ON
← Back to feed
His Research on Pregnant Opioid Users Was Widely Celebrated. Auditors and Experts Found Major Flaws.
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 days ago

His Research on Pregnant Opioid Users Was Widely Celebrated. Auditors and Experts Found Major Flaws.

Dr. Craig Towers, a high-risk obstetrician in Knoxville, Tennessee, conducted research suggesting that detoxing pregnant opioid users was safer for fetuses than traditional treatments like methadone or buprenorphine. His findings led to changes in clinical practices across multiple locations and earned him recognition as a 'Health Care Hero.' However, eight addiction and pregnancy specialists later raised concerns about the validity of his research, and a university audit identified significant flaws. Despite these issues, some clinics continued using methods based on his work. The study was eventually retracted due to methodological problems, and Towers retired under health and family-related reasons.

Go to the primary sources (5)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

ProPublica logoProPublicaIndependentCenter5 days ago
His Research on Pregnant Opioid Users Was Widely Celebrated. Auditors and Experts Found Major Flaws.

Dr. Craig Towers, a high-risk obstetrician in Knoxville, Tennessee, conducted research suggesting that detoxing pregnant opioid users was safer for fetuses than traditional treatments like methadone or buprenorphine. His findings led to changes in clinical practices across multiple locations and earned him recognition as a 'Health Care Hero.' However, eight addiction and pregnancy specialists later raised concerns about the validity of his research, and a university audit identified significant flaws. Despite these issues, some clinics continued using methods based on his work. The study was eventually retracted due to methodological problems, and Towers retired under health and family-related reasons.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the acclaim and the subsequent criticism of Dr. Towers' research without overtly favoring either side. It describes the controversy surrounding the study's methodology and its impact on clinical practice, while also acknowledging the initial positive reception. The framing,

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories