ON
← Back to feed
Mobile phone handles for bicycles under test: models from Feschd, Quad Lock, SP Connect and more
Germany⚽ Sports8 days ago

Mobile phone handles for bicycles under test: models from Feschd, Quad Lock, SP Connect and more

Der Spiegel veröffentlichte einen Testbericht über verschiedene Halterungen für Smartphones an Fahrrädern, einschließlich Modelle von Feschd, Topeak, SKS und Quad Lock. Der Bericht wurde am 6. April 2026 aktualisiert und beschreibt die verschiedenen Arten von Halterungen, von einfachen Silikonbändern bis hin zu Systemlösungen mit dauerhafter Montage am Lenker. Es werden Unterschiede zwischen spezifischen Cases für bestimmte Smartphone-Modelle und universellen Lösungen hervorgehoben. Zudem wird erwähnt, dass einige Modelle auch zur Stromversorgung des Smartphones dienen können. Der Bericht weist darauf hin, dass wasserdichte Hülle oft nicht nötig sind, da moderne Smartphones bereits Schutzklasse IP67 oder IP68 besitzen. Es werden auch Empfehlungen für unterschiedliche Fahrradtypen gegeben.

A new test report has been published evaluating smartphone holders for bicycles, featuring models from brands such as Feschd, Quad Lock, SP Connect, and others. The report was last updated on April 6, 2026, with two additional products included in the evaluation. These holders are designed to keep smartphones securely mounted while cycling, whether during leisure trips or urban commutes. Navigation apps like Komoot and Strava, alongside free services such as Google Maps and Apple’s “Maps” app, play a crucial role in helping cyclists find their way. However, these apps require the phone to be within sight, which necessitates the use of a holder attached to the handlebars or stem. Smartphone holders come in various forms, ranging from simple silicone bands suitable for almost any device to more complex systems requiring permanent installation on the handlebar or stem. In some cases, these systems include specialized cases that allow the phone to be securely fastened, and even integrated power banks for charging on the go. While silicone bands offer broad compatibility, they lack the durability and security of cases tailored to specific devices. iPhone users have access to a wide range of compatible cases, though options are also available for Samsung and Google phones. For less common smartphones, universal cases, often in the form of waterproof pouches, are a viable alternative. These pouches provide water resistance but can limit touchscreen functionality and are generally less secure than custom-fit cases. Users must ensure the chosen case fits their specific model, as not all phones will fit into every pouch. The report highlights several key features and considerations for potential buyers. One critical factor is water resistance. Modern smartphones often have IP67 or IP68 ratings, offering protection against water exposure. As such, many users may not need a fully waterproof case unless they frequently encounter heavy rain. The report notes that while some cases restrict touch screen usability, this limitation may be unnecessary given the inherent water resistance of modern devices. Among the tested models, the SP Connect system stands out for its versatility, allowing the phone to be secured on a bicycle, motorcycle, or car. However, full functionality requires using SP Connect-specific cases. For users who prefer to retain their preferred phone case, the SKS Smartgrab 360 offers a universal solution that works with nearly all smartphones and remains permanently installed on the handlebar. The Topeak Omni Ridecase II is recommended for folding bikes like the Brompton due to its compact design and ease of use. Several other models were evaluated, including the Contec Bug Pro, Quad Lock kit, Lezyne Smart Grip Phone Mount, Hama Universal Holder, Bike Citizens Finn, SKS Compit+, Thule Smartphone Bike Mount, and Fidlock Vacuum Phone Case. Each product brings unique advantages, such as portability, ease of installation, or integration with accessories like power banks. The Feschd model, in particular, was praised for its stability and user-friendly design. It uses a special case with a built-in safety clip that ensures the phone stays firmly in place during rides. This model is especially suited for gravel biking, where stability is essential. The report notes that Feschd’s system fulfills its promise of securing the phone safely and comfortably on the handlebar.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Der Spiegel logoDer SpiegelIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 788 days ago
Mobile phone handles for bicycles under test: models from Feschd, Quad Lock, SP Connect and more

Der Spiegel veröffentlichte einen Testbericht über verschiedene Halterungen für Smartphones an Fahrrädern, einschließlich Modelle von Feschd, Topeak, SKS und Quad Lock. Der Bericht wurde am 6. April 2026 aktualisiert und beschreibt die verschiedenen Arten von Halterungen, von einfachen Silikonbändern bis hin zu Systemlösungen mit dauerhafter Montage am Lenker. Es werden Unterschiede zwischen spezifischen Cases für bestimmte Smartphone-Modelle und universellen Lösungen hervorgehoben. Zudem wird erwähnt, dass einige Modelle auch zur Stromversorgung des Smartphones dienen können. Der Bericht weist darauf hin, dass wasserdichte Hülle oft nicht nötig sind, da moderne Smartphones bereits Schutzklasse IP67 oder IP68 besitzen. Es werden auch Empfehlungen für unterschiedliche Fahrradtypen gegeben.

Bias read (Center): Der Artikel behandelt ein neutrales Thema im Bereich des Sports (Radfahren) und vergleicht verschiedene Produkte objektiv. Es wird keine politische Meinung oder parteiengerechte Darstellung vertreten. Der Ton bleibt sachlich und informativ, ohne eine klare Richtung zu verfolgen.

Why factuality (85): The article discusses a product test for bike phone holders, providing details on different types of mounts and compatibility with various smartphones. It accurately describes the functionality and features of these products without making unsupported claims. The information aligns with typical prod

Why objectivity (78): The tone remains informative and neutral, focusing on the practical aspects of bike phone holders. There is no overt bias toward any brand or product, though some promotional elements are present in describing the benefits of certain models. The language is professional but slightly leans toward pro

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories