6 reports
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 8520 days ago Khamenei approved the memorandum of understanding, even though he has a different opinion.Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei has approved a understanding agreement signed by Iranian and American presidents, despite having differing opinions. He stated he received assurances from President Masoud Pezeshkian and other high-ranking officials that Iran's rights and interests of the resistance front would be protected. Khamenei emphasized that future direct negotiations with the United States would not mean accepting an 'enemy stance.' He mentioned he had a different opinion but gave his approval due to the commitment made by the respected Iranian president, as head of the Supreme
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents Khamenei's approval of the agreement while emphasizing Iran's national interests and resistance against Israel, which aligns with leftist or nationalist rhetoric. The framing highlights protection of Iran's sovereignty and resistance front, suggesting a critical stance toward U.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 85): Article provides information on Hamenei’s approval of the memorandum, aligning with cross-source consensus. It remains neutral and presents facts without overt bias.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 6526 days ago Iran declared victory in the war with the Americans: "We've come out of this stronger!"The article discusses signals from both the United States and Iran indicating that an agreement to end their conflict is approaching. A senior U.S. administration official stated that both sides agree on the matter.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on diplomatic developments between the U.S. and Iran without taking a stance or using biased language. It presents information neutrally, focusing on the reported agreement between the two parties.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 65): Accurate reporting with details from Western sources and Iranian officials. The article maintains a balanced approach, though there is a slight emphasis on the strategic implications of the deal for regional stability.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 6526 days ago Minister: 'Iran is the winner, our sword will always hang above Hormuz'The U.S. and Iran have signaled that an agreement to end the war is approaching, with a senior administration official stating that both sides agree on the document and that Washington expects the initial agreement to be signed in the coming days.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on diplomatic signals between the U.S. and Iran regarding an agreement to end the conflict, without using biased language or emphasizing one side over the other. It presents the information neutrally, based on statements from a senior U.S. administration official.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 65): Reports accurately on the agreement and its immediate effects, with details aligned with other sources. The tone is slightly more supportive of Iran, focusing on their perceived victory and continued influence over strategic routes.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 7024 days ago What does the agreement between America and Iran actually mean: 'This is not the beginning of the end'The article discusses a reported agreement between the United States and Iran aimed at ending their conflict, though the exact terms of the document remain unclear. According to Sky News' correspondent Mark Stone, the agreement appears to be a two-page memorandum of understanding. The Iranian semi-official news agency Mehr reports it would need confirmation through a UN Security Council resolution. Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehzad Sharif stated the agreement includes an immediate and permanent halt to military operations across all fronts, including Lebanon, with a 60-day ceasefire period for
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or framing. It reports on the content of the agreement as described by various sources without taking a clear stance or emphasizing one side over another.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 70): Article discusses the implications of the agreement but contains some speculative statements about the content of the document. It leans slightly towards an Iranian perspective.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 6524 days ago PHOTO, VIDEO / Iran and the US reached an agreement, Israel attacked Lebanon. Trump angry at Netanyahu: 'Bibi has no *e* discretionThe U.S. and Iran have reached an agreement to end their conflict, with an official ceremony scheduled for Friday in Switzerland. This development comes despite Israel's attack on Lebanon over the weekend, which both Iran and President Donald Trump criticized. The terms of the agreement include the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz without tolls, lifting the U.S. blockade on Iranian ports, extending the ceasefire, and continuing negotiations on Iran's nuclear program for an additional 60 days. President Trump announced these details on his social media platform, Truth Social.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the agreement between the U.S. and Iran, including quotes from both President Trump and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. It does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The content remains fact
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 65): Moderately factual, covering analyst views on the deal's implications. Objectivity is lower due to inclusion of military analyst opinions which may introduce bias.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 6525 days ago Iran says 'slow', Trump says 'we sign the agreement tomorrow, the Hormuz opens'The United States and Iran have signaled that an agreement to end the war is near, with a high-ranking U.S. administration official stating that the parties have agreed on the text and that Washington expects the initial agreement to be signed in the coming days.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on diplomatic developments between the U.S. and Iran without using biased language or emphasizing one side over the other. It presents the situation neutrally, focusing on the reported agreement and expectations for signing an agreement.
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 65): Contains conflicting reports from different sources, including claims about conditions for nuclear agreements. Less objective in framing potential outcomes.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter