ON
← Back to feed
Clancy holdout juror taps former Trump lawyer to fight back as he’s ‘dragged through the mud’: attorney
United States🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative

Clancy holdout juror taps former Trump lawyer to fight back as he’s ‘dragged through the mud’: attorney

In the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, which resulted in a mistrial due to a 11-1 deadlock, the lone holdout juror, Michael P. Desronvil, has hired attorney Edward Paltzik, a former legal representative of former U.S. President Donald Trump. Desronvil stated that he believed the prosecution had sufficient evidence to prove Clancy's guilt in the deaths of her three young children, which occurred in January 2023. He claimed that during jury deliberations, his attempts to explore alternative theories were met with resistance, leading him to maintain his position. Paltzik has previously represented Trump in several high-profile lawsuits, including those against the New York Times and CBS, though these cases have either been dismissed or settled. Desronvil's decision to retain Paltzik suggests he is preparing to defend his stance publicly.

The lone holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy triple murder case has hired an attorney who previously represented President Donald Trump, according to the juror’s new legal representative. Michael P. Desronvil, 48, retained Edward Paltzik, who has represented Trump in multiple high-profile lawsuits involving mainstream media companies. Desronvil, who was the sole juror to vote against convicting Clancy, has remained largely quiet since the mistrial that ended the trial in late August. Desronvil issued his first public statement since the mistrial, rejecting claims that he wavered in his judgment during deliberations. He stated that he did not have any doubts about the prosecution's case and believed there was sufficient evidence to show that Clancy knew exactly what she was doing and had planned the killings of her three children. The trial concluded with a deadlock after 38 hours of deliberation, resulting in a mistrial on September 4. Clancy, 36, faces three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children, Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; and Callan, 8 months old, who were found strangled at their home in January 2023. According to Paltzik, Desronvil is currently at an undisclosed secure location in rural Northern New England and is described as “safe and sound.” Paltzik emphasized that Desronvil is being protected from what he calls “evil people” who have attacked him, and he urged others to “pray for him and help us protect him.” Paltzik has represented Trump in several lawsuits, including one against The New York Times and another against CBS over a “60 Minutes” interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris. According to reports, Paramount Global paid $16 million to settle the CBS lawsuit, with the money designated for Trump’s presidential library. Additionally, Paltzik represented Trump in his lawsuit against ABC News, which settled for $15 million. Desronvil’s decision to retain Paltzik follows criticism from some of his fellow jurors, who claimed he was arrogant and disengaged during deliberations. Desronvil denied these claims, stating that he repeatedly attempted to explain alternative theories but was often cut off by other jurors. Desronvil has also faced scrutiny over allegations related to his personal life, including a previously dismissed domestic violence charge and a restraining order. His brother noted that the intense media coverage has led to his family being doxxed and harassed. Clancy admitted to killing her children in January 2023 using exercise bands and later attempted suicide. She remains at Tewksbury Hospital, a state-run facility, while prosecutors decide how to proceed following the mistrial. A hearing is scheduled for September 29. Desronvil’s brother expressed support for his decision, stating that he looked at the case and made his call. He emphasized that Desronvil is not backing down despite the backlash. Other jurors have publicly criticized Desronvil for his stance, but he maintains that he followed the evidence and believed it was sufficient to find Clancy guilty. His legal team continues to defend his position, emphasizing that he acted in accordance with the law and the evidence presented during the trial.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 4 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

4 reports

Fox News (US) logoFox News (US)IndependentConservativeFactual 95Objective 85
Clancy holdout juror taps former Trump lawyer to fight back as he’s ‘dragged through the mud’: attorney

In the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, which resulted in a mistrial due to a 11-1 deadlock, the lone holdout juror, Michael P. Desronvil, has hired attorney Edward Paltzik, a former legal representative of former U.S. President Donald Trump. Desronvil stated that he believed the prosecution had sufficient evidence to prove Clancy's guilt in the deaths of her three young children, which occurred in January 2023. He claimed that during jury deliberations, his attempts to explore alternative theories were met with resistance, leading him to maintain his position. Paltzik has previously represented Trump in several high-profile lawsuits, including those against the New York Times and CBS, though these cases have either been dismissed or settled. Desronvil's decision to retain Paltzik suggests he is preparing to defend his stance publicly.

Bias read (Conservative): The article emphasizes the involvement of Edward Paltzik, a known advocate for Donald Trump, in representing the holdout juror. This framing highlights the juror's alignment with Trump's legal team, potentially implying a political motivation behind the juror's actions. The narrative focuses on the

Why factuality (95): The article accurately summarizes the key facts from the primary source, including that Michael Desronvil retained Edward Paltzik, who previously represented Trump. It includes direct quotes from Desronvil and references Paltzik's previous cases with Trump. The information is well-supported and alig

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting the facts without overtly biased language. While it does quote Paltzik referring to Desronvil as an 'American Hero' and 'Champion of Justice,' it does so directly rather than endorsing or amplifying the claim. Overall, it avoids strong edit

The Daily Wire logoThe Daily WireIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 40
The Lindsay Clancy Holdout Juror Just Got An Unexpected Trump Connection

The lone holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy triple murder case, Michael P. Desronvil, has hired attorney Edward Paltzik, who previously represented former President Donald Trump in high-profile lawsuits against media outlets. Paltzik has praised Desronvil as an 'American Hero' and 'Champion of Justice,' emphasizing his support for Trump and the U.S. Constitution. Desronvil, who remains in a secure location, has faced intense scrutiny and criticism from media and fellow jurors but maintains his stance that Clancy was criminally responsible for the deaths of her children. The mistrial occurred after the jury deadlocked 11-1, with Clancy's defense arguing she suffered from postpartum psychosis. Other jurors have since criticized Desronvil's position.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the holdout juror as a 'hero' aligned with conservative values, explicitly linking him to former President Trump and using language that emphasizes constitutionalism and opposition to mainstream media. The emphasis on Trump's legal representation and the portrayal of the juror as忠

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports that Michael Desronvil retained Edward Paltzik, who has represented Trump in various lawsuits. It mentions Paltzik's representation of Trump in suits against The New York Times and CBS. However, it adds speculative details such as Desronvil being in a 'secure location'

Why objectivity (40): The article uses highly charged language like 'scorching attacks from the media and his fellow jurors,' 'evil people,' and 'wicked who wish harm upon him.' It also refers to Desronvil as an 'American Hero' and 'Champion of Justice,' which are subjective labels not supported by the primary source. Th

The New York Times (US) logoThe New York Times (US)Independent🔒CenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 90
Holdout Juror in Lindsay Clancy Case Says He Didn’t Doubt Her Guilt

A juror named Michael P. Desronvil in the Lindsay Clancy case explained his decision not to vote for her acquittal, stating he did not doubt her guilt. This indicates a divergence in opinion among jurors regarding the outcome of the trial.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the juror's perspective without overtly endorsing any particular political stance. It focuses on the legal proceedings rather than taking a clear ideological position, thus maintaining a balanced frame.

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting the juror's statements without apparent bias or emotional language. It frames the situation objectively, focusing on the juror's perspective without taking sides.

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesParty-alignedCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 85
Holdout juror in Clancy trial denies ever wavering on guilt

A juror who refused to reach a verdict in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial has spoken out, denying allegations by other jurors that he expressed doubts about the prosecution's case during deliberations. His decision to remain a holdout led to a mistrial as the jury was unable to reach a unanimous decision. The juror's comments suggest he maintained confidence in the prosecution's evidence throughout the process. The situation highlights the challenges of jury deliberation and the impact of individual jurors' decisions on legal outcomes.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a juror's actions and statements without overtly favoring any political ideology. It focuses on the procedural aspects of the trial and the implications of the mistrial, without taking a clear stance on the broader political implications of the case.

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the information neutrally but uses phrases like 'broken his silence' which slightly implies a narrative angle. Overall, it remains fairly balanced in tone.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories