The Croatian national football team conducted its final training session ahead of their upcoming match against England in Dallas, Texas, under sweltering conditions where temperatures exceeded 30 degrees Celsius. The session took place in Arlington, just outside Dallas, and was observed by numerous journalists over a span of 15 minutes. This training marked the last preparation before the crucial encounter scheduled for the following evening, local time. The team's head coach, Zlatko Dalić, along with star player Luka Modrić, will participate in a press conference later in the day, which has generated significant interest among fans and media alike.
As part of the buildup to this important match, Croatian supporters have planned a unique display of support. They intend to unfurl a flag measuring 150 meters long near the hotel where the team is staying, the W Hotel. Additionally, horseback riders accompanied by fans dressed in traditional attire are expected to pass by the hotel, adding a visual spectacle to the atmosphere surrounding the team’s preparations. Fans can also watch these events from the windows of the hotel, offering them a front-row view of the excitement building up around the squad.
Regarding the starting lineup, Croatia is expected to field a formation featuring Livaković in goal, followed by defenders Gvardiol, Vušković, Šutalo, and Stanišić. Midfielders Perišić, Modrić, Kovačić, and Petar Sučić are likely to feature prominently, with Baturina and Musa as forwards. The decision on whether to include Kovačić in the starting XI remains uncertain, as some players are pushing for him to secure a spot in the first eleven. This uncertainty highlights the ongoing debate within the team about the best approach to the midfield configuration.
The recent performance of the Croatian team against England has sparked discussions among analysts and former players. Vahid Halilhodžić, a renowned Bosnian-Herzegovinian football coach and former top player, expressed concerns about the team's current form. He pointed out that despite the loss, which ended with a scoreline of 4-2 in favor of England, there were several issues that need addressing. Halilhodžić noted that Croatia had not reached the level required to achieve high ambitions at the World Cup, emphasizing the lack of experience among younger players and the absence of key figures who contributed medals in previous tournaments.
He highlighted the physical condition of older players such as Modrić, Perišić, and Kramarić, suggesting they might be lacking the necessary speed and stamina. Halilhodžić also criticized the defensive strategy employed by Dalić, stating that it did not suit the team well and allowed England to dominate in transitions and create scoring opportunities. Despite acknowledging the quality of Croatia's goals, he emphasized the overall lack of attacking flair and the defensive lapses that led to the defeat.
In response to questions regarding the selection of players, former player Lončarević raised concerns about why certain players, including Gvardiol, Vušković, and Kovačić, were not getting enough playing time. He questioned the rationale behind excluding these players, especially considering their fitness levels and past performances. Lončarević suggested that the coaching staff should prioritize selecting the best available players based on their current form rather than other factors.
Looking forward, Croatia faces a critical challenge in their upcoming matches against Panama and Ghana. Analysts believe that the team must win both games to avoid elimination from the group stage. However, given the current form and the strength of their opponents, achieving this objective appears daunting. The team's ability to bounce back from the defeat against England will be crucial in determining their success in the tournament. As the World Cup progresses, all eyes will remain on how Croatia adapts and responds to the challenges ahead.
4 reports
Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7522 days agoThe Croatian national football team trained in Arlington ahead of their match against England. The training took place in very hot conditions, with temperatures over 30 degrees Celsius. Luka Modrić and coach Zlatko Dalić will attend a press conference before the game. Fans plan to display a 150-meter flag outside the hotel where the team is staying. The article mentions potential starting lineups and notes uncertainty around the midfield position.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on sports events and does not take a political stance or show bias in framing. It provides factual information about the team's preparations, fan activities, and possible lineup without ideological slant.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 75): The article reports on training details and upcoming match preparations factually. It includes specific information about temperatures, player lineups, and fan activities. The tone remains largely neutral, though there is some emphasis on the spectacle aspect of the event.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6521 days agoCroatia lost their first group stage match at the World Cup to England with a score of 4:2. The legendary Bosnian-Herzegovinian coach Vahid Halilhodžić criticized Croatia's performance, noting that the team lacks players who have previously brought medals to the country. He pointed out that key players like Modrić, Perišić, and Kramarić are aging and lack the necessary speed. Additionally, some players such as Kovačić and Gvardiol have been inactive for a long time. Halilhodžić also mentioned that Croatian fans expect more from the team but this current squad is not capable of achieving greats
Bias read (Center): The article discusses a sports event and provides an analysis by a former player and coach. It presents Halilhodžić's critique of the national football team's performance without showing any clear ideological bias or partisan framing.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 65): The article presents Halilhodžić's critique of Croatia's performance accurately based on the match outcome and his analysis. However, some statements are speculative (e.g., 'this result could have been even worse') and lack specific data. The tone leans slightly toward criticism of Croatian football
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 6026 days agoThe article discusses the dilemma faced by coach Dalić regarding whether to include players like Kovačić, Modrić, and Sučić in the national team, focusing on their development and roles within the team.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on sports strategy and player development without taking a clear ideological stance or showing bias toward any political perspective. It remains neutral in its discussion of football tactics and personnel decisions.
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 60): The article provides historical context about Croatia's midfield legacy but includes subjective interpretations of past coaches' strategies. It lacks concrete evidence for claims about current players' abilities and frames the discussion around past successes, which may not align with current realit
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 5518 days ago "Dalice, why don't you get the best players, why can't these three get you a minute?"The article discusses comments made by football player Lončarević during an interview on the show 'Sport Nedjeljom,' where he criticizes the selection of players for Croatia's national team. He questions why certain top players like Gvardiol, Kovačić, and Modrić are not being utilized more effectively, suggesting they are not receiving enough playing time despite their form and experience. Lončarević expresses confusion over the decision-making process behind player selections, implying there might be internal politics or biases influencing choices. The article notes that Croatia is preparing for a match against Panama and highlights the importance of fielding the best available players regardless of personal backgrounds or past achievements.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses solely on sports commentary regarding player selection and performance, with no direct political implications or framing. It does not involve political figures, policies, or contentious issues beyond the sports context.
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 55): The article quotes Lončarević's frustration with player selection decisions, which is factual. However, it contains strong opinions and rhetorical questions that suggest bias. The tone is more confrontational than neutral, affecting overall objectivity.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Croatia
