ON
← Back to feed
Groups slam Marcos’ Sona push for waste-to-energy tech, cite toxic risks
PH🏛️ PoliticsProgressivenow

Groups slam Marcos’ Sona push for waste-to-energy tech, cite toxic risks

Environmental organizations in the Philippines, including BAN Toxics and the EcoWaste Coalition, have criticized President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s proposal to introduce waste-to-energy (WTE) technologies through amendments to the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act. They argue that WTE poses significant toxic risks, producing harmful byproducts like dioxins and furans, and could incentivize the continued production of single-use plastics. The groups emphasize that WTE does not address the root causes of the waste crisis and instead perpetuates a system that promotes disposable goods. They call for stronger policies to reduce waste, ban single-use plastics, and promote sustainable alternatives such as zero-waste initiatives.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentProgressivenow
Groups slam Marcos’ Sona push for waste-to-energy tech, cite toxic risks

Environmental organizations in the Philippines, including BAN Toxics and the EcoWaste Coalition, have criticized President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s proposal to introduce waste-to-energy (WTE) technologies through amendments to the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act. They argue that WTE poses significant toxic risks, producing harmful byproducts like dioxins and furans, and could incentivize the continued production of single-use plastics. The groups emphasize that WTE does not address the root causes of the waste crisis and instead perpetuates a system that promotes disposable goods. They call for stronger policies to reduce waste, ban single-use plastics, and promote sustainable alternatives such as zero-waste initiatives.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the opposition to the president's proposal as a scientifically grounded concern, highlighting environmental and health risks associated with WTE technologies. It emphasizes the potential negative impacts of WTE, particularly the promotion of single-use plastics, and advocates for禁

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories