ON
← Back to feed
Highly provocative, Fani-Kayode rebuts cleric’s comment on Muslim-Muslim ticket
NG🏛️ PoliticsConservativeOverlooked by progressives13 days ago

Highly provocative, Fani-Kayode rebuts cleric’s comment on Muslim-Muslim ticket

An Islamic cleric named Sheikh Yahya Jingir has publicly advocated for Muslim-Muslim presidential tickets in Nigeria ahead of the 2027 general elections. Speaking at an event attended by members of the ruling All Progressives Congress, Jingir praised former President Bola Tinubu for promoting the Muslim-Muslim ticket during the 2023 elections and called on attendees to continue supporting such arrangements. He addressed criticisms from Christian and other religious groups, questioning whether advocating for Muslim-Muslim tickets constitutes wrongdoing. Jingir also emphasized the importance of voter registration, urging Muslims to obtain Permanent Voter Cards to assert their numerical strength in the country. His comments have sparked controversy, with critics expressing concern over the implications of prioritizing Muslim-only candidates in a diverse nation.

Islamic cleric Sheikh Yahya Jingir has ignited controversy by advocating for the continued use of Muslim-Muslim presidential tickets in Nigeria's upcoming 2027 general elections, prompting sharp criticism from prominent figures within the country's political sphere. Jingir, speaking at an event attended by several All Progressives Congress (APC) governors, including Abba Yusuf of Kano and Umar Namadi of Jigawa State, defended his stance by praising former president Bola Tinubu for championing the Muslim-Muslim ticket during the 2023 election. He emphasized that the policy was a reflection of Islamic principles and urged fellow Muslims to adhere to it. In his speech, Jingir acknowledged the opposition to the Muslim-Muslim ticket from Christians and other religious communities but challenged critics by questioning whether his advocacy constituted wrongdoing. He posed rhetorical questions about the presence of non-Muslims in Nigerian society, suggesting that the Muslim community should not be held accountable for the actions of others. “Have I stopped the Christians from their own slogans? Have I stopped traditionalists from a similar campaign?” he asked, reinforcing his belief that the Muslim-Muslim ticket was both necessary and justified. Jingir also addressed the broader implications of the policy, asserting that the Muslim population had the right to assert its influence in national politics. He criticized those who claimed that the Muslim minority outnumbered Christians, arguing instead that the Muslim community had successfully demonstrated its strength through electoral victories. “If it wasn’t for my stance on a Muslim-Muslim ticket, somebody would have claimed they are more populous than us,” he stated, claiming that the Muslim community had proven itself through past successes. His remarks drew immediate backlash, particularly from Nigeria’s Ambassador-designate to South Africa, Femi Fani-Kayode, who condemned Jingir’s statements as “highly provocative.” In a post on X, Fani-Kayode expressed deep concern over the cleric’s rhetoric, warning that it could undermine Nigeria’s unity and stability. “I have immense respect for Sheik Jingir but I am constrained to point out that the extremist rhetoric he has indulged in here is most unhelpful and neither is it true,” he wrote. Fani-Kayode further clarified that Nigeria was a secular and multi-religious nation, emphasizing that it was composed of both Christians and Muslims in equal numbers. The controversy surrounding Jingir’s comments has intensified online, with critics labeling his remarks as divisive and unsuitable for a pluralistic society. Social media platforms have been flooded with calls for restraint, urging religious leaders to avoid inciting tensions between different faith groups. Meanwhile, the debate continues to unfold, with political analysts and commentators weighing in on the potential impact of Jingir’s advocacy on Nigeria’s democratic processes. As the 2027 elections approach, the discussion around Muslim-Muslim tickets remains a contentious issue, reflecting deeper societal divisions. With key political figures expressing concerns over the direction of the discourse, the situation underscores the complex interplay between religion, politics, and identity in Nigeria. The coming months will likely see further developments as stakeholders navigate these challenges.

2 reports

Premium Times Nigeria logoPremium Times NigeriaIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 6513 days ago
Muslim-Muslim Ticket: Islamic cleric Jingir’s remarks trigger political backlash

Islamic cleric Sani Jingir has sparked political controversy in Nigeria by publicly endorsing the APC's 'Muslim-Muslim' presidential ticket during a mass wedding event in Kano. Speaking in Hausa, Jingir emphasized his commitment to the Muslim-Muslim ticket, claiming Nigeria is a Muslim-majority nation and accusing critics of falsehoods. He called on Muslims to vote en masse to demonstrate their numerical strength, referencing the APC's 2023 electoral success. His remarks drew condemnation from political figures like Rabiu Kwankwaso, a former Kano state governor and NDC vice-presidential candidate, who criticized the use of religious identity for political mobilization as divisive. Kwankwaso stressed the need for national unity and urged leaders to prioritize truth and reconciliation ahead of the 2027 general election.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the 'Muslim-Muslim' ticket as a legitimate and necessary political strategy, aligning with conservative religious narratives that emphasize communal identity. The emphasis on Muslim numerical strength and divine intervention in past victories suggests a right-leaning perspective.S

Why factuality (85): The article reports on Sani Jingir's public statements at a mass wedding event in Kano, citing specific quotes and context about his support for the Muslim-Muslim ticket. It mentions the reaction from political figures like Rabiu Kwankwaso, indicating a cross-source consensus on the controversy. The

Why objectivity (65): The article presents the cleric's remarks and the political backlash but uses emotionally charged language such as 'trigger political backlash' and 'pains the unbelievers.' It frames the issue through the lens of religious identity politics, showing some bias toward the cleric's perspective while no

The Punch logoThe PunchIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 6514 days ago
Highly provocative, Fani-Kayode rebuts cleric’s comment on Muslim-Muslim ticket

An Islamic cleric named Sheikh Yahya Jingir has publicly advocated for Muslim-Muslim presidential tickets in Nigeria ahead of the 2027 general elections. Speaking at an event attended by members of the ruling All Progressives Congress, Jingir praised former President Bola Tinubu for promoting the Muslim-Muslim ticket during the 2023 elections and called on attendees to continue supporting such arrangements. He addressed criticisms from Christian and other religious groups, questioning whether advocating for Muslim-Muslim tickets constitutes wrongdoing. Jingir also emphasized the importance of voter registration, urging Muslims to obtain Permanent Voter Cards to assert their numerical strength in the country. His comments have sparked controversy, with critics expressing concern over the implications of prioritizing Muslim-only candidates in a diverse nation.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the Muslim-Muslim ticket as a legitimate and necessary political strategy, aligning with conservative Islamic values and emphasizing the perceived numerical superiority of Muslims in Nigeria. The language used suggests a strong endorsement of the policy, while downplaying concerns

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the content of Sheikh Yahya Jingir's statements based on a viral video. It provides context about the political climate and references specific individuals like President Bola Tinubu and APC governors. The information aligns with cross-source consensus regarding the co

Why objectivity (65): The article presents the cleric's views with a somewhat sympathetic tone, using phrases like 'highly provocative' and 'staunch advocates.' While it reports the content objectively, it frames the issue in a way that may favor the cleric's perspective, showing bias in the narrative.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories