ON
← Back to feed
Violence during the election campaign Two thirds of the destroyed election posters in Berlin belong to the AfD
Germany🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative

Violence during the election campaign Two thirds of the destroyed election posters in Berlin belong to the AfD

During the Berlin election campaign, at least 1,252 electoral posters have been damaged, with 801 of them belonging to the Alternative for Germany (AfD). According to police statistics, the majority of these incidents occurred in the district of Treptow-Köpenick, where 282 AfD posters were destroyed. The Christian Democratic Union (CDU) came second with 148 damaged posters, followed by independent candidates, the Left Party, and the Social Democratic Party (SPD). Attacks against AfD members and campaign workers have also increased, with 18 cases involving AfD individuals since early August. These attacks include verbal abuse, intimidation, and physical assaults. Additionally, nine of the 16 reported crimes targeting party offices and information stands since August 2 involved the AfD, with six occurring in Treptow-Köpenick. The police note that the actual number of incidents may be higher due to unreported cases.

Police in Berlin recorded around 500 incidents during the final phase of the city’s election campaign, including over 380 acts of property damage, 12 physical assaults, six threats, and 22 insults. These figures, released by local authorities on September 18, mark a sharp increase compared to previous elections. During the 2021 state assembly election, police documented approximately 120 criminal cases, though comparable data for the February 2023 repeat election could not be retrieved. This year’s surge in disturbances reflects heightened tensions ahead of the September 20 vote for the Berlin Senate and twelve district councils. More than 1,000 campaign posters were damaged or removed, with the AfD suffering the highest number of attacks. According to police records, 652 of the affected posters were associated with the AfD, followed by the CDU with 145, the Left (Linke) with 94, the SPD with 70, the FDP with 37, and the Greens with 33. Physical assaults were also predominantly directed at members of the AfD, with six confirmed cases of bodily harm. On Wednesday morning, police responded to an incident in Reinickendorf involving a cyclist who reportedly shoved a 61-year-old AfD volunteer and threw informational materials onto the wet ground. The cyclist was detained by a witness before police arrived, and the volunteer sustained a leg injury. The case is being investigated by the police’s political crime unit. The campaign period began on August 2, allowing parties to distribute posters throughout the city. Election officials emphasized that these numbers represent only the cases known to them, suggesting the true extent of disruptions may be higher. Similar statistics from past campaigns were not immediately available, highlighting the current escalation in conflict. Separately, a video circulating on social media falsely claimed to show a man destroying ballots for the AfD in Berlin using a carpet knife. The clip, which gained widespread attention, was debunked by the Berlin State Returning Officer, Stephan Bröchler. He stated that the documents depicted in the video were not authentic election materials. The envelopes shown did not match official ones, and the sealing method raised suspicions. According to official guidelines, postal voters receive a specific package containing a voter declaration, two envelopes, and ballot papers. The video showed discrepancies, including the absence of the required declaration and an incomplete set of ballots. Additionally, the presence of bins marked with a modified version of Berlin’s coat of arms, specifically the Berlin bear, was noted as unusual and unapproved by election authorities. Bröchler concluded that the video was likely designed to undermine confidence in postal voting. Meanwhile, interviews conducted with young Turkish-German residents in areas such as Neukölln, Kreuzberg, Wedding, and Spandau revealed growing disillusionment with mainstream parties and increasing support for the AfD. Of the 25 individuals surveyed, 19 had voted in the February 2025 federal election, with 11 indicating they would change their choice this time. Eleven of these respondents planned to vote for the AfD, reflecting a shift away from traditional parties like the SPD and CDU. Many described feeling abandoned by political institutions, citing issues such as housing shortages, economic instability, and rising crime. One participant, Deniz, recounted a difficult experience searching for affordable housing, describing the process as dehumanizing. She chose to vote in person on September 20, stating she felt it was a more decisive act than absentee voting. Her decision aligns with broader trends among younger Turkish-German communities, who increasingly see the AfD as a means to reclaim a sense of order and stability. Other interviewees expressed frustration with the government’s handling of migration and economic policies. Some had previously supported the CDU or SPD but found themselves disillusioned by perceived failures. Others, like Caner and Süleyman, cited dissatisfaction with how both major parties addressed societal challenges. Despite their varied backgrounds, many of those interviewed described a common sentiment: that the political center had failed to address their concerns effectively. Their support for the AfD stems less from ideological alignment and more from a desire for change, even if that change involves embracing a different political perspective. Overall, the combination of rising electoral tensions, misinformation campaigns, and shifting voter allegiances underscores the complex dynamics shaping the upcoming vote. As the campaign enters its final stretch, the situation in Berlin continues to reflect deepening divisions and evolving expectations from the electorate.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Junge Freiheit logoJunge FreiheitIndependentConservativeFactual 95Objective 70
Violence during the election campaign Two thirds of the destroyed election posters in Berlin belong to the AfD

During the Berlin election campaign, at least 1,252 electoral posters have been damaged, with 801 of them belonging to the Alternative for Germany (AfD). According to police statistics, the majority of these incidents occurred in the district of Treptow-Köpenick, where 282 AfD posters were destroyed. The Christian Democratic Union (CDU) came second with 148 damaged posters, followed by independent candidates, the Left Party, and the Social Democratic Party (SPD). Attacks against AfD members and campaign workers have also increased, with 18 cases involving AfD individuals since early August. These attacks include verbal abuse, intimidation, and physical assaults. Additionally, nine of the 16 reported crimes targeting party offices and information stands since August 2 involved the AfD, with six occurring in Treptow-Köpenick. The police note that the actual number of incidents may be higher due to unreported cases.

Bias read (Conservative): The article highlights the disproportionate damage to AfD posters and attacks on their members compared to other parties, which could imply a negative framing of the AfD. However, the content primarily presents factual data from the police without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. The '

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the statistics from the Berlin police regarding the destruction of election posters, citing 1252 total cases with 801 targeting the AfD. It also mentions specific districts where this occurred, aligning closely with the primary source. The details about attacks on AfD

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the facts but uses phrases like 'Gewalt im Wahlkampf' (violence in the campaign) and describes incidents with some emotional language such as 'verbal angegriffen' (verbally attacked) and 'schubste den 40-jährigen Politiker' (pushed the 40-year-old politician). These descriptions

Die Zeit logoDie ZeitIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 80
Elections: Posters damaged, aid workers attacked around 500 incidents

In Berlin sind kurz vor dem Ende des Wahlkampfs für das Abgeordnetenhaus und die Bezirksverordnetenversammlungen rund 500 Straftaten gemeldet worden, darunter 380 Sachbeschädigungen, 12 Körperverletzungen, 6 Bedrohungen und 22 Beleidigungen. Die Polizei berichtete, dass besonders häufig Plakate der Parteien beschädigt oder entfernt wurden, wobei die AfD mit 652 Beschädigungen am stärksten betroffen war. Bei tätlichen Angriffen war ebenfalls die AfD am häufigsten betroffen. In einem Fall wurde ein Wahlhelfer der AfD während eines Infostands angegriffen und am Bein verletzt. Die Polizei untersucht die Vorfälle unter anderem im Zusammenhang mit politischen Straftaten.

Bias read (Center): Die Berichterstattung bleibt sachlich und neutral, ohne klare politische Prägung. Die Daten werden objektiv präsentiert, und es wird keine emotionale oder parteiliche Bewertung der Vorfälle gegeben. Die Polizei wird als Quelle genannt, und es wird keine bevorzugte Behandlung einer bestimmten Partei,

Why factuality (75): Der Artikel berichtet über die Polizei-Erfassung von 500 Straftaten während des Wahlkampfs in Berlin, basierend auf offiziellen Polizeiangaben. Die Daten sind konkret und können mit dem Primärquelltext abgeglichen werden. Allerdings fehlen Kontextualisierungen zu den politischen Hintergründen der An

Why objectivity (80): Der Artikel bleibt sachlich und berichtet neutral über die Ereignisse. Es gibt keine klare politische Richtung oder emotionale Bewertung der Vorfälle. Die Darstellung ist ausgewogen und informativ.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories