ON
← Back to feed
Iranian Revolutionary Guard announces attacks against US in two Kuwaiti military bases
CL🏛️ PoliticsProgressive4 hr. ago

Iranian Revolutionary Guard announces attacks against US in two Kuwaiti military bases

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) of Iran has claimed responsibility for attacks targeting U.S. military assets at two bases in Kuwait, Ali al Salem and Al Adiri. The IRGC stated these actions were in retaliation for U.S. military casualties and interference in the Strait of Hormuz. According to the IRGC's statement, their forces destroyed a military warehouse, a Patriot missile defense system, and a drone hangar at Ali al Salem, while also attacking helicopter hangars and damaging helicopters and drones at Al Adiri. They also targeted a telecommunications tower, citing previous U.S. attacks on similar infrastructure in Iran. The IRGC defended its actions by arguing that U.S. military bases in Kuwait violate Kuwaiti sovereignty, asserting that the U.S. imposes its laws and controls access to these facilities, thereby violating local sovereignty.

The Iranian Revolutionary Guard has claimed responsibility for a new attack targeting U.S. military installations in Jordan, escalating tensions in the region. According to reports, the strike was carried out in response to recent U.S. bombings against Iran, which Tehran has accused of violating ceasefire agreements. The attack reportedly targeted a defensive radar system in Jordanian territory, with Iranian officials stating that one F-15 fighter jet was destroyed during the operation. This follows a series of clashes between the two nations over alleged violations of mutual agreements. Jordanian authorities confirmed the interception of five Iranian drones and three missiles launched toward their airspace. They stated that these operations were neutralized efficiently and precisely, resulting in no casualties or material damage. A military statement emphasized that Jordan will continue monitoring its airspace to counter any potential threats. Experts have been deployed to the area to ensure safety and deactivate any remaining explosives among the wreckage. The Iranian attack comes after the United States announced the deaths of two military personnel in an airstrike near a Jordanian airbase earlier this week. A third individual was reported missing, with unidentified remains found at the site. While there is no official confirmation linking the incident directly to the current conflict, the timing suggests a possible connection. The U.S. has cited violations of a memorandum of understanding as justification for its actions, though Iran has denied these claims and accused Washington of breaking ceasefires. Tehran has responded to U.S. strikes with attacks on American interests in the region, raising concerns about the stability of ongoing peace talks. The latest Iranian action appears to be part of a broader pattern of retaliation, with both sides accusing each other of breaching agreed terms. The situation has intensified diplomatic pressure, with fears growing that negotiations for a lasting peace agreement could collapse under the weight of continued hostilities. Iranian state media, including the public television channel IRIB, described the attack as part of a strategy to disrupt enemy radar systems and pave the way for future missile and drone strikes. Officials warned that the region is not a safe space for U.S. aggressors and urged Washington to withdraw its forces to prevent further loss of life. These statements reflect a hardline stance from Tehran, emphasizing the perceived threat posed by American military presence in the Middle East. Jordan’s defense ministry has maintained a measured tone, focusing on the successful interception of Iranian projectiles without reporting any harm. However, the country continues to face the challenge of managing cross-border tensions while maintaining regional stability. Military analysts suggest that the incident underscores the fragile nature of security arrangements in the area, particularly given the ongoing disputes between major powers. With both sides continuing to accuse each other of violating agreements, the risk of further escalation remains high. The international community is watching closely, as the situation could lead to renewed violence or even broader regional instability. For now, the immediate focus remains on ensuring the safety of civilians and preventing any unintended consequences from the ongoing conflict.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

La Tercera logoLa TerceraIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 702 days ago
Iran's Revolutionary Guard claims responsibility for new attack on US facilities in Jordan

The Iranian Revolutionary Guard has claimed responsibility for a new attack targeting U.S. military installations in Jordan, responding to recent U.S. airstrikes against the country. According to Jordanian authorities, five Iranian drones were intercepted and neutralized without causing casualties or material damage. The attack reportedly targeted a defensive radar system and resulted in the destruction of an F-15 aircraft. Jordan confirmed the interception of three Iranian missiles aimed at its territory, which were also neutralized without incident. The escalation follows U.S. confirmation of the deaths of two military personnel in an attack on a Jordanian airbase, with remains potentially belonging to a third missing individual. Both sides accuse each other of violating agreements, raising concerns over the collapse of peace negotiations.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Iranian Revolutionary Guard's actions as a justified retaliation against U.S. aggression, using strong anti-American rhetoric ('infanticidal army', 'aggressors') and portraying Iran as a victim of U.S. violations. While the report includes Jordanian responses, the emphasis on

Why factuality (85): The article reports conflicting accounts from both Iran’s Revolutionary Guard and Jordanian military forces. It cites statements from both sides without clear bias, though it emphasizes the Iranian claim of attacking U.S. installations. The reporting aligns with cross-source consensus that there was

Why objectivity (70): The tone leans slightly toward the Iranian perspective, particularly in quoting the Revolutionary Guard’s statement about 'making a night black for enemy radars' and the reference to the U.S. as an 'infanticidal army.' While the article presents both sides, the language used to describe the Iranian

La Tercera logoLa TerceraIndependent🔒Progressive4 hr. ago
Iranian Revolutionary Guard announces attacks against US in two Kuwaiti military bases

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) of Iran has claimed responsibility for attacks targeting U.S. military assets at two bases in Kuwait, Ali al Salem and Al Adiri. The IRGC stated these actions were in retaliation for U.S. military casualties and interference in the Strait of Hormuz. According to the IRGC's statement, their forces destroyed a military warehouse, a Patriot missile defense system, and a drone hangar at Ali al Salem, while also attacking helicopter hangars and damaging helicopters and drones at Al Adiri. They also targeted a telecommunications tower, citing previous U.S. attacks on similar infrastructure in Iran. The IRGC defended its actions by arguing that U.S. military bases in Kuwait violate Kuwaiti sovereignty, asserting that the U.S. imposes its laws and controls access to these facilities, thereby violating local sovereignty.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Iranian attack as a justified act of resistance against U.S. aggression, using strong language to condemn U.S. military actions and assert Iran's moral and legal justification. It emphasizes the U.S. violation of sovereignty and portrays the IRGC as defending national honor, a

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories