ON
← Back to feed
ProPublica logo🏛️ Politics
United States🏛️ PoliticsConservative15 hr. ago

He’s Eligible for Up to $480,000 After Being Wrongly Imprisoned for 42 Years. The State Says No.

Elvis Brooks, a 69-year-old man wrongfully imprisoned for 42 years in Louisiana, was finally exonerated after prosecutors admitted they withheld critical fingerprint evidence. Despite being cleared of the crime, Brooks is now seeking up to $480,000 in compensation under a state program designed for wrongly convicted individuals. However, Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill has actively opposed his claim, arguing that Brooks remains guilty and thus ineligible for compensation. This stance aligns with Murrill's broader opposition to compensation claims, she has rejected nearly all of the 23 such requests made by other exonerees since taking office. Civil rights advocates describe Brooks' case as particularly severe, noting that Murrill has even threatened legal action against some exonerees to deter them from pursuing compensation.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

ProPublica logoProPublicaIndependentConservative15 hr. ago
He’s Eligible for Up to $480,000 After Being Wrongly Imprisoned for 42 Years. The State Says No.

Elvis Brooks, a 69-year-old man wrongfully imprisoned for 42 years in Louisiana, was finally exonerated after prosecutors admitted they withheld critical fingerprint evidence. Despite being cleared of the crime, Brooks is now seeking up to $480,000 in compensation under a state program designed for wrongly convicted individuals. However, Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill has actively opposed his claim, arguing that Brooks remains guilty and thus ineligible for compensation. This stance aligns with Murrill's broader opposition to compensation claims, she has rejected nearly all of the 23 such requests made by other exonerees since taking office. Civil rights advocates describe Brooks' case as particularly severe, noting that Murrill has even threatened legal action against some exonerees to deter them from pursuing compensation.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue as a conflict between the victim's family and the exoneree, emphasizing the attorney general's aggressive stance against compensation while highlighting the lack of empathy from Murrill. It presents Murrill's actions as obstructive and dismissive of the exonerees' plight

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories