ON
← Back to feed
Construction Inspectorate finds: construction of the Chemical Institute in Ljubljana is illegal
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter3 days ago

Construction Inspectorate finds: construction of the Chemical Institute in Ljubljana is illegal

The Chemical Institute of Ljubljana has been found to have constructed a massive reinforced concrete diaphragm at their site on Hajdrihova Street without obtaining the necessary building permit. This illegal construction was discovered by the Building Inspectorate, which has ordered its removal. The diaphragm, designed to protect surrounding buildings during the demolition of the old structure, was built without proper authorization, violating the Building Act. The institute reportedly spent over two million euros on this unauthorized construction. Local property owner Tilen Erjavec reported damage to his hotel caused by the diaphragm’s construction, prompting him to file an urgent complaint with the Building Inspectorate. The inspectorate has issued an inspection decision requiring the institute to halt construction and remove the structure, citing Article 93 of the Building Act.

The Slovenian Building Inspectorate has confirmed that the construction of a new research centre for gene and cell therapy at the Kemijski Inštitut (Chemical Institute) in Ljubljana is illegal. The institute had begun building a large reinforced concrete diaphragm wall around the site without obtaining a construction permit, which was later ordered to be removed. According to reports, over two million euros have been spent on this unauthorized work. The Kemijski Inštitut, located at Hajdrihova Street in Ljubljana, plans to construct a major Centre for Technology in Gene and Cell Therapy. It had already started building the massive reinforced concrete diaphragm walls, which were meant to protect surrounding buildings during the demolition of the old structure. These walls are 20 meters deep and 60 centimeters wide. However, the institute did not obtain the necessary construction permit, violating the Building Law. This case highlights a known practice in Slovenia, where investors, both individuals and companies, often begin construction before securing official permits, expecting to retroactively adjust the situation. This particular instance involving the Kemijski Inštitut is especially notable due to its implications for legal compliance and environmental protection. The diaphragm walls were initially intended to safeguard neighboring structures during the demolition of the existing building. However, according to Tilen Erjavč, owner of a family-run hotel adjacent to the site, the old building was demolished without a construction permit, and the diaphragm walls were constructed afterward, supposedly to prevent damage to nearby properties. Yet, recent findings suggest that the purpose of these walls was different than originally stated. In February 2026, the Erjavč family submitted an urgent complaint to the Slovenian Environmental Inspectorate (IRSOP) regarding suspected illegal construction activities on the Kemijski Inštitut's premises. They noted that cracks had appeared on their property during the construction phase. The inspectorate requested immediate oversight of the legality of the ongoing works, citing the lack of a construction permit. Inspector Peter Karba, who leads the investigation, confirmed that the construction of the reinforced concrete diaphragm without a valid permit constitutes an illegal object. On June 10, 2026, he issued an inspection decision requiring the removal of the structure. The decision was delivered to the Kemijski Inštitut, though the deadline for voluntary removal has not yet expired. Tilen Erjavč claims that the construction of the diaphragm has already caused damage to his property, even though the main works have not yet commenced. A photo accompanying the report shows the affected area. According to Dr. Gorazd Trpin, an expert in administrative law, the objection raised against the Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning does not suspend the obligation to remove the diaphragm, as the order is enforceable. If the Kemijski Inštitut fails to act, the inspector will arrange for its removal through a licensed contractor, with costs borne by the institution. Despite the ministry’s recent confirmation of the validity of the construction permit for the research centre, the permit explicitly excludes the diaphragm wall. Therefore, the alleged “rectification” of illegal construction does not apply here. The ministry has reaffirmed the validity of the permit solely for the research centre. It is worth noting that more than two million euros have already been spent on the unauthorized diaphragm walls. The planned new research centre is estimated to cost approximately 30 million euros, with the European Union likely playing a role in funding.

1 reports

Info360 logoInfo360IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 703 days ago
Construction Inspectorate finds: construction of the Chemical Institute in Ljubljana is illegal

The Chemical Institute of Ljubljana has been found to have constructed a massive reinforced concrete diaphragm at their site on Hajdrihova Street without obtaining the necessary building permit. This illegal construction was discovered by the Building Inspectorate, which has ordered its removal. The diaphragm, designed to protect surrounding buildings during the demolition of the old structure, was built without proper authorization, violating the Building Act. The institute reportedly spent over two million euros on this unauthorized construction. Local property owner Tilen Erjavec reported damage to his hotel caused by the diaphragm’s construction, prompting him to file an urgent complaint with the Building Inspectorate. The inspectorate has issued an inspection decision requiring the institute to halt construction and remove the structure, citing Article 93 of the Building Act.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about an illegal construction project and the legal actions taken against it. It includes quotes from multiple parties involved, such as the property owner and the Building Inspectorate, and does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing. The报道

Why factuality (85): The article reports on an inspection finding that construction of the GenTech Center at the Chemistry Institute in Ljubljana was illegal due to lack of building permits. It cites the inspector’s findings and mentions the estimated cost of over 2 million euros. The article references local practices

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the situation as a legal violation but frames it through the perspective of a local hotel owner who has a vested interest in the area. There is some emotional language around the 'deception' by the authorities and the impact on nearby properties. The tone leans slightly towards

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories