ON
← Back to feed
How Ferrari lost its sex appeal
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

How Ferrari lost its sex appeal

The article discusses the backlash against Ferrari's first battery-electric model, the Luce, launched in May 2026. The vehicle faced unprecedented negative reactions from the mainstream media and social media users, leading to a decline in Ferrari's stock price. Critics, including former chairman Luca di Montezemolo, criticized the Luce's design and its association with the Pope during its launch event. Ferrari subsequently dismissed its marketing chief. The Luce's high price point and perceived lack of aesthetic appeal contrasted with Ferrari's historical reputation for desirable designs. While the article acknowledges potential commercial success, it highlights concerns about the brand's identity and the impact of the Luce's reception on its market position.

Ferrari, the storied Italian automaker renowned for its high-performance internal combustion and hybrid supercars, found itself facing unprecedented backlash following the unveiling of its first fully electric vehicle, the Luce, in May. The reaction from both the mainstream press and social media users was overwhelmingly negative, leading to a noticeable drop in the company's stock value. The controversy reached a peak on 23 June when Ferrari announced the resignation of its marketing chief, marking a significant shift in the brand's strategy and public perception. The Luce's debut triggered a wave of criticism that extended beyond typical product reviews. Critics lambasted the vehicle's design, comparing it unfavorably to a less expensive Japanese electric car. The launch event, which included an unexpected appearance by the Pope, further fueled the controversy. Public sentiment was divided, with many questioning the purpose and target audience of the Luce. Despite its exorbitant price tag, expected to be around £500,000—the Luce's reception was marred by confusion and disappointment among consumers, even those who had no intention of purchasing the vehicle. The backlash against the Luce highlights a broader issue for Ferrari, whose brand identity has been deeply rooted in the aesthetics and performance of its internal combustion engines. The company's historical success in car design is attributed to the unique industrial landscape of Italy, particularly in the north, where a confluence of trade wealth and craftsmanship fostered a culture of innovation. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, numerous small workshops emerged, specializing in the production of rolling chassis and bodywork. These artisans drew on their expertise from established industries, creating a synergy that propelled the growth of the supercar sector. Italian car designers became adept at crafting vehicles that encapsulated the essence of internal combustion, optimizing them for desirability and theatricality. This legacy has positioned Italian automakers as leaders in automotive design, blending functionality with aesthetic appeal. However, the introduction of the Luce challenges this tradition, as it represents a departure from the internal combustion ethos that has defined Ferrari's image for decades. The controversy surrounding the Luce underscores a pivotal moment for Ferrari, as it navigates the transition towards electrification while maintaining its iconic status. The company faces the challenge of reconciling its heritage with the demands of modern environmental standards and consumer expectations. As the automotive industry shifts towards sustainable technologies, Ferrari must find a balance between preserving its legacy and embracing innovation. The impact of the Luce's reception extends beyond mere aesthetics; it signals a potential shift in how consumers perceive luxury and performance in the context of electric vehicles. While the Luce may achieve commercial success, the negative publicity could affect the brand's overall appeal, particularly among its core demographic. Ferrari's ability to adapt and respond to this feedback will be crucial in determining its future trajectory in the evolving automotive landscape.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

UnHerd logoUnHerdIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 70yesterday
How Ferrari lost its sex appeal

The article discusses the backlash against Ferrari's first battery-electric model, the Luce, launched in May 2026. The vehicle faced unprecedented negative reactions from the mainstream media and social media users, leading to a decline in Ferrari's stock price. Critics, including former chairman Luca di Montezemolo, criticized the Luce's design and its association with the Pope during its launch event. Ferrari subsequently dismissed its marketing chief. The Luce's high price point and perceived lack of aesthetic appeal contrasted with Ferrari's historical reputation for desirable designs. While the article acknowledges potential commercial success, it highlights concerns about the brand's identity and the impact of the Luce's reception on its market position.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of the Luce as a broader cultural and aesthetic shift, suggesting that traditional values and craftsmanship are being undermined by modern, less appealing designs. It emphasizes the emotional and symbolic connection between Ferrari and its heritage, implying that the

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the public reaction to Ferrari's Luce electric vehicle, citing specific details like the negative media coverage, social media backlash, and the departure of Ferrari's marketing chief. It references statements from former chairman Luca di Montezemolo and compares the situation

Why objectivity (70): The tone of the article leans towards a critical perspective, using phrases like 'collective snort of derision' and 'social media vitriol usually reserved for singers,' which may reflect a biased view. The article also frames the controversy as a significant event affecting the brand, suggesting a n

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories