ON
← Back to feed
Ratko Mladić commemorated: The last rites for the war criminal
Germany🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives9/8/2026

Ratko Mladić commemorated: The last rites for the war criminal

Tausende Menschen nahmen an Trauerfeierlichkeiten in Belgrad teil, um den verstorbenen Kriegsverbrecher Ratko Mladić zu gedenken. Mladić starb nach einer lebenslangen Gefängnisstrafe wegen Kriegsverbrechen, Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit und Völkermord. Seine Leiche wurde auf dem Topčider-Friedhof beigesetzt, wobei viele Teilnehmer serbische Flaggen und Porträts von Mladić trugen. Serbiens Präsident Aleksandar Vučić nahm nicht am Trauerzug teil, was als Zeichen für diplomatische Vorsicht interpretiert wurde. Die EU kritisierte die Feierlichkeiten als unvereinbar mit ihren Werten, insbesondere hinsichtlich der Auseinandersetzung mit der Vergangenheit und der Anerkennung der Opfer. Nur wenige serbische Menschenrechtsaktivisten und Intellektuelle kritisieren öffentlich die Verherrlichung von Mladić.

EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressed shock at the solemn burial ceremony of Ratko Mladić, a convicted war criminal who was found guilty of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. She described the images of the funeral in Belgrade as “shocking” and criticized the official support shown by Serbian authorities. Mladić, who died in custody last month after serving a life sentence for his role in the Srebrenica massacre, was buried with military honors despite being a war criminal. His funeral drew thousands of attendees, including government officials and members of the military. Von der Leyen emphasized that Mladić was responsible for some of the worst atrocities in Europe since World War II, particularly the killing of around 8,000 Muslim men and boys during the Srebrenica massacre in 1995. She noted that his death occurred while he was serving a life sentence for these crimes, which she said should have been a moment of reflection rather than celebration. The presence of high-ranking Serbian officials at the funeral, she argued, contradicted the values that underpin Serbia's aspirations to join the European Union. Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić did not attend the funeral, citing a state visit to Uzbekistan as the reason. However, several government ministers and officials from the Republika Srpska attended the event. The funeral took place at the Topčider Cemetery in Belgrade, where Mladić was laid to rest alongside his daughter Ana, who committed suicide in 1994 amid the ethnic violence of the 1990s. The funeral included traditional Orthodox rituals, such as mourners bowing over the coffin and touching its wood as a sign of respect. Many attendees carried Serbian flags and pictures of Mladić, reflecting his status as a controversial national figure. Despite the absence of Vučić, the event was marked by the participation of numerous high-profile individuals, raising concerns among European leaders about the normalization of figures associated with wartime atrocities. The European Union has long criticized Serbia for its lack of reconciliation with its past, particularly regarding the legacy of the wars in the Balkans. The country has been an EU candidate since 2012, but accession talks have stalled due to concerns over Serbia's adherence to democratic principles and its close ties with Russia and China. The funeral of Mladić has reignited debates about whether Serbia is truly committed to confronting its historical responsibilities. Other EU officials, including Foreign Affairs Commissioner Kaja Kallas, condemned the event as a glorification of war crimes and a form of historical revisionism incompatible with EU values. They stressed the importance of accountability, reconciliation, and respect for victims of war crimes. These criticisms highlight ongoing tensions between Serbia and the EU, particularly concerning how the country addresses its past and aligns itself with European norms. Serbia's approach to commemorating figures like Mladić has drawn criticism from human rights activists and intellectuals within the country, who argue that such events prevent genuine societal reckoning with the past. Critics suggest that the funeral served more as a political maneuver to bolster nationalist sentiments rather than a sincere act of remembrance. The international community continues to monitor Serbia's progress toward EU membership, with the handling of historical issues playing a crucial role in determining the pace of accession negotiations. As the debate over Mladić's legacy unfolds, the response from both Serbian authorities and the EU will shape future discussions on reconciliation and integration into European institutions.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Die Zeit logoDie ZeitIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 759/8/2026
Serbia: Von der Leyen 'shocked' by the funeral of Ratko Mladić

Die EU-Kommissionspräsidentin Ursula von der Leyen hat die feierliche Beisetzung des verurteilten Kriegsverbrechers Ratko Mladić in Serbien scharf kritisiert. Sie bezeichnete die Trauerfeier als schockierend und betonte, dass Mladić für Völkermorde und Kriegsverbrechen verantwortlich war, darunter das Massaker von Srebrenica 1995, bei dem etwa 8.000 Muslime getötet wurden. Von der Leyen verurteilte zudem die Teilnahme höherer serbischer Beamter an der Beisetzung, was sie als Zeichen von Versagen bei der Auseinandersetzung mit der Vergangenheit und als Widerspruch zu den Werten der EU deutete. Mladić war 2017 vom Internationalen Strafgerichtshof wegen Völkermords verurteilt worden und starb im Gefängnis im Alter von 84 Jahren.

Bias read (Progressive): Der Artikel betont die Kritik der EU gegenüber Serbiens Umgang mit der historischen Vergangenheit und verurteilt die Feierlichkeit der Beisetzung Mladićs als politisch problematisch. Die Sprache ist klar moralisch eingestellt und verbindet die Beisetzung direkt mit der EU-Integration Serbiens, was k

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports Ursula von der Leyen's criticism of the funeral, citing her social media post and referencing Mladić's convictions and the Srebrenica massacre. It includes specific dates and legal outcomes, aligning with verified sources. The article also references the EU's stance on

Why objectivity (75): While the article presents von der Leyen's criticism directly, it maintains a neutral tone by quoting her statements without adding subjective commentary. It acknowledges the political implications but avoids taking sides beyond reporting the official EU position.

taz – die tageszeitung logotaz – die tageszeitungIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 609/7/2026
Ratko Mladić commemorated: The last rites for the war criminal

Tausende Menschen nahmen an Trauerfeierlichkeiten in Belgrad teil, um den verstorbenen Kriegsverbrecher Ratko Mladić zu gedenken. Mladić starb nach einer lebenslangen Gefängnisstrafe wegen Kriegsverbrechen, Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit und Völkermord. Seine Leiche wurde auf dem Topčider-Friedhof beigesetzt, wobei viele Teilnehmer serbische Flaggen und Porträts von Mladić trugen. Serbiens Präsident Aleksandar Vučić nahm nicht am Trauerzug teil, was als Zeichen für diplomatische Vorsicht interpretiert wurde. Die EU kritisierte die Feierlichkeiten als unvereinbar mit ihren Werten, insbesondere hinsichtlich der Auseinandersetzung mit der Vergangenheit und der Anerkennung der Opfer. Nur wenige serbische Menschenrechtsaktivisten und Intellektuelle kritisieren öffentlich die Verherrlichung von Mladić.

Bias read (Progressive): Die Berichterstattung betont die Kritik der EU und der Menschenrechtsaktivisten an der Verherrlichung von Mladić, während sie die staatliche Haltung Serbiens und die Diplomatie Vučićs relativ neutral beschreibt. Der Fokus liegt auf der internationalen Reaktion und der moralischen Kritik an der serbı

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the public funeral of Ratko Mladić in Belgrade, including details about his death in UN custody, his military honors, and the attendance by thousands. It mentions his conviction for war crimes and genocide, aligning with known historical facts. However, it does not men

Why objectivity (60): The tone is reverential and emphasizes the respect shown during the funeral, which can be seen as emotionally charged. While it provides factual information, it frames the event as a dignified farewell rather than acknowledging the controversy surrounding Mladić’s actions.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories