House proposes asset forfeiture for forestry, human trafficking crimes
The Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI) has proposed expanding the scope of asset forfeiture to include 13 criminal offenses such as corruption, forestry crimes, and human trafficking, aiming to complete the legislation by December 15, 2026. Habiburokhman, chairman of Commission III overseeing legal and security matters, acknowledged public concerns about potential misuse of the law against ordinary citizens but emphasized constitutional principles of equality before the law. The proposed bill includes offenses like narcotics, terrorism, environmental crimes, and human trafficking, drawing parallels to similar laws in the UK and US. Habiburokhman warned against arbitrary enforcement and highlighted the need for institutional safeguards to prevent abuse, particularly against corrupt law enforcement. He stressed the importance of maintaining integrity among those enforcing the law.
Indonesia’s legislative body has confirmed that its proposed Asset Forfeiture Bill includes provisions for the seizure of assets derived from corruption, marking a key step in efforts to combat illicit wealth accumulation. Deputy Speaker of the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI), Sufmi Dasco Ahmad, affirmed this during a meeting at the Parliament Complex on Tuesday. According to Dasco, the bill explicitly mandates the confiscation of assets obtained through corruption-related activities. This clarification comes after earlier drafts of the legislation had already addressed corruption-linked asset seizures, though adjustments are still required due to recent changes in Indonesia’s legal framework. Dasco noted that the initial version of the bill predates the adoption of the new Criminal Code (KUHP) and Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). As such, certain elements of the draft need refinement to align with these updated legal standards. Despite this, the House of Representatives remains committed to incorporating public feedback and expert insights to ensure the bill is both effective and equitable. Dasco expressed confidence that the legislative process will culminate by December 15, 2026, allowing sufficient time for necessary revisions and stakeholder engagement. Commission III of the DPR, responsible for overseeing legal, human rights, and security matters, has outlined 13 specific crimes that fall under the scope of the proposed Asset Forfeiture Bill. These range from corruption and narcotics trafficking to terrorism, human smuggling, and environmental violations. Chairman of Commission III, Habiburokhman, highlighted that the inclusion of these offenses mirrors international practices observed in jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom and the United States. However, he cautioned against the potential misuse of the law, emphasizing that asset forfeiture should not be wielded arbitrarily or as a mechanism to target political adversaries or suppress dissent. Habiburokhman reiterated that the proposed law aims to hold all individuals equally accountable under the law, regardless of status or influence. He underscored the constitutional principle of equal treatment, stating that anyone found guilty of violating the law must face appropriate consequences. Under the bill, the list of offenses subject to asset forfeiture extends to taxation violations, banking misconduct, insurance fraud, and crimes within the mining and marine industries. Additionally, the smuggling of weapons, hazardous materials, and the exploitation of human beings through trafficking are also included in the scope of the legislation. Public concerns have been raised regarding the potential impact of the bill on ordinary citizens, prompting calls for robust safeguards to prevent misuse. In response, Habiburokhman emphasized the necessity of establishing a strong institutional framework to monitor the enforcement of the law. He advocated for mechanisms to address instances where law enforcement officers might exploit their positions to unfairly seize assets. Such abuses, he argued, should result in disciplinary, professional, and even criminal repercussions for those involved. The proposed timeline for passing the bill has drawn attention, particularly given the current political climate. Earlier reports indicated that the government, under President Prabowo Subianto, has been urged to accelerate the legislative process. Vice President Gibran Rakabuming has also called for expeditious action on the bill, reflecting broader support among political figures for its swift implementation. Meanwhile, civil society groups continue to scrutinize the bill’s provisions, ensuring they align with principles of justice and transparency. As the debate continues, the focus remains on balancing the need for stringent anti-corruption measures with protections against arbitrary enforcement. With the House of Representatives aiming to finalize the bill by mid-2026, the coming months will see increased scrutiny and dialogue surrounding its implications for both the legal system and the general populace.
3 reports
Tempo (English)IndependentCenterFactual 96Objective 908/31/2026
The Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) has proposed a bill that would allow asset forfeiture for 13 specific crimes. The proposal aims to enhance law enforcement capabilities by enabling authorities to seize assets linked to criminal activities. The bill is part of broader efforts to strengthen legal frameworks against corruption and organized crime. Details of the proposed crimes and the scope of asset seizure remain under discussion within legislative committees.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the proposal as a legislative initiative without overtly endorsing or criticizing the measure. It focuses on the procedural aspect of the bill rather than taking a clear ideological stance. There is no evident slant toward either progressive or conservative interpretations of法治.
Why factuality (96): This article accurately states that the DPR is proposing 13 crimes for inclusion in the Asset Forfeiture Bill, including corruption, forestry crimes, and human trafficking. It also notes the target date of December 15, 2026, and quotes Habiburokhman’s comments on the need for fairness and alignment
Why objectivity (90): The article presents facts objectively, quoting DPR officials without apparent bias. It acknowledges public concerns but does not take sides, maintaining a balanced perspective throughout.
Antara NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 888/31/2026
The Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI) has proposed expanding the scope of asset forfeiture to include 13 criminal offenses such as corruption, forestry crimes, and human trafficking, aiming to complete the legislation by December 15, 2026. Habiburokhman, chairman of Commission III overseeing legal and security matters, acknowledged public concerns about potential misuse of the law against ordinary citizens but emphasized constitutional principles of equality before the law. The proposed bill includes offenses like narcotics, terrorism, environmental crimes, and human trafficking, drawing parallels to similar laws in the UK and US. Habiburokhman warned against arbitrary enforcement and highlighted the need for institutional safeguards to prevent abuse, particularly against corrupt law enforcement. He stressed the importance of maintaining integrity among those enforcing the law.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the proposal as a legislative initiative without overtly endorsing or criticizing specific political factions. While it acknowledges public concerns and emphasizes constitutional principles, it does not take a clear ideological stance. The framing remains balanced, focusing on法治
Why factuality (95): The article correctly identifies the DPR’s proposal to include 13 crimes in the Asset Forfeiture Bill, such as corruption, forestry crimes, and human trafficking. It also notes the deadline of December 15, 2026, and quotes Habiburokhman’s emphasis on constitutional principles and international compa
Why objectivity (88): The article remains largely objective, presenting the views of DPR officials and acknowledging public concerns. However, it places more emphasis on the warnings against arbitrary enforcement, which might slightly tilt toward highlighting risks rather than neutrality.
Antara NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 94Objective 879/1/2026
The Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) has confirmed that the Asset Forfeiture Bill includes provisions for confiscating assets obtained through corruption. Deputy Speaker Sufmi Dasco Ahmad emphasized that if a crime involves corruption, the associated assets will be forfeited. The bill, previously drafted before the enactment of the new Criminal Code (KUHP) and Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), requires adjustments to align with these new laws. The DPR is seeking public input to refine the bill before finalizing it by December 15, 2026. Commission III Chair Habiburokhman noted that the bill covers 13 categories of crimes, including corruption, narcotics, terrorism, and human trafficking, drawing inspiration from legal frameworks in the UK and the US. He cautioned against misuse of the law to target individuals or suppress dissent.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about the Asset Forfeiture Bill in a balanced manner, citing statements from officials and outlining both the scope of the legislation and concerns about potential abuse. It does not take a clear ideological stance but reports on the legislative process and public参与.
Why factuality (94): The article accurately reports that the DPR confirmed the Asset Forfeiture Bill includes corruption-related assets, citing Deputy Speaker Sufmi Dasco Ahmad. It mentions adjustments due to the new KUHP and KUHAP, and references Habiburokhman’s statement about 13 crimes being considered. These details
Why objectivity (87): The article maintains a neutral tone overall, presenting statements from both Dasco and Habiburokhman without overt bias. However, it slightly emphasizes Habiburokhman’s warnings about potential misuse, which may subtly highlight concerns over the bill rather than remaining strictly neutral.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
ID
