ON
← Back to feed
Heart failure: Why women have a worse chance
Austria🩺 Health4 days ago

Heart failure: Why women have a worse chance

The article discusses the lower survival rates for women experiencing sudden cardiac arrest compared to men in Austria. According to emergency physician Mario Krammel, the survival chances decrease by ten percent per minute without resuscitation. Studies show that in the U.S., 45% of men but only 39% of women receive CPR in public settings. Research from the Medical University of Innsbruck revealed that the quality of CPR performed on female mannequins was worse, with less depth of chest compressions. Krammel explains that some men hesitate due to unfounded fears of sexual harassment during CPR on women. Legal expert Barbara Auracher-Jäger clarifies that such actions are not considered sexual assault if done solely to save a life. The article emphasizes the importance of proper CPR techniques for both genders to improve survival odds.

Every year in Austria, approximately 15,000 cases of sudden cardiac arrest occur, a condition where the heart abruptly ceases to function, halting blood flow and depriving vital organs of oxygen. According to Dr. Mario Krammel, head physician of Vienna’s professional rescue services and president of the organization PULS, Association Against Sudden Cardiac Death, the survival chances drop by ten percent with each passing minute without resuscitation. Women face particularly grim odds compared to men, with studies indicating that in public spaces in the United States, 45 percent of men receive CPR after cardiac arrest, while only 39 percent of women do. This disparity has been further underscored by research conducted by the Medical University of Innsbruck in March, which found that the quality of CPR performed on female mannequins was significantly lower than on male ones. The depth of chest compressions on the female models was less than the recommended five to six centimeters. The issue stems partly from misconceptions and unfounded fears among potential rescuers. Dr. Krammel explains that some individuals hesitate due to concerns over sexual harassment when performing CPR on women. However, these fears are baseless, he insists. He emphasizes that if someone, regardless of gender, is unresponsive and not breathing normally, immediate action is crucial. Initiating chest compressions can double or triple their chance of survival. To address these concerns, the PULS association released a video titled “Is THIS sexual harassment?” on YouTube, clarifying the legal aspects of resuscitating women. Legal expert Barbara Auracher-Jäger states in the video that touching a woman's breasts solely for the purpose of reviving her does not constitute sexual harassment and is not illegal. She adds that such actions do not violate a person's dignity, as they are purely aimed at life-saving measures. Furthermore, Auracher-Jäger notes that removing a bra during resuscitation efforts, if necessary for effective CPR, is not a violation of dignity either. Any injuries sustained during resuscitation, she says, would not carry legal implications. Dr. Krammel acknowledges that both men and women can suffer rib fractures during CPR, but these injuries are generally harmless and heal completely. If rescuers fail to press deeply enough on a woman’s chest, it could reduce her chances of survival. Deep compression is essential to establish minimal blood circulation, ensuring the heart and brain receive vital oxygen. Despite these clear guidelines, some rescuers might feel uncomfortable dealing with a bra during CPR. Dr. Krammel suggests that while it is possible to perform compressions with a bra still on, the presence of undergarments might lead to less forceful compressions due to discomfort. Additionally, placing defibrillator pads correctly becomes more challenging. For this reason, he recommends removing the bra as demonstrated in the PULS video. Until recently, training courses primarily used male mannequins, but this is changing. More courses now include female mannequins, reflecting a growing awareness of the need for inclusive training materials. Dr. Krammel stresses that in life-threatening situations, there should be no misplaced shame in touching a woman to save her life. Such hesitation can cost lives. The emphasis is on swift and decisive action, regardless of the patient's gender, to maximize the chances of survival. The ongoing efforts to educate the public and improve training methods aim to bridge the gap in survival rates between genders, ensuring that everyone receives timely and effective assistance when needed.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Kurier logoKurierParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 754 days ago
Heart failure: Why women have a worse chance

The article discusses the lower survival rates for women experiencing sudden cardiac arrest compared to men in Austria. According to emergency physician Mario Krammel, the survival chances decrease by ten percent per minute without resuscitation. Studies show that in the U.S., 45% of men but only 39% of women receive CPR in public settings. Research from the Medical University of Innsbruck revealed that the quality of CPR performed on female mannequins was worse, with less depth of chest compressions. Krammel explains that some men hesitate due to unfounded fears of sexual harassment during CPR on women. Legal expert Barbara Auracher-Jäger clarifies that such actions are not considered sexual assault if done solely to save a life. The article emphasizes the importance of proper CPR techniques for both genders to improve survival odds.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on health-related issues—specifically, the effectiveness of CPR based on gender—and does not present any political stance or controversy. It provides factual information and quotes medical professionals without evident bias.

Why factuality (85): The article provides specific statistics such as 15,000 cardiac arrests per year in Austria and references studies from the US and a simulation study by the Medical University of Innsbruck. These details appear consistent with general knowledge about gender differences in CPR outcomes and societal h

Why objectivity (75): The article presents information in a mostly informative manner but includes phrases like 'unbegründete Ängste' (unfounded fears) and quotes a medical expert stating these fears are 'completely unfounded,' which introduces a degree of opinion rather than strictly objective reporting. The tone leans

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories