ON
← Back to feed
His pelvis was made for walking. Hers? Not so much, claims study of Neanderthal bones
IL🔬 Science6 days ago

His pelvis was made for walking. Hers? Not so much, claims study of Neanderthal bones

A new study from Tel Aviv University suggests that Neanderthal pelvises were anatomically similar to modern human females, which may explain why male Neanderthals were less efficient walkers compared to modern males. The research, published in Scientific Reports, analyzed two nearly complete Neanderthal pelvises discovered in Israel and Spain. The findings challenge previous assumptions that Neanderthal pelvis width was solely related to childbirth, proposing instead that reproductive constraints limited evolutionary adaptations in female pelvis shape. The study highlights differences in the positioning of the hip joint (acetabulum), noting that modern male hips sit further forward, allowing for more efficient walking mechanics. Researchers suggest these findings could influence future studies on human anatomy and the evolution of gender-specific physical traits.

His pelvis was made for walking. Hers? Not so much, claims study of Neanderthal bones A new study suggests that the differences in how men and women walk today might trace back to evolutionary adaptations in the pelvis. According to research published in Scientific Reports, male Neanderthals had pelvis structures remarkably similar to those of modern human males, while female Neanderthals shared anatomical traits with contemporary women. This finding challenges previous assumptions about the role of reproductive biology in shaping human evolution. The research, led by Prof. Yoel Rak of Tel Aviv University’s Department of Anatomy and Anthropology, analyzed Neanderthal pelvises discovered in two locations, Kebara Cave in Israel and Sima de los Huesos in Spain. These specimens, dating back approximately 130,000 to 40,000 years, allowed scientists to compare ancient anatomy with that of modern humans for the first time. The results suggest that the male pelvis evolved to support long-distance walking with greater efficiency, whereas female pelvises retained features more akin to those of Neanderthals due to biological constraints tied to reproduction. Rak explained that the key distinction lies in the positioning of the acetabulum, the hip joint. In modern human males, the hip sits further forward on the pelvic ring compared to both modern human females and male Neanderthals. This arrangement lowers the body’s center of mass, reducing strain on the joints and allowing for a more energy-efficient gait. The study describes this as a biomechanical advantage that enables the thighs to absorb impact, store energy during each step, and then release it to propel the body forward. “This evolution made the male a perfect walking machine,” Rak stated. The study notes that this structural adaptation likely gave early humans an edge in endurance activities such as hunting or traveling long distances. However, female pelvises could not undergo the same modifications because of the need for a wider birth canal and a shallower pelvic shape to accommodate childbirth. As a result, the female pelvis has remained largely unchanged from its Neanderthal ancestor, preserving certain anatomical characteristics that limit walking efficiency. Anthropologists previously believed the broader pelvis of Neanderthals was linked to longer gestation periods or the delivery of larger-headed infants. But the discovery of two nearly complete male Neanderthal pelvises changed this perspective. These specimens showed that the Neanderthal pelvis was not fundamentally different from that of modern humans, except in specific aspects related to the placement of the hip joint. The study highlights how evolutionary pressures shaped the human form in ways that still influence modern anatomy. While male pelvises have continued to adapt over time to enhance walking performance, female pelvises have remained relatively stable due to reproductive demands. This dynamic has implications beyond physical movement, influencing historical patterns of labor division and mobility among early human societies. The research team included collaborators from Spain, the Technion, Bar-Ilan University, and Ono Academic College. They emphasized that the findings, though based on a limited sample size, offer new insights into the interplay between anatomy, function, and evolution. The study also raises questions about how these anatomical differences may have affected social behaviors and survival strategies in prehistoric communities. As the field of paleoanthropology continues to uncover more evidence, the role of reproductive biology in shaping human evolution becomes increasingly clear. The Neanderthal pelvis, once considered a puzzle, now appears to hold clues about the complex forces that have influenced human development over thousands of years.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

The Times of Israel logoThe Times of IsraelIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 606 days ago
His pelvis was made for walking. Hers? Not so much, claims study of Neanderthal bones

A new study from Tel Aviv University suggests that Neanderthal pelvises were anatomically similar to modern human females, which may explain why male Neanderthals were less efficient walkers compared to modern males. The research, published in Scientific Reports, analyzed two nearly complete Neanderthal pelvises discovered in Israel and Spain. The findings challenge previous assumptions that Neanderthal pelvis width was solely related to childbirth, proposing instead that reproductive constraints limited evolutionary adaptations in female pelvis shape. The study highlights differences in the positioning of the hip joint (acetabulum), noting that modern male hips sit further forward, allowing for more efficient walking mechanics. Researchers suggest these findings could influence future studies on human anatomy and the evolution of gender-specific physical traits.

Bias read (Center): The article presents scientific findings without overt ideological framing. It discusses biological and anatomical research without taking a political stance, focusing purely on evolutionary biology and anthropology. The tone remains objective, citing academic sources and avoiding value judgments or

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the study's claim that Neanderthal pelvises were similar to modern females while male pelvises evolved for efficiency. However, it oversimplifies the findings by implying a direct causal link between reproductive needs and lack of evolution in female pelvises, without

Why objectivity (60): The article uses emotionally charged phrases like 'made for walking' and 'not so much,' which frame the findings in a gendered manner. It also presents the study's potential implications for gender roles in a speculative tone, suggesting a narrative rather than presenting the findings neutrally.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories