Mr Stevanovic speaks faster than he thinks

Former head of the Security Information Service (VIS), once a notable member of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS), and former deputy speaker of the National Assembly, Miha Brejc, has publicly called for the replacement of the current president of the National Assembly, whom he claims damages Slovenia’s reputation. According to a statement published on August 19, 2026, by PlusPortal, Brejc asserts that the president should resign immediately without any assistance from political parties. He has created a website, stevogohome.si, which serves as a platform for his call for the president's resignation. In a surprising turn of events, Brejc appeared on both TV Slovenia and POP TV on Tuesday, during which he expressed personal grievances against the president. Brejc's actions have sparked a wave of public reaction, with some supporters expressing solidarity while others remain critical. The incident took place amid ongoing discussions about the role and influence of the National Assembly president within the country's political framework. Brejc, who is currently retired, previously held key positions in government and was known for his involvement in national security matters. His recent comments mark a rare public challenge to a high-ranking official, highlighting potential tensions within the political sphere. The controversy surrounding Brejc's remarks has led to increased scrutiny of the National Assembly president's conduct and decisions. Some analysts suggest that this situation could lead to further political maneuvering, especially given the upcoming legislative sessions. Brejc's decision to go public with his concerns appears to be a calculated move aimed at influencing public opinion and possibly prompting internal party dynamics to shift. In addition to his public statements, Brejc has taken steps to manage the online discourse around his actions. PlusPortal has implemented measures to limit harmful commentary and spam content, adjusting its comment moderation policy accordingly. This effort reflects the broader challenges faced by media platforms in maintaining a constructive dialogue amidst heightened political tensions. The implications of Brejc's actions extend beyond immediate political consequences. They raise questions about the balance of power within governmental institutions and the mechanisms available for dissenting voices to engage with authority figures. As the situation unfolds, observers will be watching closely to see how these developments impact the stability and functionality of the National Assembly. As of now, there are no indications that Brejc intends to pursue legal action against the president or any other officials. Instead, his focus seems to be on leveraging public support through his online campaign. The outcome of this situation will likely depend on the responses from both the political establishment and the general public, as well as any further developments in the ongoing debate over governance and accountability.