ON
← Back to feed
CBT best way to curb ‘miracle centres’, examination malpractice — WAEC official
NG🏛️ PoliticsCenter8/10/2026

CBT best way to curb ‘miracle centres’, examination malpractice — WAEC official

The West African Examination Council (WAEC) has suggested implementing strict computer-based testing (CBT) to address examination malpractice, commonly referred to as 'miracle centers,' which are alleged to provide unauthorized assistance during exams. An official from WAEC in Makurdi, Timothy Manga, expressed concern over these centers undermining the integrity of public examinations and emphasized the importance of rewarding genuine academic effort. While there is no official confirmation of such centers in Benue State, officials remain vigilant. Teacher Mrs. Rebecca Ezekiel supports the move, arguing that independent examination centers could reduce institutional influence and improve oversight through technology like biometric verification and CCTV. However, local school proprietor Mr. Jude Odeh disputes the labeling of schools as 'miracle centers' unless concrete evidence is presented.

The West African Examinations Council (WAEC) has officially released the 2026 West African Senior School Certificate Examination (WASSCE) results for school candidates. The results were announced on Wednesday via an update on WAEC's official X account, informing candidates that they could now check their scores online after generating or recovering their result checker PIN. Out of the 1,950,726 candidates who sat for the examination, 1,200,514 obtained credits and above in at least five subjects, including English Language and Mathematics, achieving a pass rate of 61.54 percent. This marks a slight decrease from the 62.96 percent pass rate recorded in 2025. The examination, which took place between April 24 and June 19, 2026, saw approximately 1.96 million candidates from over 24,200 secondary schools across Nigeria, Benin Republic, Côte d’Ivoire, and Equatorial Guinea participate. While most centers used the traditional pen-and-paper format, a significantly larger number of schools opted for the computer-based testing (CBT) option. The results were released approximately 45 days after the last paper, aligning with WAEC’s usual schedule. About 1.83 million candidates had their results fully processed and released, while the remaining 116,031 were still undergoing processing. Candidates are required to first generate a Personal Identification Number (PIN) and serial number on the WAEC website (waec.org) before accessing their results on the result-checking portal (waecdirect.org). To do so, they must provide their examination number, National Identification Number (NIN), and contact details for OTP verification. Those who did not receive their PIN during registration can recover it by visiting waec.org, selecting the “Serial Number and PIN” menu, entering their examination number and NIN, and receiving a One-Time Password (OTP) via email or phone. Once the PIN and serial number are obtained, candidates can check their results through the WAEC website, the WAEC Result Checker mobile app, or via SMS. On the website, they should go to waecdirect.org, enter their 10-digit examination number, comprising a 7-digit centre number and a 3-digit candidate number, and select the examination year (2026) and type (School Candidate Result). After inputting their serial number and PIN, they can submit the request, and their result will appear on the screen. Results can also be viewed and downloaded through the WAEC Result Checker app, which is available on the Google Play Store. For those without internet access, candidates can send an SMS formatted as “WAEC ExaminationNumber PIN*ExaminationYear” to the official WAEC SMS number supported by their mobile network. Standard SMS charges apply. WAEC grades range from A1 to F9, with A1, B2, and B3 indicating distinction and merit, C4, C5, and C6 signifying credit passes, D7 and E8 representing ordinary passes below credit level, and F9 denoting failure. For admission into most Nigerian universities, candidates are generally expected to achieve at least five credit passes, including English Language and Mathematics, with C6 being the minimum acceptable credit grade for this purpose. However, the results of 167,486 candidates were withheld due to allegations of examination malpractice. This represents 8.59 percent of the total number of examinees, a decline from the 9.7 percent recorded in 2025. The Head of WAEC Nigeria National Office, Dr. Amos Dangut, attributed the withheld results to the increasing use of mobile phones in examination halls despite a strict ban, as well as organized cheating in some schools. Some supervisors and invigilators who assisted in malpractice were arrested and will face disciplinary action through the relevant state ministries of education. Candidates whose results were withheld are advised to stay calm and avoid panic, as a withheld result does not necessarily mean the entire result has been canceled. They should contact their school principal or examination officer for guidance and use the official WAEC Notice of Examinations Malpractice portal at https://waecinternational.org/complaints to view the reasons for the notice and submit a defense. They should check the portal periodically, especially around four weeks after the results were released, for updates. It is crucial to rely only on official WAEC channels, including its website, verified social media accounts, and local offices, and to avoid paying agents or third parties who claim to offer fast-tracking services, as these are typically scams. Additionally, WAEC disclosed that the results of candidates sponsored by states indebted to the council may remain unreleased until outstanding payments are settled. Affected candidates and parents are urged to rely solely on verified information from WAEC and to refrain from sharing or acting on unverified lists or letters regarding mass-withheld results. The 2026 examination marked the second edition of the Computer-Based WASSCE for School Candidates, following the introduction of the format by WAEC. Innovations such as the Digital Examiner Mark System, serialization of question papers to deter malpractice, and a new portal allowing direct e-PIN generation were implemented to enhance transparency and efficiency. The examination was conducted between April 24 and June 19, 2026, with 102,708 examiners involved in marking across 88 venues. Dangut, who described the briefing as his third and final engagement as WAEC Nigeria National Office head, emphasized that candidates sponsored by indebted states would not see their results released until debts were cleared.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Advertisement

2 reports

The Punch logoThe PunchIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 808/10/2026
CBT best way to curb ‘miracle centres’, examination malpractice — WAEC official

The West African Examination Council (WAEC) has suggested implementing strict computer-based testing (CBT) to address examination malpractice, commonly referred to as 'miracle centers,' which are alleged to provide unauthorized assistance during exams. An official from WAEC in Makurdi, Timothy Manga, expressed concern over these centers undermining the integrity of public examinations and emphasized the importance of rewarding genuine academic effort. While there is no official confirmation of such centers in Benue State, officials remain vigilant. Teacher Mrs. Rebecca Ezekiel supports the move, arguing that independent examination centers could reduce institutional influence and improve oversight through technology like biometric verification and CCTV. However, local school proprietor Mr. Jude Odeh disputes the labeling of schools as 'miracle centers' unless concrete evidence is presented.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of differing perspectives on examination malpractice and proposed solutions. It includes viewpoints from both WAEC officials and educators, without overtly favoring one side. While the issue of examination integrity is politically sensitive, the reporting客观

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports WAEC's call for CBT to curb malpractice, citing Timothy Manga's comments. However, it doesn't mention the primary source document about the complaints portal, which is unrelated to this specific claim. The content aligns with other articles about CBT and malpractice.

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the issue neutrally, quoting officials and mentioning concerns about miracle centres. However, it includes a quote from a teacher suggesting independent centres, which slightly frames the issue as a solution rather than a neutral statement.

Vanguard Nigeria logoVanguard NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 858/10/2026
CBT, best way to curb exam malpractice – WAEC

The West African Examination Council (WAEC) has suggested implementing computer-based testing (CBT) to address examination malpractice, particularly in areas where 'miracle centers', schools allegedly facilitating cheating, are suspected. Officials like Mr. Timothy Manga emphasized that such practices undermine the integrity of the education system and discourage honest academic effort. While some educators, like Mrs. Rebecca Ezekiel, support CBT as a method to increase oversight and reduce school influence over exams, others, such as Mr. Jude Odeh, argue that labeling schools as 'miracle centers' lacks evidence and that financial pressures on families may drive perceptions of such centers. The debate highlights tensions between maintaining exam integrity and addressing systemic issues within the education sector.

Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives on the issue of examination malpractice without overtly favoring one side. It includes viewpoints from WAEC officials, educators, and school proprietors, highlighting both the challenges posed by alleged 'miracle centers' and the economic factors affecting考

Why factuality (75): The article discusses WAEC's call for CBT to curb malpractice but does not mention the new complaints portal for WASSCE 2026 results. It references a specific statement from Mr. Timothy Manga about 'miracle centres' in Benue, which is not mentioned in the primary source document. The content is gene

Why objectivity (85): The article presents both WAEC officials' statements and a teacher's perspective, maintaining a relatively balanced tone. However, it uses terms like 'miracle centres' and describes the issue as a 'threat to the education system,' which may carry some subjective weight.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories