ON
← Back to feed
BJP lawmakers compromised Odisha’s interest by supporting mining law amendments: BJD
India🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives2 hr. ago

BJP lawmakers compromised Odisha’s interest by supporting mining law amendments: BJD

The Biju Janata Dal (BJD), led by MP Santrupt Misra, accused the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of compromising Odisha's financial interests by supporting the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2026. The BJD claims the legislation, which includes Section 9D, effectively removes the state's ability to collect arrears of taxes and levies on mineral resources, potentially depriving Odisha of nearly ₹1 lakh crore. The BJD references an affidavit by Odisha's Advocate General, who stated that these arrears were a legitimate entitlement of the state. They also cite the Odisha Review, an official state publication, which estimates significant financial benefits for Odisha if the Supreme Court's ruling on retrospective taxation is implemented. The BJD argues that the BJP's support for the act contradicts their duty to protect Odisha's interests.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

4 reports

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 703 days ago
Party may move SC if Odisha assembly fails to oppose MMDR amendments: BJD

Senior Biju Janata Dal (BJD) leader Pratap Jena warned that if the Odisha assembly does not oppose the recent amendments to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act (MMDR), his party may take the issue to the Supreme Court. The 2026 MMDR Amendment Act restricts states' ability to tax mineral rights and mineral-bearing lands, transferring more control to the central government. Jena emphasized that the issue affects Odisha's interests, citing a 2024 Supreme Court ruling affirming states' rights to tax mineral rights. The BJD, led by Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik, has criticized the amendment as 'anti-Odisha,' accusing the center of undermining state autonomy over mineral resources. The party plans to push for legislative action within the assembly, engage with other mineral-rich states, and potentially challenge the law in court.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the MMDR amendment as a threat to state autonomy, particularly highlighting Odisha's interests and criticizing the central government's actions. The emphasis on legal challenges and the portrayal of the amendment as 'anti-Odisha' aligns with a left-leaning perspective that priorit

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the statements made by BJD leader Pratap Jena regarding the potential legal action against the MMDR amendments. It references the date of the amendment act and mentions the Supreme Court's 2024 judgment, aligning with cross-source consensus on the content and intent of

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the BJD's stance as a legitimate concern but uses emotionally charged language such as 'mineral tax grab' and frames the issue as a 'blow to federalism,' which introduces a political perspective. While it reports the BJD's position fairly, it lacks neutrality in its overall fram

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentProgressive2 hr. ago
BJP lawmakers compromised Odisha’s interest by supporting mining law amendments: BJD

The Biju Janata Dal (BJD), led by MP Santrupt Misra, accused the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of compromising Odisha's financial interests by supporting the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2026. The BJD claims the legislation, which includes Section 9D, effectively removes the state's ability to collect arrears of taxes and levies on mineral resources, potentially depriving Odisha of nearly ₹1 lakh crore. The BJD references an affidavit by Odisha's Advocate General, who stated that these arrears were a legitimate entitlement of the state. They also cite the Odisha Review, an official state publication, which estimates significant financial benefits for Odisha if the Supreme Court's ruling on retrospective taxation is implemented. The BJD argues that the BJP's support for the act contradicts their duty to protect Odisha's interests.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the BJP's support for the mining law amendments as a betrayal of Odisha's interests, using language like 'compromised,' 'deprive,' and 'not working to protect.' It emphasizes the financial harm to the state and criticizes the BJP for prioritizing national-level policies over local

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentProgressive2 hr. ago
Naveen Patnaik urges BJP MPs to seek reversal of mining Act amendment

Former Odisha Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik wrote to BJP MPs from Odisha urging them to challenge and reverse the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2026. He criticized the rapid passage of the bill in the Lok Sabha with minimal discussion, arguing it negatively impacts Odisha's economy and environment. Patnaik emphasized that the legislation threatens Odisha's mineral resources and control over its land, potentially causing an annual loss of over ₹12,000 crore. He accused BJP lawmakers of compromising Odisha's interests by supporting the amendment and appealed to their conscience, suggesting history will judge them based on their actions for the state's benefit.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a significant injustice against Odisha, using emotionally charged language such as 'black day,' 'injustice,' and 'history will judge.' It emphasizes the negative impact on the state's economy and environment, portraying the BJP's support for the amendment as a failure

India Today logoIndia TodayIndependentProgressiveyesterday
How Naveen Patnaik's mines law pushback puts Odisha's BJP MPs in a spot

Naveen Patnaik, leader of the opposition Biju Janata Dal (BJD) in Odisha, has strongly opposed the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2026, which was passed by the Lok Sabha. Patnaik argues that the legislation threatens Odisha's revenue, control over mineral resources, and the well-being of mining-affected communities. He claims the bill could lead to an annual revenue loss exceeding Rs 12,000 crore and criticizes BJP MPs for supporting the law despite being in power in Odisha. The amendments limit states' ability to tax mineral rights and land, a move that Patnaik frames as a violation of Odisha's sovereignty over its natural resources. He urges BJP MPs to reconsider their support, emphasizing their duty to represent Odisha's interests in Parliament.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the legislation as a threat to Odisha's autonomy and economic sovereignty, using emotionally charged language such as 'black day for Odisha' and highlighting the loss of control over resources. While the article presents Patnaik's arguments objectively, the emphasis on Odisha's 'm

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories