ON
← Back to feed
Groping breasts not part of routine gynaecological examination, says Gauhati High Court
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 hr. ago

Groping breasts not part of routine gynaecological examination, says Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court upheld the conviction of Dr. Anup Kumar Baruah for sexually assaulting a minor patient during a medical consultation in 2009. The court rejected the doctor's claim that his actions were part of a routine gynaecological examination, emphasizing that the victim sought treatment for menstrual irregularities, which did not necessitate exposing her upper body. The court reduced the sentence from two years' imprisonment and a ₹10,000 fine to a ₹5,000 fine due to the doctor's age and the fact that the incident occurred before a 2013 amendment to the Indian Penal Code. The victim's account, supported by her brother and another witness, was deemed credible, and the court directed the fine to be used for victim compensation.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentCenter5 hr. ago
Groping breasts not part of routine gynaecological examination, says Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court upheld the conviction of Dr. Anup Kumar Baruah for sexually assaulting a minor patient during a medical consultation in 2009. The court rejected the doctor's claim that his actions were part of a routine gynaecological examination, emphasizing that the victim sought treatment for menstrual irregularities, which did not necessitate exposing her upper body. The court reduced the sentence from two years' imprisonment and a ₹10,000 fine to a ₹5,000 fine due to the doctor's age and the fact that the incident occurred before a 2013 amendment to the Indian Penal Code. The victim's account, supported by her brother and another witness, was deemed credible, and the court directed the fine to be used for victim compensation.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a legal ruling regarding sexual misconduct by a healthcare professional. It provides factual details of the case, including the court's reasoning, evidence presented, and the outcome. There is no overt ideological framing, and the content remains focused on the judicial process,

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories