Police and the Treasury will have access to the new register of crypto account holders
The Spanish government, in collaboration with the European Union, is implementing stricter measures to combat money laundering, particularly through cryptocurrency transactions. The new regulation mandates financial institutions, including crypto platforms, to register account openings and closures along with their holders' identities. This information will be stored in the national 'Fichero de Titularidades Financieras,' managed by the National Financial Integrity Authority (Anifi). The initiative aims to track illicit funds more effectively, especially since cryptocurrencies have become a preferred method for hiding illegal activities. According to reports, over $158 billion was laundered through crypto in 2023, driven by AI technologies. Authorities highlight that this move aligns with efforts to prevent terrorism financing and enhance transparency.
The Spanish government has announced plans to create a new national registry that will require cryptocurrency operators to disclose information about account openings and closures, marking a major step in its efforts to combat money laundering and illicit financial activities. The initiative, part of broader regulatory reforms under the Ministry of Economy led by Carlos Cuerpo, aims to bring greater transparency to the financial system by tracking ownership of accounts involving cryptocurrencies. Under the proposed legislation, entities such as investment fund managers, venture capital firms, securities agencies, and crypto platforms will be required to report detailed records of all account activity. This includes the name of the account holder, the institution where the account was opened, the type of account, whether cash, securities, or crypto, and the dates of opening and closure. While the registry will not include balances or transaction histories, it will provide critical data for law enforcement and tax authorities to trace illicit funds. This move comes amid growing concerns over the role of cryptocurrencies in facilitating illegal transactions. According to a report by TRM Labs, illicit flows through crypto assets reached $158 billion last year, driven in part by the anonymity they offer users. Money laundering often occurs through less-regulated channels, including cryptocurrency ATMs, peer-to-peer trades, and platforms with weak security measures or located in jurisdictions with lax oversight. In Spain, police have already uncovered several cases where criminal networks used crypto ATMs to launder proceeds from drug trafficking. The new registry, known as the Financial Holder Registry, will be managed by the newly established National Financial Integrity Authority (Anifi). It will replace the existing Financial Holder File, which has been collecting data on current accounts since more than a decade ago. Under the updated framework, each query made against the registry must be justified and logged, with access restricted to authorized officials such as judges, prosecutors, police, the Guardia Civil, the Tax Agency (AEAT), or the National Intelligence Center (CNI). A key innovation in this reform is the requirement for financial institutions to identify whether an account holder is itself subject to anti-money laundering obligations. This means that individuals flagged as high-risk due to their involvement in financial crimes will be tracked more closely. Additionally, the retention period for closed accounts will be extended from the previous standard, remaining in the registry for five years after closure, potentially up to ten years in total. Spain’s approach reflects a broader European Union strategy to tighten controls on digital finance. The EU has been increasingly targeting crypto assets as a tool for money laundering, particularly given their cross-border nature and the difficulty of tracing transactions. By requiring crypto platforms to comply with similar reporting standards as traditional banks, Spain is aligning itself with international efforts to close loopholes in financial regulation. The implementation of these rules will likely face challenges, especially regarding compliance from smaller crypto exchanges and private wallet providers. However, the government has stated that the majority of platforms are already registered with the Bank of Spain and will need to adjust their practices accordingly. As the legal framework takes shape, the focus will shift toward ensuring consistent enforcement and monitoring of the new requirements.
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The Spanish government, in collaboration with the European Union, is implementing stricter measures to combat money laundering, particularly through cryptocurrency transactions. The new regulation mandates financial institutions, including crypto platforms, to register account openings and closures along with their holders' identities. This information will be stored in the national 'Fichero de Titularidades Financieras,' managed by the National Financial Integrity Authority (Anifi). The initiative aims to track illicit funds more effectively, especially since cryptocurrencies have become a preferred method for hiding illegal activities. According to reports, over $158 billion was laundered through crypto in 2023, driven by AI technologies. Authorities highlight that this move aligns with efforts to prevent terrorism financing and enhance transparency.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the regulatory changes aimed at combating money laundering through cryptocurrencies. It includes perspectives from both governmental actions and expert opinions, without overtly favoring any side. The focus is on the implementation of policies rather than on a
Why factuality (75): The article accurately describes the expansion of the FTF to include crypto accounts, aligning with the primary source document about Sepblac's role. It mentions the legal basis (Ley 10/2010) and the entities required to declare information, which matches the official description. However, it does n
Why objectivity (65): The tone leans slightly towards emphasizing the government's action against money laundering, using phrases like 'declarado la guerra total' and highlighting the implications for the crypto industry. This suggests a somewhat supportive stance toward regulatory measures.
The article titled 'Hawala, la banca en la sombra' by RTVE Noticias discusses the phenomenon of hawala, which is described as an informal financial system often used for money transfers across borders. The piece highlights how hawala operates outside traditional banking systems and is frequently associated with illicit activities such as tax evasion and money laundering. It emphasizes the lack of regulation and oversight surrounding these transactions, raising concerns about their impact on formal financial institutions and legal economies. While the article presents hawala as a shadowy alternative to conventional banking, it does not explicitly take a stance on whether this system should be regulated or abolished.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames hawala as an unregulated and potentially illegal financial system, implying that state-controlled banking structures are more legitimate and transparent. This perspective aligns with progressive views that emphasize regulatory control and the need for oversight in financial spaces
Why factuality (65): The article discusses 'Hawala' as an informal financial system, providing general information about its operation and legal status. While it does not reference specific cases or data, it aligns with common knowledge about Hawala systems in various regions. Factually, it presents standard definitions
Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting information about Hawala without overt bias. It avoids taking sides on the legality or morality of the practice, though it does frame it as 'banca en la sombra' (shadow banking) which carries some negative connotation. This slight framing influences t
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.