ON
← Back to feed
'How dare you threaten students': Rahul Gandhi slams DU over Jantar Mantar advisory
India🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive10 days ago

'How dare you threaten students': Rahul Gandhi slams DU over Jantar Mantar advisory

Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, criticized the University of Delhi (DU) for issuing an advisory warning students against participating in demonstrations at Jantar Mantar. The advisory stated that protests at the location are strictly regulated under Supreme Court directives and warned participants of potential legal consequences, risks to personal safety, and negative impacts on academic and professional prospects. Gandhi condemned the advisory as an attempt to intimidate students for exercising their democratic rights, calling out the university for holding them accountable. The protests are linked to allegations of a leaked NEET-UG exam paper, which sparked widespread student unrest. Gandhi and other opposition leaders had previously attempted to hold a demonstration in solidarity with the protesters but faced resistance from Delhi Police.

Mohammad Irfan, a 35-year-old hawker from Delhi’s Sawda JJ Colony, emerged as a symbol of resilience and quiet power during the recent protests at Jantar Mantar. His unexpected yet profound insights into democracy, dignity, and labor rights captivated both journalists and citizens alike, marking him as one of the most compelling figures to emerge from the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) demonstrations. Unlike the more familiar figure of Abhijeet Dipke, the satirical face of the movement, Irfan’s authenticity resonated deeply with the public, making him a unique voice for the unheard masses in India. The moment that captured national attention occurred on July 20, following a crackdown by security forces on the protest site. As the crowd struggled with distress, a man in a blue T-shirt approached Rajat Pandey, a journalist from The Lallantop, and began speaking with remarkable clarity and conviction. Irfan, who had never attended school, shared his understanding of the Indian Constitution, labor rights, and even recited verses from Bhagat Singh’s poetry. His words, delivered without pretense or performance, struck a chord with those present, leaving Pandey emotionally moved and describing the encounter as the best of his career. Irfan’s ability to articulate complex ideas, despite having learned them solely through Google’s voice command feature, left many astonished. Within hours, clips of his speech spread rapidly across social media platforms, sparking discussions about the state of education, labor rights, and the value of grassroots voices in shaping national discourse. His message, rooted in personal struggle and a deep sense of justice, resonated beyond the immediate context of the protest, drawing admiration from journalists, politicians, and ordinary citizens alike. Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, recognized Irfan’s significance and took steps to acknowledge his impact. On July 27, Gandhi visited Irfan at his home in Sawda JJ Colony, engaging directly with him and inviting him to meet with his sister, Priyanka Gandhi, and other leaders. During the visit, Gandhi praised Irfan’s outlook, calling it a reflection of India’s youthful potential. He highlighted the importance of accessible education, healthcare, and democratic rights, emphasizing that individuals like Irfan embodied the nation’s true hope. Beyond the protest site, Irfan’s life reveals a reality that many in urban centers remain unaware of. The Lallantop team, inspired by the viral nature of Irfan’s interview, traveled to his residence in Sawda JJ Colony. What they found was not merely a place of hardship but a space where survival and dignity coexisted. The home, still under construction, lacked basic amenities, yet Irfan maintained a calm and dignified presence. He spoke candidly about his daily earnings of approximately Rs 500, questioning how such income could support a family or allow for basic necessities like clean clothing or medical care. These reflections, drawn from his everyday struggles, underscored the broader challenges faced by millions in the informal sector. Irfan’s commitment to labor rights and educational access has become central to his growing influence. Despite his lack of formal schooling, he consistently emphasized the need for systemic change, advocating for policies that would uplift marginalized communities. His participation in the protests was not driven by political ideology but by a genuine desire to highlight the conditions of the working poor. This sincerity, combined with his ability to communicate effectively, has positioned him as a powerful advocate for those often overlooked in national conversations. As the days pass, Irfan’s story continues to evolve. His interactions with political figures like Rahul Gandhi suggest that his voice may soon extend beyond local activism, potentially influencing policy discussions at higher levels. Yet, for now, Irfan remains grounded in his community, continuing his work as a hawker while using his newfound platform to amplify the concerns of those who share his circumstances. His journey serves as a testament to the transformative power of individual agency and the enduring relevance of grassroots voices in shaping a more equitable society.

4 reports

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 8515 days ago
Pinarayi Vijayan expresses solidarity with protesters at Jantar Mantar

Pinarayi Vijayan, the Leader of the Opposition in Kerala, expressed solidarity with student and youth activists protesting at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi. He supported the demonstrations led by the Cockroach Janta Party, stating they defend democratic rights against what he described as the 'authoritarian rule' of the Sangh Parivar and the Narendra Modi government. Left-wing student organizations such as the Students’ Federation of India (SFI), All India Students’ Federation (AISF), and All India Students’ Association (AISA) participated in the protest. Vijayan praised the hunger strike organized by SFI leaders Adarsh M. Saji and Aishe Ghosh, calling it inspirational for those fighting for democracy. He emphasized the importance of listening to students and engaging in dialogue to address their concerns.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protests as a defense of democratic rights against 'authoritarian rule' by the Modi government and Sangh Parivar, using terms like 'Cockroach Janta Party' which implies criticism of the ruling party. It highlights support from left-wing student groups and emphasizes the need '

Why factuality (90): The article accurately summarizes the Delhi High Court's ruling on Sonam Wangchuk's hospital transfer, citing specific legal arguments and the court's observations. It aligns with other articles and provides detailed legal context.

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the court's decision in a neutral and objective manner, avoiding emotional language and focusing on legal reasoning and procedures.

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 9010 days ago
After DU, JNU asks its students, staff to avoid Jantar Mantar protest site

Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) has issued an advisory asking its students and staff to avoid participating in or visiting gatherings at Jantar Mantar, citing concerns over student safety, legal consequences, and the spread of misinformation. The university emphasized adherence to Supreme Court guidelines on public demonstrations and warned of potential legal repercussions for unauthorized assemblies. This follows a similar advisory from the University of Delhi (DU), which also urged restraint due to heightened security concerns. The move has drawn criticism from Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, who accused JNU of 'threatening' students for exercising their democratic rights. The universities highlight the risks associated with protests, including legal actions, impact on academic careers, and exposure to false information.

Bias read (Center): While the issue involves politically sensitive topics related to student activism and governance, the article presents the universities' official stance without overtly endorsing or opposing specific political positions. The framing remains neutral, focusing on institutional warnings rather than ide

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that JNU has issued an advisory asking students and staff to avoid Jantar Mantar protests, citing safety concerns and legal risks. It references the university's official statement on X and mentions the similar advisory from DU, aligning with cross-source consensus. Th

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the university's directive without expressing opinion or bias. It focuses on reporting the facts as stated by JNU and does not frame the issue in a politically charged manner.

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7010 days ago
'How dare you threaten students': Rahul Gandhi slams DU over Jantar Mantar advisory

Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, criticized the University of Delhi (DU) for issuing an advisory warning students against participating in demonstrations at Jantar Mantar. The advisory stated that protests at the location are strictly regulated under Supreme Court directives and warned participants of potential legal consequences, risks to personal safety, and negative impacts on academic and professional prospects. Gandhi condemned the advisory as an attempt to intimidate students for exercising their democratic rights, calling out the university for holding them accountable. The protests are linked to allegations of a leaked NEET-UG exam paper, which sparked widespread student unrest. Gandhi and other opposition leaders had previously attempted to hold a demonstration in solidarity with the protesters but faced resistance from Delhi Police.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents Rahul Gandhi’s strong criticism of the University of Delhi’s advisory, framing it as an intimidation tactic against students’ democratic rights. The language used by Gandhi, such as 'how dare you threaten students,' emphasizes a clear critique of institutional authority, aligns

Why factuality (85): The article mirrors the content of item 4, detailing the Delhi High Court's consideration of a PIL against the internet shutdown. It provides specific legal details and procedural context, aligning with known facts and legal processes.

Why objectivity (70): Similar to item 4, the article focuses on the legal proceedings and the implications of the internet shutdown. While factual, the emphasis on the court's role may subtly support the protesters' position, affecting perceived neutrality.

The Print logoThe PrintIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 8510 days ago
JNU advises students to stay away from Jantar Mantar protest

The article reports that Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) has advised its students to avoid participating in a protest at Jantar Mantar, a well-known site of political demonstrations in New Delhi. The advice comes amid heightened political tensions and ongoing debates over student activism in India. While the university did not explicitly endorse any particular political stance, the guidance was interpreted by some as a caution against engaging in controversial protests. The situation reflects broader discussions around academic freedom, campus politics, and the role of universities in public discourse.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the university's advisory without overtly endorsing or criticizing the protesters' actions. It focuses on the institutional guidance rather than taking a clear ideological position. However, the context of the protest and the implications of the university's stance suggest a low

Why factuality (60): The article discusses JNU advising students to avoid the protest but provides minimal context about the broader situation involving the CJP, the Supreme Court, or the alleged police actions. It lacks depth regarding the main event being covered.

Why objectivity (85): The article is highly objective, presenting the advisory from JNU without any apparent bias or emotional language. It simply reports the advice given to students.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories