A Hong Kong court has convicted two prominent pro-democracy activists for their roles in organizing annual vigils commemorating the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown, finding them guilty of "incitement to subversion" under China’s National Security Law (NSL). Lee Cheuk-yan, 69, and Chow Hang-tung, 41, were among the key figures of the now-defunct Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, which had long led these commemorations. The verdict, delivered by three government-appointed national security judges, marks a significant escalation in the enforcement of the NSL against dissent in Hong Kong. The conviction followed a trial that focused on the activists’ repeated use of the phrase “end one-party dictatorship” during public gatherings. According to the 16-page ruling, this language was deemed sufficient to violate the NSL, even though the defendants did not engage in violent actions or explicitly advocate for forceful change. The judges argued that the activists aimed to undermine public confidence in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and destabilize the region’s political framework. They emphasized that the intent behind the statements, rather than the means used, constituted a breach of the law. Lee and Chow were charged with incitement to subversion of state power, a crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison under the NSL. Both had previously held leadership positions within the Hong Kong Alliance, which had organized annual vigils in memory of the 1989 events for decades. These vigils, once considered a hallmark of Hong Kong’s relative autonomy, became increasingly restricted after the NSL came into effect in June 2020. The law, introduced amid widespread pro-democracy protests in 2019, granted expanded authority to both the central government and local authorities to suppress activities deemed threats to national security. Albert Ho, another former leader of the Hong Kong Alliance and a former chairman of the city’s largest opposition party, pleaded guilty earlier to the same charge. He had also been a central figure in the organization’s efforts to commemorate the Tiananmen events annually. His case, however, was resolved through a plea deal, whereas Lee and Chow faced a more formal trial. Both Lee and Ho have been in custody since 2021, awaiting sentencing. Mitigation hearings for their cases are set to begin later this month, offering potential avenues for reduced penalties based on personal circumstances or remorse. The Hong Kong Alliance had played a pivotal role in maintaining public remembrance of the 1989 events, despite growing pressure from authorities. Its dissolution in 2020 marked a turning point in the suppression of politically sensitive activities in the territory. The NSL, which criminalizes secession, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign forces, has been used extensively to target critics of the Chinese government. The law has effectively curtailed freedoms of assembly, speech, and press, reshaping the political landscape of Hong Kong. The trial of Lee and Chow underscores the broader implications of the NSL on civil liberties in the region. Legal experts have noted that the interpretation of terms such as “subversion” and “incitement” has become increasingly broad, allowing authorities to justify arrests based on perceived ideological challenges to the CCP’s rule. This approach has drawn criticism from international human rights organizations, which argue that the law undermines the principle of “one country, two systems,” a cornerstone of Hong Kong’s governance structure. As the mitigation hearings approach, the focus will shift to whether the court considers factors beyond the alleged offenses, such as the activists’ histories, contributions to society, or expressions of regret. Meanwhile, the convictions send a clear message to remaining dissidents and advocacy groups about the risks associated with challenging the status quo in Hong Kong. The outcome of these proceedings could influence future legal strategies for those still engaged in nonviolent forms of protest.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter