perrottet. It mentions the 'Reformers' and their activities, which are covered in the primary source. However, it omi

Why objectivity (60): While the article remains relatively neutral in its reporting, it uses phrases like 'supported the work of the Reformers' which may imply judgment. There is a slight leaning toward portraying the Reformers as having undue influence, though it doesn't overtly take sides or express personal opinion.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories