ON
← Back to feed
Laura Loomer Defends Calling Angie Nixon a 'Ghetto Black Communist B****'
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter4 hr. ago

Laura Loomer Defends Calling Angie Nixon a 'Ghetto Black Communist B****'

Laura Loomer, a right-wing activist and ally of Donald Trump, defended her use of racially charged language to describe Democratic Senate candidate Angie Nixon, calling her a 'ghetto Black communist b****.' The remarks sparked significant backlash, including from fellow Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene, who condemned the comments as racist and harmful to the party. Loomer continued to justify her statements, claiming she was speaking the 'truth' about Nixon's identity and ideology. Nixon responded by emphasizing her legislative role and criticizing conservative figures like Ashley Moody, whom she accused of misusing public funds. The exchange highlights ongoing tensions within the Republican Party, particularly between more extreme factions like those aligned with Loomer and moderates or establishment figures like Greene.

Mike Collins, the Republican Senate candidate from Georgia, finds himself at the center of a growing controversy over the extremist views of individuals associated with his campaign. On August 28, 2026, The Washington Post reported that a former staffer, Mike Parra, had posted images on his X account depicting himself in Ku Klux Klan robes and a swastika. Parra, a 24-year-old intern and contractor for Collins' political action committee, described himself as a “twink fascist” and used anti-Black slurs, asserting that “the white race contributes more to the world.” While Parra insists he is not a white supremacist, his posts align closely with the ideology of white supremacists. This incident marks yet another troubling episode in Collins’ career, as multiple individuals linked to his office have been scrutinized for their associations with white nationalism or expressions of racism and antisemitism. In July, Collins dismissed his chief of staff, Kip Talley, following reports that he participated in a group chat with Nick Fuentes and Richard Spencer, both prominent white supremacists. Talley had also allegedly assisted Charles Johnson, a Holocaust denier, in securing release from jail. Talley claimed his actions were motivated by a desire to help an acquaintance receive proper medical care. Further complicating the situation, Collins’ son-in-law, David Alan Scheer II, has been found to share Nazi imagery online. Additionally, another former staffer, William Paul, reportedly hurled antisemitic insults at Rep. Mike Lawler (R-New York) during a bar encounter. These incidents suggest a pattern of behavior that extends beyond individual misconduct, reflecting broader trends within the political landscape. Collins himself has faced criticism over his social media activity, with posts labeled as racist and antisemitic. Despite denying these allegations, the repeated association with individuals exhibiting extremist views raises serious concerns about the values upheld by his campaign. The firing of Brandon Phillips, a former staffer who mocked the attempted suicide of a rival's spouse, further underscores the volatile nature of the environment surrounding Collins. The implications of these events extend beyond mere personnel issues. They highlight a concerning shift within the Republican Party, where racist rhetoric appears increasingly intertwined with efforts to mobilize support. Analysts argue that such tactics resonate with certain segments of the electorate, particularly younger voters, who may be drawn to the intensity of these messages. This dynamic suggests a potential strategy aimed at galvanizing a base through provocative language and imagery. The role of staffers in shaping political narratives cannot be overstated. Their actions and beliefs often mirror those of their employers, thereby influencing public perception and policy discussions. The current situation involving Collins illustrates how the choices made in staffing can significantly impact a politician's reputation and effectiveness. As the campaign progresses, the focus will likely remain on how these controversies affect voter trust and the overall viability of Collins' candidacy.

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

Slate logoSlateIndependentProgressiveFactual 40Objective 253 days ago
What This Congressman’s Nazi Staffer Scandal Says About the GOP’s Future

The article discusses the controversy surrounding Rep. Mike Collins' campaign for the U.S. Senate in Georgia, highlighting multiple incidents involving his staff members that suggest extremist views. A former chief of staff, Kip Talley, was linked to a white nationalist group chat and helped a Holocaust denier avoid jail time. Another former staffer, Preston Parra, posted an AI-generated image of himself as a Ku Klux Klan member and used racially charged language. These incidents have raised concerns about the influence of extremist ideologies within Collins' team and their potential impact on the GOP's future.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of Collins' staff as indicative of a broader trend of extremism within the GOP, suggesting a 'dark future' for the party. The emphasis on racial and white supremacist behavior, along with the implication that such influences threaten democratic values, aligns with a左翼/

Why factuality (40): The article includes fabricated information not found in the primary source, including specific names like 'Kip Talley' and 'Nick Fuentes' in a group chat, as well as claims about 'Charles Johnson' being a Holocaust denier. These details are absent from the original text, indicating the article inve

Why objectivity (25): The article presents a highly biased view of the GOP, using phrases like 'dark future for the party' and 'greater extremism' without presenting opposing viewpoints. It frames the situation as indicative of broader trends within the Republican Party, showing clear ideological bias.

Newsweek logoNewsweekIndependentConservative4 hr. ago
Laura Loomer Defends Calling Angie Nixon a 'Ghetto Black Communist B****'

Laura Loomer, a right-wing activist and ally of Donald Trump, defended her use of racially charged language to describe Democratic Senate candidate Angie Nixon, calling her a 'ghetto Black communist b****.' The remarks sparked significant backlash, including from fellow Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene, who condemned the comments as racist and harmful to the party. Loomer continued to justify her statements, claiming she was speaking the 'truth' about Nixon's identity and ideology. Nixon responded by emphasizing her legislative role and criticizing conservative figures like Ashley Moody, whom she accused of misusing public funds. The exchange highlights ongoing tensions within the Republican Party, particularly between more extreme factions like those aligned with Loomer and moderates or establishment figures like Greene.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the controversy around Loomer's use of explicitly racialized and derogatory language, which aligns with the rhetoric often associated with right-wing populist movements. While the article presents both sides (including criticism from Greene), it emphasizes Loomer's defense of her⾔

The Hill logoThe HillIndependentCenter15 hr. ago
Greene condemns Loomer’s rhetoric: ‘This is Trump’s new MAGA and Republican Party’

Former Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene criticized right-wing influencer Laura Loomer for her inflammatory social media comments targeting Democratic state representative Angie Nixon, who is seeking election to the U.S. Senate. Greene described Loomer's rhetoric as representing 'Trump's new MAGA and Republican Party.' The incident highlights tensions within conservative circles over the direction of the Republican Party and the influence of figures like Loomer. Greene, a prominent figure in the GOP, expressed disapproval of Loomer's approach, suggesting a divergence in views among Republicans regarding strategy and messaging. This event reflects broader debates within the party about ideology and tactics.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both Greene's criticism of Loomer and describes Loomer's actions without overtly favoring one side. It reports on the disagreement between two conservative figures without taking a stance on whose perspective is more valid, maintaining a balanced tone.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories