ON
← Back to feed
How to help more of Hong Kong’s non-Chinese-speaking students reach university
HK🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 days ago

How to help more of Hong Kong’s non-Chinese-speaking students reach university

The article discusses the persistent low admission rate of non-Chinese-speaking (NCS) students into Hong Kong's public universities. Over the past five academic years, approximately 10% of NCS students who took the Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education (DSE) exams were admitted to government-funded undergraduate programs, significantly lower than the 25% admission rate for the general student population. Educators cite three main challenges: poor performance in core mathematics, weaknesses in Chinese-language studies, and a lack of performance targets by schools despite substantial public funding. The admission rate fluctuated slightly between 8.8% and 12.2% over this period but has generally remained below the overall average.

Hong Kong's non-Chinese-speaking students continue to face significant barriers in accessing higher education, according to recent reports. The percentage of these students who took the Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education (DSE) exams and were admitted to the city's public universities has remained consistently low over the past five academic years. Despite efforts to improve outcomes, there is no indication of substantial progress. The issue affects a group of students identified by the government as non-Chinese-speaking (NCS), who often struggle with the language requirements necessary for university entry. Educators familiar with the challenges faced by NCS students have pointed to several key obstacles. High failure rates in core mathematics subjects are a major concern, as many students find the subject particularly difficult. Additionally, deficiencies in Chinese-language studies pose another hurdle, given that proficiency in Chinese is essential for success in local universities. Schools, despite receiving considerable public funding, have been criticized for lacking clear performance targets that could better support these students. Data from the Education Bureau and the University Grants Committee reveals that the average admission rate for NCS students into government-funded undergraduate programs was approximately 10 percent over the last five years. In the 2020-21 academic year, this figure stood at 8.8 percent, slightly rising to 8.9 percent in 2021-22. There was a modest increase to 12.2 percent in 2022-23, followed by a decline to 11.6 percent in the subsequent year and further down to 10.5 percent in 2024-25. These figures highlight a persistent challenge, even as other groups of students see higher admission rates. Comparatively, the overall admission rate for the general student population is significantly higher, with nearly a quarter of all DSE exam takers securing spots in publicly funded universities. This disparity underscores the systemic issues facing NCS students, which include both educational and linguistic barriers. Experts suggest that targeted interventions are needed to address these disparities effectively. Schools and educational institutions have been urged to develop clearer performance benchmarks and provide more tailored support for NCS students. Some educators argue that current teaching methods fail to adequately prepare these students for the rigors of university-level coursework, especially in subjects requiring strong analytical skills. Others emphasize the need for improved language instruction, particularly in Chinese, which is a fundamental requirement for university admission in Hong Kong. The situation has sparked discussions among policymakers and educators about potential reforms. Suggestions include increasing resources for language support programs, offering additional tutoring opportunities, and implementing more rigorous assessment systems to identify areas where NCS students require extra assistance. However, there is currently no consensus on the best approach, and implementation of new strategies remains uncertain. As the academic year progresses, stakeholders will be watching closely to see whether any meaningful changes occur. With continued pressure from educators and parents, there is hope that future admissions rates may show improvement. Nonetheless, the current trajectory suggests that without significant intervention, the gap between NCS students and their peers will remain a pressing issue in Hong Kong's education system.

1 reports

South China Morning Post logoSouth China Morning PostIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 907 days ago
How to help more of Hong Kong’s non-Chinese-speaking students reach university

The article discusses the persistent low admission rate of non-Chinese-speaking (NCS) students into Hong Kong's public universities. Over the past five academic years, approximately 10% of NCS students who took the Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education (DSE) exams were admitted to government-funded undergraduate programs, significantly lower than the 25% admission rate for the general student population. Educators cite three main challenges: poor performance in core mathematics, weaknesses in Chinese-language studies, and a lack of performance targets by schools despite substantial public funding. The admission rate fluctuated slightly between 8.8% and 12.2% over this period but has generally remained below the overall average.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data and expert opinions without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It highlights systemic educational challenges faced by a specific demographic without taking sides on policy solutions or attributing blame to specific political entities. The framing is客观

Why factuality (95): The article provides specific statistics and references official sources like the Education Bureau and the University Grants Committee. The percentages and trends described align with what would be expected from cross-source consensus on this topic.

Why objectivity (90): The article presents information in a neutral manner, focusing on statistical trends and expert opinions without overt bias or emotional language.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories