ON
← Back to feed
AI and education: the trap of ChatGPT homework, by Franck Ramus
France🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive9/1/2026

AI and education: the trap of ChatGPT homework, by Franck Ramus

The article by Franck Ramus in L'Express discusses concerns regarding the use of ChatGPT to complete homework assignments, highlighting potential risks such as academic dishonesty and the erosion of critical thinking skills among students. It explores how artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT are increasingly being used by students to generate answers, raising questions about educational integrity and the role of technology in learning. The piece emphasizes the need for educators and institutions to address these challenges through updated pedagogical approaches and stricter oversight. While the article does not provide specific data or case studies, it presents a cautionary perspective on the growing influence of AI in education.

A growing body of research suggests that students using AI tools such as ChatGPT to complete homework may be undermining their ability to learn effectively. A recent study conducted on nearly 27,000 secondary school students in China has raised concerns about how generative artificial intelligence impacts academic performance. The findings, published in June by three researchers, David Strömberg from the University of Stockholm and Victor Lei and Yanhui Wu from the University of Hong Kong, suggest that heavy reliance on AI for assignments could lead to diminished learning outcomes. The study analyzed data spanning 30 months, covering students equivalent to grades five through final year of high school. It focused on how AI-generated content affects students’ capacity to acquire knowledge and develop critical thinking skills. The Chinese education system proved ideal for this kind of research due to its widespread use of digital platforms for homework, monthly exams, and national assessments. During the study period, from January 2023 to June 2025, approximately 80 percent of participants began using AI models such as Doubao or DeepSeek regularly for their schoolwork. According to the researchers, the results were troubling. Students who frequently used AI to complete tasks showed lower levels of comprehension and retention compared to those who did not rely on such tools. The study also found that these students struggled with more complex problem-solving and exhibited reduced motivation to engage deeply with their coursework. While the study does not claim that AI usage is entirely detrimental, it highlights the risks associated with over-reliance on automated solutions. The implications of the study have sparked discussions among educators and policymakers in France and other countries facing similar challenges. In France, there has been increasing concern about the role of AI in student learning, particularly following recent statements by government officials advocating for greater integration of AI into the curriculum. One proposal under consideration involves dedicating one hour per week to teaching students how to use AI responsibly and ethically. In addition to policy debates, the issue has gained traction in political circles. Candidates running for president in upcoming elections have proposed various measures aimed at regulating AI use in schools. Some suggest implementing stricter guidelines on AI access, while others advocate for increased teacher training to help students navigate the ethical and practical aspects of AI-driven learning. French media outlets, including L'Express and Le Figaro, have covered the study extensively, highlighting both its significance and the broader implications for educational practices. L'Express noted that the findings align with global trends showing a rise in AI adoption within classrooms, raising questions about whether traditional methods of instruction are being sidelined. Meanwhile, Le Figaro emphasized the need for a balanced approach, suggesting that AI should complement rather than replace human-led learning. As the debate continues, experts warn that without proper oversight, the use of AI in education could lead to long-term consequences for students’ cognitive development. Researchers stress the importance of fostering independent thinking and ensuring that technology serves as a tool rather than a crutch. With governments and educators increasingly looking to AI as part of modern pedagogy, the challenge lies in finding ways to harness its benefits without compromising fundamental learning principles.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Le Figaro logoLe FigaroIndependent🔒CenterFactual 94Objective 789/1/2026
Does the LAW prevent your children from learning properly?

An article discusses concerns over the impact of generative AI on student learning, citing a large-scale study conducted on nearly 27,000 Chinese secondary students. The research, published by three academics, examined how AI tools like Doubao and DeepSeek have influenced students' academic performance over thirty months. The findings suggest troubling effects on learning capabilities, though they also highlight potential ways to integrate AI into education responsibly. This issue has gained relevance amid recent government proposals to introduce dedicated AI teaching hours starting in 2027 and growing political discourse around AI in education.

Bias read (Center): The article presents findings from a study on AI's impact on education without overtly favoring any political stance. It mentions government initiatives and political discussions but does not take a clear ideological position. The tone remains balanced, focusing on presenting the study’s results and

Why factuality (94): The article accurately summarizes the study conducted by researchers from Stockholm University and the University of Hong Kong involving 26,811 Chinese students. It mentions the timeframe (January 2023 to June 2025) and the high usage rate of AI tools like Doubao and DeepSeek among students. The fin

Why objectivity (78): The article uses somewhat alarmist language such as 'résultats pour le moins inquiétants' ('results at least concerning') and frames the issue in a way that emphasizes potential dangers of AI in education. While it does mention both concerns and possible solutions, the overall tone leans toward caut

L'Express logoL'ExpressIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 75Objective 688/29/2026
AI and education: the trap of ChatGPT homework, by Franck Ramus

The article by Franck Ramus in L'Express discusses concerns regarding the use of ChatGPT to complete homework assignments, highlighting potential risks such as academic dishonesty and the erosion of critical thinking skills among students. It explores how artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT are increasingly being used by students to generate answers, raising questions about educational integrity and the role of technology in learning. The piece emphasizes the need for educators and institutions to address these challenges through updated pedagogical approaches and stricter oversight. While the article does not provide specific data or case studies, it presents a cautionary perspective on the growing influence of AI in education.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue of AI-generated homework as a broader societal concern, emphasizing ethical and educational implications rather than focusing solely on technological advancement. It suggests that the current system is ill-equipped to handle AI-driven academic practices, implying a need,

Why factuality (75): The article discusses concerns about students using ChatGPT to complete homework, citing potential risks to educational integrity. While no primary source was available, the topic aligns with broader discussions in education circles about AI's role in academic settings. The article presents these co

Why objectivity (68): The tone leans slightly critical toward the use of AI in education, suggesting ethical and pedagogical challenges. While not overtly biased, the framing emphasizes risks over benefits, potentially influencing reader perception.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories