The article discusses the legal status of 'tatvina' (a form of minor assault) under Slovenia's new emergency measures law (ZNUZJV). Between November 27 and December 31 of last year, police handled 846 cases of tatvina under this law. Vinko Gorenak, a cabinet secretary, claimed on his blog that the 'Golobova government legalized tatvina,' suggesting that the government allowed such actions. However, Marko Balažic, a criminologist, explains that reclassifying minor tatvina from a criminal act to a traffic offense changes its legal definition and procedural handling. He notes that while anyone can detain someone suspected of a criminal act, only authorized persons can handle traffic offenses, which has led to debate over the legality and practical implications of this change. The Constitutional Court has been asked to evaluate the constitutionality of Article 12 of ZNUZJV, which defines the offense of tatvina.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the reclassification of tatvina as a controversial legal shift, emphasizing concerns raised by experts like Balažic about its impact on legal procedures and rights. While the article presents both perspectives (Gorenak’s claim versus Balažic’s analysis), the emphasis on the legal,


