ON
← Back to feed
Bild logo🏛️ Politics
Germany🏛️ PoliticsCenter2 days ago

Harry and Meghan: The Queen didn't want this.

The article discusses comments made by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle regarding their relationship with Queen Elizabeth II. The couple reportedly expressed that certain actions or decisions were not aligned with what the Queen wanted. The piece appears to focus on the internal perspectives of Harry and Meghan, highlighting their views on their interactions with the royal family.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have made headlines with their recent decision to return to the United Kingdom, a move that has sparked widespread speculation about its motivations and implications. The couple, who relocated to California in 2020 following their controversial departure from royal duties, are now reportedly considering a new chapter in their lives back in Britain. This timing has raised questions among observers, particularly given the ongoing tensions within the British royal family, especially involving Prince William, Harry’s brother. The couple’s potential return comes amid reports that Meghan is engaged in advanced negotiations to participate in the third season of the Netflix series The Gentlemen, directed by Guy Ritchie. According to industry insiders, discussions are currently underway regarding her involvement in the show, which follows a man who inherits a large estate from his father, a duke, and uncovers a vast cannabis plantation tied to a drug empire. While the production company has yet to confirm the casting, both The Hollywood Reporter and Deadline have reported that talks are progressing, though they remain speculative at this stage. The second season of the series is set to debut in September, adding urgency to the current discussions. Meghan had previously stated she was done with acting after marrying Harry, telling Variety in 2022 that she had “no intention” of returning to the screen. However, recent developments suggest a shift in her stance. Reports indicate that the couple still holds a contract with Netflix, which was initially worth between $60 million and $100 million in 2020 but has since been reduced significantly. This connection to the entertainment industry could play a role in their decision to return to the UK, potentially offering them a platform to continue their careers while navigating their relationship with the royal family. The decision to return has also drawn attention due to the context surrounding their previous years in the public eye. Meghan has spoken publicly about the racial abuse she faced during her time as a member of the royal family, as well as the intense pressure she felt during her pregnancy with son Archie. These experiences contributed to her decision to step away from royal duties and relocate to the United States. Now, as she considers a return to acting, the question arises whether this marks a broader effort to reestablish herself professionally and personally. Harry and Meghan have remained largely silent on the subject of their return. When approached by an Associated Press journalist about the possibility of moving back to the UK, Harry responded with “Nothing to say,” indicating he has no immediate plans to comment further on the topic. Despite the lack of official statements, the couple’s representatives have not denied the reports, leaving room for continued speculation about their intentions. The potential return of Harry and Meghan to the UK is being viewed through multiple lenses. Some see it as a strategic move to reengage with the royal family, possibly seeking a more active role in the monarchy despite past conflicts. Others believe it could be a calculated step to leverage their media presence and influence, particularly through their ongoing ties with Netflix. Regardless of the motivations, the move underscores the evolving dynamics within the royal family and the complex interplay between personal choices and public perception. As the situation unfolds, the focus will likely remain on how the couple navigates their return, both in terms of their professional aspirations and their relationships with the remaining members of the royal family. With no definitive statements from either Harry or Meghan, the path forward remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: their decisions will continue to shape the narrative around the British monarchy in the coming months.

1 reports

Bild logoBildIndependentCenterFactual 30Objective 202 days ago
Harry and Meghan: The Queen didn't want this.

The article discusses comments made by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle regarding their relationship with Queen Elizabeth II. The couple reportedly expressed that certain actions or decisions were not aligned with what the Queen wanted. The piece appears to focus on the internal perspectives of Harry and Meghan, highlighting their views on their interactions with the royal family.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the statements of Harry and Meghan without overtly favoring one side over another. It does not exhibit clear biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the couple's perspective rather than taking a stance on the broader皇

Why factuality (30): The article contains vague and unsubstantiated claims about Harry and Meghan's intentions regarding a return to the UK. It references a quote from the primary source about Queen Elizabeth being a 'shining example of female leadership,' but it misrepresents the context and adds unverified details abo

Why objectivity (20): The article uses highly emotive and biased language such as 'hart, aber ehrlich' (hard but honest) and suggests that the Queen did not want certain actions by Harry and Meghan, which is speculative and not supported by evidence. The tone is clearly opinionated and lacks balance.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories