ON
← Back to feed
How Lockheed Martin, Raytheon & BAE Systems are propagandizing children to support war through STEM
United States🏛️ PoliticsProgressive23 days ago

How Lockheed Martin, Raytheon & BAE Systems are propagandizing children to support war through STEM

This article alleges that defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and BAE Systems are using educational initiatives such as STEM programs and youth outreach to promote militarization under the guise of inspiring future careers in science and technology. The piece claims these efforts are part of a broader strategy to normalize war for children and prepare them for roles within the military-industrial complex. It highlights specific examples, such as Raytheon's sponsorship of the Girl Scouts' computer science programs and its involvement in international STEM exhibitions, suggesting that these activities serve dual purposes, educational and ideological. The article criticizes the companies for leveraging their influence to shape young minds toward supporting military interests, despite their global weapon sales and alleged involvement in war crimes.

Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and BAE Systems have been accused of using educational initiatives targeting children to promote militarization under the guise of fostering interest in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). These allegations emerged from investigative reporting by MintPress News, which detailed how these defense contractors are leveraging youth-focused programs to shape public perception and cultivate future generations of military personnel and technologists. According to the report, Raytheon, now known as RTX Corporation, has long invested in STEM education through partnerships with prominent youth organizations. Since 2009, the company has sponsored MATHCOUNTS, a nationwide initiative that offers math enrichment programs and competitive events for middle school students. Additionally, Raytheon launched the MathMovesU program in 2005, aiming to inspire young learners with resources and opportunities in math and science. The company has allocated millions of dollars toward scholarships, grants, and study awards, supporting students, educators, and volunteers across the country. Raytheon's outreach extends to international markets, with its MathAlive! traveling exhibit visiting countries such as Qatar, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia, nations that are major buyers of Raytheon’s advanced weaponry. The company also maintains a longstanding collaboration with the Girl Scouts of the United States of America (GSUSA). In 2017, Raytheon introduced the GSUSA’s first national computer science program and cyber challenge, targeting middle and high school girls. The initiative emphasized empowering young women to enter fields like robotics engineering and cybersecurity. Thomas A. Kennedy, then-Raytheon CEO, expressed optimism about the partnership, stating that the collaboration would help girls envision themselves as leaders in technological advancement. The GSUSA highlighted a former scout who now works at Raytheon as a success story, providing a roadmap for others interested in pursuing similar careers. Furthermore, Raytheon developed the “Think Like a Programmer” project, encouraging girls to engage with artificial intelligence and cybersecurity, and contributed to the creation of programming badges for scouts. The connection between Raytheon and the U.S. military is further evident in the establishment of four STEM “centers of innovation” with the Boys & Girls Clubs of America in locations near military installations. This proximity underscores the integration of civilian education efforts with military objectives. Historically, the scouting movement, founded by Lieutenant-General Robert Baden-Powell, was designed to prepare boys for military service. While modern scouting has evolved beyond its original purpose, critics argue that today’s partnerships between defense firms and youth organizations continue to blur the lines between education and militarization. BAE Systems, another major defense contractor, has similarly engaged in child-oriented activities, such as reading fairy tales to toddlers, which critics claim serves to normalize military values and technologies at an early age. Meanwhile, Lockheed Martin supports children’s math and STEM festivals, promoting engagement with scientific disciplines while indirectly aligning with the broader goals of the military-industrial complex. These actions have drawn attention from advocacy groups and researchers who warn that such strategies may subtly influence young minds to view warfare and technological advancement as intertwined pursuits. As global conflicts persist and the demand for skilled workers in STEM fields grows, the ethical implications of corporate involvement in youth education remain a subject of ongoing debate.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

MintPress News logoMintPress NewsIndependentProgressiveFactual 30Objective 2023 days ago
How Lockheed Martin, Raytheon & BAE Systems are propagandizing children to support war through STEM

This article alleges that defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and BAE Systems are using educational initiatives such as STEM programs and youth outreach to promote militarization under the guise of inspiring future careers in science and technology. The piece claims these efforts are part of a broader strategy to normalize war for children and prepare them for roles within the military-industrial complex. It highlights specific examples, such as Raytheon's sponsorship of the Girl Scouts' computer science programs and its involvement in international STEM exhibitions, suggesting that these activities serve dual purposes, educational and ideological. The article criticizes the companies for leveraging their influence to shape young minds toward supporting military interests, despite their global weapon sales and alleged involvement in war crimes.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of defense contractors as deliberate attempts to manipulate youth education for militaristic ends, using strong language like 'propagandizing,' 'laundering their images,' and 'cogs in the military-industrial complex.' These terms carry a critical tone that aligns with左

Why factuality (30): The article makes numerous factual claims not supported by the primary source document, including allegations that Raytheon is propagandizing children to support war through STEM, which is not mentioned in the original press release. It also incorrectly states that Raytheon is the title sponsor of M

Why objectivity (20): The article uses highly charged and biased language such as 'propagandizing children to support war', 'launder their images', and 'cogs in the military-industrial complex'. It frames Raytheon's STEM initiatives as inherently militaristic and unethical without providing evidence, showing clear bias a

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories