Shany Mor analyzes the shift in behavior among self-described 'Humanitarians'—a group comprising Western NGOs, individuals, and governmental institutions united by their commitment to global and transnational justice—since the October 7 attacks. These actors, who previously emphasized adherence to international humanitarian law, have largely moved toward positions that align with supporting Hamas and opposing Israeli actions. Mor outlines four possible responses to the conflict, ranging from neutrality to active support for Palestinian interests at the expense of Israeli security. He argues that most Humanitarians’ actions align with the third scenario, where they prioritize defeating Israel and limiting its capabilities, while a smaller portion align with the fourth, which involves fostering anti-Israel sentiment and Jewish hatred. Mor questions why concern for humanitarian norms has transformed into support for Islamist groups and a disregard for Palestinian civilian welfare.
Bias read (Progressive): The article critiques the transformation of humanitarian principles into support for Hamas and anti-Israel sentiment, suggesting that the movement has been overtaken by far-left ideologies. The framing emphasizes the alignment of humanitarian actors with H3 and H4 scenarios, which involve opposition
