ON
← Back to feed
Map of 34 States Who Have Ended 'Orphan Tax' on Social Security
United States🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive11 days ago

Map of 34 States Who Have Ended 'Orphan Tax' on Social Security

At least 34 U.S. states and the District of Columbia have ended or significantly modified a practice where child welfare agencies used Social Security survivor benefits for children in foster care to cover foster care costs. This practice, referred to as the 'orphan tax,' was criticized for diverting funds intended for children to subsidize government services. The shift began in 2025 under pressure from the Trump administration, which encouraged states to cease this practice. Federal guidelines issued in 2023 require representative payees to prioritize beneficiaries' current needs while preserving benefits for future needs. Critics argue that the funds should remain with children for essential expenses like housing and education, while the Department of Health and Human Services maintains that these benefits were earned by the child's deceased parent and should be protected.

At least 34 states and the District of Columbia have moved to end or significantly alter a long-standing practice that allowed child welfare agencies to use Social Security survivor benefits received by children in foster care to cover the costs of their placement. This shift follows increasing pressure from the Trump administration, which has labeled the practice the “orphan tax.” Though not a formal tax, the term refers to the diversion of funds intended for children, often from deceased parents who contributed to the Social Security system, to offset public expenditures on foster care. The reforms gained momentum starting in 2025, with a key catalyst being a letter sent by Alex Adams, assistant secretary at the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), to U.S. governors in December 2023. Adams urged states to cease using Social Security benefits for foster care reimbursement, emphasizing that children in foster care should not bear the financial burden of their placement. His remarks were echoed in a January 2026 interview with NPR, where he stated, “There is no moral justification for why orphans should have to pay their own way. They are not in foster care by any fault of their own.” Federal guidelines issued in August 2023 by the Social Security Administration and the ACF clarified how child welfare agencies, acting as representative payees, should manage these benefits. According to the guidance, such funds must be used for the immediate needs of the child and preserved for future use if not immediately necessary. The policy aims to ensure that children retain control over their financial resources, particularly as they transition out of the foster care system. Social Security survivor benefits are available to children who lose a parent who contributed to the program. These benefits can amount to up to 75% of the deceased parent’s monthly payment, averaging around $1,179 per month as of July 2024. Historically, some states have redirected portions of these funds toward foster care costs, despite legal obligations to provide care for children in need. Critics argue this practice diverts essential resources away from children, potentially limiting their ability to secure housing, education, or other critical needs upon exiting the system. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. emphasized the ethical concerns surrounding the issue in a July 15 statement, stating, “Those benefits are meant to help their child, not reimburse the government. Every state should protect these children instead of taking what their families earned.” The department has continued to push for compliance with the new federal standards, urging states to align their policies accordingly. Among the states that have adopted the changes, Oklahoma joined the list on July 15, followed shortly thereafter by Iowa, Montana, and Michigan. Maine became the most recent addition on August 5. Each state has implemented measures aimed at ensuring that children in foster care retain access to their Social Security benefits. Oklahoma Governor J. Kevin Stitt highlighted the importance of the reform, noting its potential to improve the financial stability of youth transitioning out of foster care. The movement to end the so-called orphan tax reflects broader efforts to address systemic inequities within the child welfare system. As more states adopt similar policies, advocates continue to monitor implementation and advocate for consistent enforcement across jurisdictions. The impact of these changes on children’s long-term financial security remains a focus of ongoing discussions among policymakers and child welfare experts.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

The Hill logoThe HillIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8012 days ago
HHS touts 35 states that have scaled back 'orphan tax' on Social Security benefits

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced that 35 states have stopped intercepting federal Social Security benefits meant for orphans in foster care. This change ends a longstanding practice where state agencies would take survivor benefits from children in foster care after their parents’ deaths. The policy had been in place for decades, during which time funds were redirected to support foster care programs. The shift reflects a broader effort to ensure that children in foster care receive the financial support they are entitled to under federal law.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a policy change without overtly endorsing or criticizing either side of the issue. It focuses on the administrative action by HHS and the impact on foster care systems, without taking a clear ideological stance. The framing remains neutral, emphasizing

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that HHS stated 35 states have scaled back the 'orphan tax' on Social Security benefits. However, some details like the timeline and specific quotes are not corroborated by other sources, leading to a slight reduction in the score.

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the information in a neutral manner, avoiding overt bias. It provides context about the policy change without taking a clear stance, though it uses terms like 'touts' which slightly imply approval.

Newsweek logoNewsweekIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 7511 days ago
Map of 34 States Who Have Ended 'Orphan Tax' on Social Security

At least 34 U.S. states and the District of Columbia have ended or significantly modified a practice where child welfare agencies used Social Security survivor benefits for children in foster care to cover foster care costs. This practice, referred to as the 'orphan tax,' was criticized for diverting funds intended for children to subsidize government services. The shift began in 2025 under pressure from the Trump administration, which encouraged states to cease this practice. Federal guidelines issued in 2023 require representative payees to prioritize beneficiaries' current needs while preserving benefits for future needs. Critics argue that the funds should remain with children for essential expenses like housing and education, while the Department of Health and Human Services maintains that these benefits were earned by the child's deceased parent and should be protected.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a moral imperative to protect children's financial rights, emphasizing the ethical argument against using their benefits to subsidize government programs. It highlights criticism from advocacy groups and federal officials, portraying the change as a positive step for

Why factuality (80): The article correctly identifies that at least 34 states and DC have made changes regarding the 'orphan tax.' However, it includes speculative elements such as the claim that the effort began in 2025 and references a letter from December last year, which are not confirmed by other sources.

Why objectivity (75): The article leans slightly towards the perspective of the Trump administration and quotes Alex Adams, which might introduce a subtle bias. While it attempts to remain neutral, the inclusion of direct quotes and specific political context can influence reader perception.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories