ON
← Back to feed
How India's law on retrospective environmental clearances evolved — and where it stands now
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 hr. ago

How India's law on retrospective environmental clearances evolved — and where it stands now

India's Supreme Court recently ruled against the 2021 executive order that allowed post-facto environmental clearances for development projects, reaffirming the need for prior environmental clearance as mandated by the Environment Protection Act of 1986. The court upheld a 2017 notification that permitted limited exceptions for projects that had already started construction, provided they applied within six months. However, the 2021 order, being an executive directive rather than a formal notification, was deemed invalid. The ruling emphasized that modifications to the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) regime must follow legal procedures, not administrative orders. Projects already approved under either the 2017 notification or the 2021 order remain unaffected, but new applications for retroactive clearances are now prohibited. The decision was prompted by an NGO, Vanashakti, which challenged the legality of the 2021 order.

1 reports

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentCenter5 hr. ago
How India's law on retrospective environmental clearances evolved — and where it stands now

India's Supreme Court recently ruled against the 2021 executive order that allowed post-facto environmental clearances for development projects, reaffirming the need for prior environmental clearance as mandated by the Environment Protection Act of 1986. The court upheld a 2017 notification that permitted limited exceptions for projects that had already started construction, provided they applied within six months. However, the 2021 order, being an executive directive rather than a formal notification, was deemed invalid. The ruling emphasized that modifications to the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) regime must follow legal procedures, not administrative orders. Projects already approved under either the 2017 notification or the 2021 order remain unaffected, but new applications for retroactive clearances are now prohibited. The decision was prompted by an NGO, Vanashakti, which challenged the legality of the 2021 order.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the legal proceedings and does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It explains both the background of the issue and the court's reasoning without taking a stance on the merits of the arguments presented.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories