ON
← Back to feed
US, Iran agree to extend ceasefire, Pakistani sources say
TR🏛️ PoliticsCenter10 days ago

US, Iran agree to extend ceasefire, Pakistani sources say

On August 12, Turkish state-run Anadolu Agency reported that the U.S. and Iran have agreed to extend a 60-day ceasefire under the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding, which was set to expire on August 17. The report cited Pakistani sources, noting ongoing communication between the two nations to determine the extension period. While neither side nor the mediators have officially confirmed the agreement, the development follows previous ceasefire discussions brokered by Pakistan since April. Talks had stalled over issues including security guarantees and freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route for global energy and trade. Pakistan’s Defense Minister expressed optimism about reaching a peace arrangement, while the country’s Interior Minister visited Iran to discuss regional security and stability.

Iran dismissed U.S. assertions of control over the Strait of Hormuz, asserting that the critical waterway falls under its jurisdiction and management. A senior Iranian official, Hossein Taeb, head of the Basij paramilitary group, made the claim via the semi-official Fars news agency, responding directly to remarks by U.S. President Donald Trump who had earlier declared American dominance over the strait. Trump had posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, stating that the U.S. maintains "total control" of the strategic passage and would continue to do so. His comments followed a series of airstrikes targeting Iran’s military infrastructure and leadership, part of a broader campaign initiated in February aimed at pressuring Tehran to abandon its nuclear ambitions and alter its governance. Taeb accused the United States of attempting to undermine Iran’s influence in the region by instigating conflict in the Strait of Hormuz, but he insisted that these efforts had failed. He emphasized that Iran continues to operate within a secure framework, maintaining its sovereignty over the waterway. This assertion comes amid ongoing hostilities between the two nations, with Iran retaliating against U.S. and Israeli strikes through missile attacks on military installations and shipping lanes in the region. Despite the escalation, the conflict appears to have reached a stalemate, particularly as Trump faces declining domestic support ahead of the November midterm elections. In addition to military tensions, Iran has introduced new economic considerations into the dispute. The country’s foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, stated that Iran planned to implement a toll system for vessels traversing the Strait of Hormuz due to environmental degradation linked to maritime activity. Baghaei highlighted the extensive ecological damage caused by decades of shipping traffic in the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman, estimating the cost in the trillions of dollars. He pointed to a recent oil spill near Iran’s Qeshm Island, attributing it to a foreign vessel, as justification for the proposed fees. While no specific environmental initiatives were outlined, the move underscores Iran’s intent to leverage the strait’s significance for both economic and geopolitical advantage. Efforts to de-escalate the situation have included diplomatic engagements involving third-party mediators. According to reports from the Turkish state-run Anadolu Agency, the U.S. and Iran reportedly agreed to extend a 60-day ceasefire under a Pakistan-mediated agreement. The original ceasefire, brokered in April, was formalized in a memorandum of understanding signed in June. However, discussions had stalled due to disputes over security assurances and navigational rights in the Strait of Hormuz. Recent statements from Pakistani officials suggest renewed momentum toward a potential resolution, with Defense Minister Khawaja Asif indicating that progress is being made toward a peace accord. Pakistani Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi traveled to Iran to engage in discussions regarding regional security and stability, meeting with top Iranian officials including President Masoud Pezeshkian and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Naqvi’s involvement reflects Pakistan’s role as a mediator in the ongoing negotiations, leveraging its proximity to both nations and its historical ties to Iran. The visit highlights the continued interest in finding a diplomatic solution to ease tensions in the region. Despite these developments, neither the U.S. nor Iran has officially confirmed the reported ceasefire extension. Mediators remain cautious, acknowledging the complexity of reaching a lasting agreement given the deep-seated differences between the two nations. The status of the Strait of Hormuz remains a focal point, with both sides vying for influence over one of the world’s most crucial maritime corridors. The outcome of these negotiations could significantly impact global energy markets and regional stability, as the strait facilitates a substantial portion of the world’s oil shipments.

2 reports

Daily Sabah logoDaily SabahParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 7010 days ago
Iran dismisses US claims to reiterate control over Strait of Hormuz

A senior Iranian official, Hossein Taeb, asserted that Iran maintains control over the Strait of Hormuz, countering recent claims by U.S. President Donald Trump who stated the U.S. has 'total control' of the strategic waterway. This comes amid ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Iran, with Trump having previously threatened to maintain a naval blockade in the area. Iran has responded to U.S. military actions, including airstrikes targeting its military infrastructure, by conducting missile attacks and disrupting shipping in the strait, causing economic ripple effects globally. Additionally, Iran has proposed imposing tolls on ships passing through the strait, citing environmental damage caused by maritime traffic.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both Iranian and U.S. perspectives without overtly favoring one side. It quotes statements from both parties and provides context regarding their respective positions and actions, maintaining a balanced approach.

Why factuality (85): The article reports statements from Iranian officials and U.S. President Trump regarding control of the Strait of Hormuz. It provides context about the historical claims and recent actions, aligning with the cross-source consensus that both nations claim control over the strait. However, it does not

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the perspectives of both Iran and the U.S., but uses emotionally charged language such as 'defeated' and 'war' when describing Iran's stance. It also emphasizes Trump's repeated claims without balancing them with counterpoints or contextual analysis.

Hurriyet Daily News logoHurriyet Daily NewsParty-alignedCenterFactual 75Objective 8011 days ago
US, Iran agree to extend ceasefire, Pakistani sources say

On August 12, Turkish state-run Anadolu Agency reported that the U.S. and Iran have agreed to extend a 60-day ceasefire under the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding, which was set to expire on August 17. The report cited Pakistani sources, noting ongoing communication between the two nations to determine the extension period. While neither side nor the mediators have officially confirmed the agreement, the development follows previous ceasefire discussions brokered by Pakistan since April. Talks had stalled over issues including security guarantees and freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route for global energy and trade. Pakistan’s Defense Minister expressed optimism about reaching a peace arrangement, while the country’s Interior Minister visited Iran to discuss regional security and stability.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information based on reports from Turkish state media and Pakistani officials without overtly endorsing any particular political stance. It provides balanced reporting on the ceasefire extension, citing multiple sources and acknowledging the lack of confirmation from both sides.

Why factuality (75): The article discusses a reported ceasefire extension between the U.S. and Iran, citing Pakistani sources and the Turkish state-run Anadolu Agency. While it acknowledges the lack of confirmation from the parties involved, it aligns with the broader narrative of ongoing mediation efforts and ceasefire

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting information from multiple sources without overt bias. It avoids emotionally charged language and focuses on reporting the facts as they are presented by the sources, though it does mention political figures with potential influence.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories