The article discusses the author's personal experience with undergoing cosmetic treatments such as Botox and under-eye fillers, driven by societal pressures and the influence of social media aesthetics. The author describes feeling disconnected from her own appearance due to constant exposure to idealized images on platforms like Instagram, which led to a form of 'facial dysmorphia.' This phenomenon has prompted a surge in demand for cosmetic procedures among younger individuals, particularly those seeking to resemble the digitally enhanced or AI-generated faces commonly seen online. The article highlights how the pursuit of these aesthetic ideals has become increasingly normalized, with cosmetic surgery clinics noting a growing trend of patients wanting to achieve looks similar to those produced by AI algorithms.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on personal experiences and societal trends related to cosmetic procedures influenced by digital media, rather than directly addressing political issues, policies, or governmental actions. There is no clear ideological framing or bias in the presentation of the topic.
Why factuality (65): The article references a survey by Norstat on behalf of Teoxane, but does not provide full details of the study or cite specific numbers from the primary source document. It mentions 'over half of patients' which aligns with the 52% figure for those under 35, but lacks specificity on other statistic
Why objectivity (45): The tone is highly subjective, focusing on the author's personal experience and using emotionally charged language like 'brainwashed,' 'grubby truth,' and 'facial dysmorphia.' The article frames the issue as a personal struggle influenced by social media, which introduces bias and lacks balance.

![[EDITORIAL] Ang patlang sa retoriko at realidad ni Pangulong Marcos](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.rappler.com%2Ftachyon%2F2026%2F08%2Ffact-check-full-post.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)




