ON
← Back to feed
Honeytrap thieves jailed for killing men they had drugged
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter10 days ago

Honeytrap thieves jailed for killing men they had drugged

A couple, Adina Mihai and Madalin Dumitru, were sentenced to 17 years in prison for manslaughter and poisoning after drugging men during sexual encounters to steal from them. They targeted men who paid for sexual services by spiking their drinks with the sedative gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), leading to the deaths of Gary Mouat and Malcolm King. The pair would meet victims at their homes, administer the drug, and then search for valuables once the victims were unconscious. Two other survivors were poisoned but did not die. During the trial, prosecutors stated that the defendants acted out of greed and failed to consider the severe risks associated with using GBL, which can be highly toxic. The court noted that Mihai had previously worked in the UK's sex trade and used online platforms to advertise her services.

A Romanian couple who drugged men seeking sexual services to rob them have been jailed for 17 years after two victims died. Adina Mihai, 31, and Madalin Dumitru, 30, admitted to the manslaughter of Gary Mouat, 37, from Oxfordshire, and Malcolm King, 80, from Gloucestershire, in 2025 and 2024 respectively. The pair also pleaded guilty to poisoning two other men with the sedative gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) during their trial at Oxford Crown Court. Both received 17-year prison sentences. Mihai, who posed as a sex worker, and Dumitru orchestrated the scheme by arranging to meet men via online platforms. She advertised her services on VivaStreet, taking cash deposits from victims before meeting them at their homes. Dumitru would drive Mihai to the location, waiting in a car nearby. Once there, Mihai would encourage the victim to drink alcohol laced with GBL, rendering them unconscious. While the victim was incapacitated, Mihai searched their home for valuables such as cash, jewelry, and watches. Dumitru remained outside, reportedly armed, in case of trouble. The court heard that four men were targeted using this method. Two of the victims, King and Mouat, died as a result. King, who had a history of heart issues and a pacemaker, was initially treated as a non-suspicious death. However, the case was reopened after Mouat’s death in similar circumstances nearly a year later. Detectives linked the two incidents through forensic evidence, including items stolen from victims and Mihai’s fingerprints found on wine glasses left behind in the men’s homes. During the trial, prosecutors revealed that the couple had moved from Birmingham to Ilford, Essex, prior to carrying out the crimes. They described the pair as acting out of greed, believing their victims were unlikely to report the crime due to the sensitive nature of the encounters. Julian Evans KC, the prosecutor, stated that the defendants had formed a joint plan to covertly administer the drug, despite knowing its potential dangers. The judge noted that the administration of GBL was haphazard, varying in dosage and potency, increasing the risk of severe harm or death. In a poignant moment during the sentencing, a video statement from Gary Mouat’s eight-year-old son was played. The child expressed grief and confusion, asking the defendants why they had chosen to kill his father instead of simply taking the money. He described his father as a kind, humorous, and loving person, emphasizing the loss he had suffered. The boy recounted how his life had become difficult since the incident, struggling with fear and sadness. His mother, Louise Mouat, also spoke in court, describing her husband as a “friendly, funny and kind man” whose death had shattered her future and family plans. The court also heard that two additional victims survived the attacks, though they remain unnamed due to legal protections. Items stolen from these individuals were recovered from the couple’s vehicle, which was stopped by police in Essex. Mihai’s fingerprints were found on the glasses used to serve the poisoned drinks, linking her directly to the crimes. Judge Mrs Justice Brunner KC emphasized the reckless nature of the defendants' actions, stating that even a brief consideration of the risks associated with GBL could have prevented the fatalities. She noted that the pair had failed to conduct basic research into the toxicity of the substance, highlighting their lack of awareness regarding the danger they were inflicting. The judge concluded that the defendants had acted with a clear intent to exploit their victims, prioritizing financial gain over human safety. As the couple faces the consequences of their actions, authorities have urged any remaining victims to come forward. The case underscores the dangers of unregulated substances and the devastating impact of criminal behavior on vulnerable individuals. The victims’ families continue to seek justice and closure, hoping that the outcome of the trial serves as a warning against such predatory acts.

3 reports

The Independent logoThe IndependentIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8510 days ago
Honeytrap killers drugged victims seeking escort services so they could steal from them – until two men died

Two individuals, Adina Mihai and Madalin Dumitru, operated as a 'honeytrap' duo targeting men seeking escort services. They drugged their victims with the date-rape drug GBL, stole valuables from their homes, and left them unconscious. Two victims died as a result of the poisonings, Malcolm King in August 2024 and Gary Mouat in July 2025. Initially, police dismissed the deaths as non-suspicious due to pre-existing health conditions, but the cases were reopened after the second death. The couple admitted to two counts of manslaughter and pleaded guilty to poisoning two other men in July 2025, who survived. They were sentenced to 17 years in prison. The judge emphasized the extreme risk of using GBL, noting that a simple awareness of its toxicity could have prevented the deaths.

Bias read (Center): While the crime itself is a serious legal matter, the article presents the facts objectively without overt ideological framing. It focuses on the legal consequences and judicial response rather than promoting a specific political agenda. The narrative remains balanced between describing the criminal

Why factuality (90): The Independent article accurately reports the timeline, methods, and outcomes of the crime, including the re-opening of Malcolm King's case and the admission of guilt by the defendants. It includes additional context about the police investigation and the potential for more victims, which adds dept

Why objectivity (85): The article remains largely objective, providing background information and quotes from the prosecution without taking sides. The term 'honeytrap killers' introduces a slight bias, but overall the tone remains balanced.

BBC News (UK) logoBBC News (UK)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 8010 days ago
Honeytrap thieves jailed for killing men they had drugged

A couple, Adina Mihai and Madalin Dumitru, were sentenced to 17 years in prison for manslaughter and poisoning after drugging men during sexual encounters to steal from them. They targeted men who paid for sexual services by spiking their drinks with the sedative gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), leading to the deaths of Gary Mouat and Malcolm King. The pair would meet victims at their homes, administer the drug, and then search for valuables once the victims were unconscious. Two other survivors were poisoned but did not die. During the trial, prosecutors stated that the defendants acted out of greed and failed to consider the severe risks associated with using GBL, which can be highly toxic. The court noted that Mihai had previously worked in the UK's sex trade and used online platforms to advertise her services.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a criminal case involving drug-facilitated theft and resulting deaths. It presents factual information about the crime, the legal proceedings, and judicial reasoning without apparent ideological framing or bias. The content focuses on the actions of individuals rather than any

Why factuality (85): The BBC article provides accurate details about the sentencing of Adina Mihai and Madalin Dumitru, including their 17-year sentences, the charges of manslaughter and administering poison, and the method involving GBL. It aligns closely with the cross-source consensus found in the other articles, tho

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting facts without overt bias. However, phrases like 'honeytrap thieves' and 'seeking sexual services' carry some judgmental connotations, slightly affecting neutrality.

Daily Mirror logoDaily MirrorIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6010 days ago
Heartbreaking words of boy, 9, to honeytrap plotters - 'Why did you kill my dad'

A 9-year-old boy named Alfie Mouat delivered a heartfelt victim impact statement at Oxford Crown Court, addressing the Romanian couple responsible for his father's death. The couple, Adina Mihai and Madalin Dumitru, were sentenced to 17 years in prison each for drugging four men with GBL during fake sexual encounters and stealing from them. Two of the victims, including Alfie's father Gary Mouat, died as a result. Alfie described his father as kind and loving, expressing deep sorrow over losing him and the lasting impact on his life. The court heard that the defendants had previously pleaded guilty to manslaughter and administering poison.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a criminal case involving non-political actors and does not present any political framing, bias, or commentary. It reports on a court proceeding and victim testimony without taking a stance or emphasizing political implications.

Why factuality (75): The Daily Mirror article contains accurate core facts about the convictions and the use of GBL. However, it focuses heavily on the emotional testimony of the 9-year-old boy, which may not be central to the factual account of the event. Some details, like the exact nature of the victim impact stateme

Why objectivity (60): The article is highly emotionally charged, emphasizing the personal tragedy of the victim's son. This focus on emotional appeal significantly reduces its objectivity, making it less balanced than the other articles.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories