ON
← Back to feed
‘I wanted to yodel’: How renovation transformed three awkward homes
Australia🏛️ PoliticsCenter9/2/2026

‘I wanted to yodel’: How renovation transformed three awkward homes

This article discusses the transformation of three homes through thoughtful renovations, highlighting how architectural design can enhance both aesthetics and functionality. One of the featured projects is the 'Tree Change House,' designed by architect Brian Zulaikha and artist Janet Laurence. The original 1990s homestead, located near Berry, NSW, had outdated features such as bullnose verandahs and rust-colored timber gables. Zulaikha and Laurence redesigned the space, incorporating natural materials and integrating the home with its surrounding landscape. The project received recognition from the Australian Institute of Architects (NSW regional chapter) in the Residential Architecture – Houses (Alterations and Additions) category. The redesign focused on creating a seamless connection between indoor spaces and the garden, using elements like stone flooring, tallow wood, and cascading rock beds.

In September 2026, a pair of architects and artists unveiled a striking transformation of a once-overlooked property near Woodhill Mountain, south of Sydney. The project, dubbed the Tree Change House, has garnered attention for its innovative approach to renovating a 1990-era faux colonial-style homestead. Architect Brian Zulaikha and artist Janet Laurence, both known for their work in modernist and contemporary design, purchased the 20,000-square-metre site after selling their home in Balmain. Their vision was to blend the existing structure's potential with a fresh, natural aesthetic, resulting in a home that now reflects a harmonious balance between old and new. The original property featured a mix of architectural styles, including bullnose verandahs and rust-coloured painted timber gable ends. Upon first inspection, Zulaikha admitted he felt compelled to “yodel” at the sight of the heavy, pine-knotted joinery in the kitchen, which he likened to a Swiss chalet rather than a suitable fit for the Australian climate. However, he quickly recognized the underlying strengths of the home, particularly its high ceilings and the way each room connected to the verandah and subsequently to the garden. Laurence, meanwhile, focused on the garden, seeing elements reminiscent of a Japanese temple in the way rooms interacted with the landscape. The renovation process involved stripping away much of the outdated interior while preserving the structural integrity of the original concrete blockwork and rendered brickwork. New steel roofs were installed over the home’s two interconnected wings, allowing for greater flexibility in layout. The main part of the house was designed to resemble a stream, with stone paving running from the front entrance to the rear terrace. Natural tallow wood was used extensively for joinery, flooring, and rafters, giving the space a rustic yet refined appearance. Zulaikha described the overall aesthetic as having a “nuts-and-berries feel,” a term referencing the exposed materials and textures that evoke the work of notable Sydney architects from the 1960s. This style was further enhanced by integrating Laurence’s artwork into the architecture, with pieces displayed near the front door and extending into the kitchen as part of the splashback. The garden was also redesigned to incorporate native plants alongside existing hydrangeas and roses, creating a more contemporary outdoor space. The Tree Change House has since received recognition from the Australian Institute of Australia (NSW regional chapter), winning a commendation in the Residential Architecture, Houses (Alterations and Additions) category. This acknowledgment highlights the successful integration of form and function, showcasing how even the most unconventional properties can be revitalized through thoughtful design choices. The couple’s decision to move to a more rural setting marked a shift in lifestyle, reflecting broader trends among professionals seeking a balance between urban living and natural surroundings. Their experience underscores the potential for architectural innovation in transforming seemingly impractical spaces into functional, aesthetically pleasing environments. The success of the Tree Change House has sparked interest in similar projects, prompting discussions about the value of adaptive reuse in residential architecture. As more homeowners explore ways to enhance their properties, the lessons learned from this renovation offer insights into achieving harmony between historical structures and modern living needs. The project stands as a testament to the enduring appeal of blending traditional elements with contemporary design principles. By focusing on the inherent qualities of the land and existing structure, Zulaikha and Laurence have created a home that not only meets current standards but also honors the past. Their approach offers a model for future renovations, emphasizing sustainability, connectivity with nature, and the importance of recognizing hidden potential in overlooked properties.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 889/2/2026
‘I wanted to yodel’: How renovation transformed three awkward homes

This article discusses the transformation of three homes through thoughtful renovations, highlighting how architectural design can enhance both aesthetics and functionality. One of the featured projects is the 'Tree Change House,' designed by architect Brian Zulaikha and artist Janet Laurence. The original 1990s homestead, located near Berry, NSW, had outdated features such as bullnose verandahs and rust-colored timber gables. Zulaikha and Laurence redesigned the space, incorporating natural materials and integrating the home with its surrounding landscape. The project received recognition from the Australian Institute of Architects (NSW regional chapter) in the Residential Architecture – Houses (Alterations and Additions) category. The redesign focused on creating a seamless connection between indoor spaces and the garden, using elements like stone flooring, tallow wood, and cascading rock beds.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on architectural design and renovation, which is not inherently politically charged. However, it does touch upon housing and urban development, which can have political implications. The framing remains neutral, presenting the renovation process objectively without overtly favor링

Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the project, mentioning the architects, location, and key design features like the focus on sustainability and the removal of outdated elements. However, it omits specific details about the awards received and does not mention the Wodi Wodi Traditional Land Owners, w

Why objectivity (88): The tone remains largely neutral, presenting both the challenges and successes of the project. It includes direct quotes from the clients, maintaining balance. However, the phrase 'I wanted to yodel' adds a touch of humor, which slightly affects neutrality.

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentCenterFactual 82Objective 859/2/2026
‘I wanted to yodel’: How renovation transformed three awkward homes

This article discusses the transformation of three unconventional homes through thoughtful renovations, highlighting how design trends evolve over time. One notable example is the 'Tree Change House,' originally a 1990s faux colonial-style home with outdated features. Architects Brian Zulaikha and Janet Laurence reimagined the space using natural materials and a focus on integrating the home with its surrounding landscape. The project received recognition from the Australian Institute of Architecture (NSW regional chapter) for its innovative approach to residential architecture. The renovation emphasized open spaces, sustainable materials, and a seamless connection between indoor and outdoor environments.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on architectural transformations and does not engage with political issues, policies, or figures. There is no framing that suggests a political bias; the content remains descriptive and focused on design and aesthetics.

Why factuality (82): This article mirrors much of the content from item 0, providing similar information about the project and its designers. It lacks specific award details and omits the acknowledgment of the Wodi Wodi people. Some repetition occurs, but no major inaccuracies are present.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a balanced tone, quoting the clients and describing the project objectively. However, it repeats some phrases from the previous article, which may reduce originality but doesn't affect neutrality significantly.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories