ON
← Back to feed
After years of wrangling in the courts, a landmark decision has been made in the divorce of famous actor
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 hr. ago

After years of wrangling in the courts, a landmark decision has been made in the divorce of famous actor

A California court has ruled on the financial aspects of the high-profile divorce between actor Ioan Gruffudd and his ex-wife Alice Evans. The court rejected most of Gruffudd's financial claims and ordered him to pay Alice 10% of his gross income moving forward, which amounts to approximately $1,862 per month. This decision concludes another phase of a lengthy legal battle marked by mutual accusations, financial disputes, and custody battles over their children. The court acknowledged Alice's allegations of emotional distress caused by her behavior on social media but stated such conduct does not constitute a legal barrier to her claim under California family law. The ruling also noted that Alice faced financial difficulties after their separation in 2021, having spent her savings to cover living expenses and care for their daughters. However, the court criticized her for failing to promptly disclose a savings account, deeming this omission to have compromised her credibility during the proceedings.

1 reports

Večernji list logoVečernji listIndependentCenter7 hr. ago
After years of wrangling in the courts, a landmark decision has been made in the divorce of famous actor

A California court has ruled on the financial aspects of the high-profile divorce between actor Ioan Gruffudd and his ex-wife Alice Evans. The court rejected most of Gruffudd's financial claims and ordered him to pay Alice 10% of his gross income moving forward, which amounts to approximately $1,862 per month. This decision concludes another phase of a lengthy legal battle marked by mutual accusations, financial disputes, and custody battles over their children. The court acknowledged Alice's allegations of emotional distress caused by her behavior on social media but stated such conduct does not constitute a legal barrier to her claim under California family law. The ruling also noted that Alice faced financial difficulties after their separation in 2021, having spent her savings to cover living expenses and care for their daughters. However, the court criticized her for failing to promptly disclose a savings account, deeming this omission to have compromised her credibility during the proceedings.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced report of the court's decision, including both parties' arguments and the court's reasoning. It does not take a clear ideological stance, nor does it emphasize one side's perspective over the other. While the subject involves personal finances and family law, the tone

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories