ON
← Back to feed
Hidden AirTag Exposes Amazon Destroying Rare Books in Bulk to Train AI
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsProgressive3 days ago

Hidden AirTag Exposes Amazon Destroying Rare Books in Bulk to Train AI

Investigative journalists from 404 Media discovered that Amazon is purchasing and destroying rare books in bulk to train its AI models. They placed a tracking device in a book, which led to an Amazon AI training facility in Las Vegas. At the facility, books have their spines removed for page scanning before being discarded. The facility's signage features a dinosaur seemingly devouring a book. AI companies like Anthropic are acquiring large quantities of older books because they are assured to be human-authored, reducing the risk of AI-generated content contaminating training data. Amazon stated it buys books through commercial channels to enhance its products and services.

A hidden Apple AirTag has revealed that Amazon is systematically purchasing and destroying rare books in bulk to train its artificial intelligence systems, according to an investigation by Novara Media. The discovery came after investigative journalists from 404 Media persuaded a bookseller to embed the tracking device into a batch of books that Amazon had ordered anonymously. The shipment was traced to VGT3, an Amazon AI training center located in Las Vegas, where the books undergo processing before being discarded. Inside the facility, the books are stripped of their spines to allow for page-by-page scanning, a process essential for feeding data into AI models. The warehouse's entrance features a sign displaying a dinosaur poised to consume a book, a visual metaphor for the destruction taking place within. This practice aligns with broader industry trends where AI companies seek out older books, which are more likely to be authored by humans and thus less prone to containing AI-generated content that could potentially corrupt training data. According to reports, Anthropic, the firm behind the Claude AI model, has invested tens of millions of dollars in acquiring millions of books to meet its demand for human-authored text. Earlier this year, the Washington Post detailed how such acquisitions are becoming increasingly common among AI developers seeking high-quality training materials. These efforts suggest a growing reliance on physical books as a reliable source of unaltered human language. Within the VGT3 warehouse, Amazon employees are reportedly tasked with scanning barcodes or ISBNs prior to scanning the actual contents of each book. This meticulous approach indicates that the company is systematically cataloging and processing vast quantities of printed material. At one point, concerns arose among staff regarding the potential closure of the facility should the supply of printed material diminish, though the operation continues unabated, as noted by Ars Technica. In response to these allegations, Amazon issued a statement asserting that it acquires books through commercial channels to enhance and refine the products and services used by its customers. The company did not provide further details about the specific role of these books in its AI development processes or address the implications of their disposal. The exposure of Amazon's practices highlights the increasing intersection between traditional media formats and emerging technologies. As AI models grow more sophisticated, the demand for diverse and extensive datasets continues to rise. This has led to a surge in interest from tech companies in historical and rare texts, which offer unique linguistic patterns and cultural contexts absent in modern digital content. The involvement of independent journalists in uncovering this activity underscores the critical role of investigative reporting in holding major corporations accountable. By leveraging technology such as the AirTag, reporters were able to trace the movement of goods and expose operations that would otherwise remain concealed. This incident serves as a reminder of the ongoing debate surrounding the ethical considerations of data collection and the environmental impact of large-scale information processing activities. As discussions around AI ethics gain momentum, the methods employed by companies like Amazon will come under closer scrutiny. The balance between innovation and responsibility becomes ever more crucial as the boundaries of technological advancement continue to expand. The fate of the books processed at facilities like VGT3 remains a focal point in this evolving discourse, with their destruction representing both a loss of cultural heritage and a step forward in the quest for advanced machine learning capabilities.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Novara Media logoNovara MediaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 753 days ago
Hidden AirTag Exposes Amazon Destroying Rare Books in Bulk to Train AI

Investigative journalists from 404 Media discovered that Amazon is purchasing and destroying rare books in bulk to train its AI models. They placed a tracking device in a book, which led to an Amazon AI training facility in Las Vegas. At the facility, books have their spines removed for page scanning before being discarded. The facility's signage features a dinosaur seemingly devouring a book. AI companies like Anthropic are acquiring large quantities of older books because they are assured to be human-authored, reducing the risk of AI-generated content contaminating training data. Amazon stated it buys books through commercial channels to enhance its products and services.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights corporate practices involving environmental impact and potential exploitation of cultural heritage, framing Amazon's actions as problematic and raising ethical concerns. This aligns with a left-leaning perspective that often critiques large corporations' environmental and data

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on Amazon's book acquisition and destruction process based on the 404 Media investigation. It mentions the use of an AirTag to track a book, the destination being an Amazon warehouse in Las Vegas, and the process of cutting book bindings for scanning. It also reference

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the findings in a clear and informative manner, but uses emotionally charged language such as 'caught' and 'destroying rare books in bulk.' It also implies potential ethical concerns without directly quoting Amazon's response, which could be seen as biased.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories