BEThe Court of Audit (Rekenhof) has criticized the distribution of funds for bicycle paths and tunnels, stating it lacks a long-term vision, is influenced by lobbying, and involves sloppy budgeting.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on an audit finding without overtly favoring any political side. It presents the critique of the funding distribution as identified by the Court of Audit, which is an official source. The framing appears balanced, focusing on the findings rather than taking a stance.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports the findings of the Court of Audit regarding the lack of long-term vision, lobbying, and messy budgets in the allocation of funds for bike paths and tunnels. The claims are supported by the audit's conclusions. However, the title and tone suggest a critical stance, usi
![A European country has dug a "second state" under the mountains: more than 1,400 tunnels, some 2,000 kilometers [1,200 mi] long, almost unnoticed during the journey](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=n1info.ba%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2F2026%2F6%2F23%2F1782224916_Screenshot_2026-06-23_161035.width-1200.png&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)