ON
← Back to feed
German journalist questions claims about Sarajevo safari
Serbia🏛️ Politics6 hr. ago

German journalist questions claims about Sarajevo safari

German journalist Michael Martens of Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung has written an article challenging the 'Sarajevo safari' narrative, which claims that wealthy foreigners paid to shoot civilians during the siege of Sarajevo. Martens interviewed multiple individuals familiar with the siege, including Franciscan friar Mirko Majdandzic and former Hague prosecutor, and found no credible evidence supporting the existence of such organized sniper tourism. He argues that the story is primarily based on a documentary film and two books relying on anonymous or deceased witnesses, and that survivors and experts contradict the claims. Martens points out that US firefighter John Jordan was the only witness at the Hague Tribunal to mention alleged foreign sniper tourists, while thousands of others did not. He concludes that there is no substantial evidence for the 'safari' claims and suggests the story serves as a distraction from identifying real war criminals.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

N1 Srbija logoN1 SrbijaIndependentCenter6 hr. ago
German journalist questions claims about Sarajevo safari

German journalist Michael Martens of Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung has written an article challenging the 'Sarajevo safari' narrative, which claims that wealthy foreigners paid to shoot civilians during the siege of Sarajevo. Martens interviewed multiple individuals familiar with the siege, including Franciscan friar Mirko Majdandzic and former Hague prosecutor, and found no credible evidence supporting the existence of such organized sniper tourism. He argues that the story is primarily based on a documentary film and two books relying on anonymous or deceased witnesses, and that survivors and experts contradict the claims. Martens points out that US firefighter John Jordan was the only witness at the Hague Tribunal to mention alleged foreign sniper tourists, while thousands of others did not. He concludes that there is no substantial evidence for the 'safari' claims and suggests the story serves as a distraction from identifying real war criminals.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced examination of the 'Sarajevo safari' claim by citing multiple perspectives and expert opinions. It does not take a clear ideological stance but rather investigates the credibility of the narrative through interviews and historical records. While the topic relates to a

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories