ON
← Back to feed
Gates Foundation says no payments were made towards Epstein, following internal investigation
IL🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 hr. ago

Gates Foundation says no payments were made towards Epstein, following internal investigation

The Gates Foundation announced the results of an internal investigation conducted by law firm WilmerHale, which found no evidence of financial payments or involvement in criminal activities related to Jeffrey Epstein. The investigation, initiated after the foundation opened an external review earlier this year, included 50 interviews with former and current employees and a review of extensive written materials. The foundation stated it had only contacted Epstein twice between 2011 and 2014—one regarding a proposed donor-advised fund and another involving the International Peace Institute (IPI), where the foundation provided grant funding for polio eradication. The findings come amid ongoing scrutiny of Epstein's connections and the role of prominent figures like Bill Gates and Prince Andrew.

The Gates Foundation announced on July 21, 2026, that no payments were made toward Jeffrey Epstein, following an internal investigation. The philanthropic organization stated that an external review, led by the law firm WilmerHale, found no evidence of financial transactions or involvement in criminal activities related to the late financier and convicted sex offender. The investigation was initiated earlier this year after the foundation decided to examine its engagement with Epstein. The review was commissioned by CEO Mark Suzman and supported by Bill Gates, the foundation’s chair, along with independent board members. Over 50 interviews were conducted with former and current employees, and extensive written materials were examined throughout the process. Epstein, who died in 2021, was a controversial figure known for his alleged crimes involving sexual misconduct. His connections to prominent individuals have drawn scrutiny over the years. According to the foundation’s findings, it had contact with Epstein on two occasions between 2011 and 2014. The first instance involved a proposed donor-advised fund (DAF) aimed at pooling contributions from high-net-worth individuals to support global public health initiatives. However, the foundation ultimately rejected the proposal. The second interaction occurred through the International Peace Institute (IPI), a nonprofit organization that Epstein introduced to the foundation’s chair. Following internal due diligence, the Gates Foundation provided grant funding to the IPI for polio eradication efforts. The foundation emphasized that all actions taken were in compliance with its ethical standards and legal obligations. The investigation was prompted by growing public interest and media attention surrounding Epstein’s past associations. The foundation’s decision to conduct an external review reflects its commitment to transparency and accountability. The findings were shared publicly to address concerns and provide clarity regarding its historical interactions with Epstein. Bill Gates and Prince Andrew, formerly known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, were among the figures associated with Epstein. A handout image from the House Oversight Committee revealed their presence in connection with Epstein’s estate, highlighting the broader implications of their relationships. The Gates Foundation’s announcement comes amid ongoing discussions about the role of wealthy individuals in supporting charitable causes and the potential for misuse of resources. While the foundation maintains that its actions were appropriate, critics argue that further transparency is needed to fully understand the extent of its involvement with Epstein. As the situation develops, the foundation has indicated it will continue to monitor and respond to any new information or inquiries. The case underscores the complexities of navigating high-profile relationships within the nonprofit sector and the importance of rigorous oversight mechanisms. The foundation’s response serves as a step toward addressing public concerns and maintaining trust in its operations.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 657 hr. ago
Gates Foundation says no payments were made towards Epstein, following internal investigation

The Gates Foundation announced the results of an internal investigation conducted by law firm WilmerHale, which found no evidence of financial payments or involvement in criminal activities related to Jeffrey Epstein. The investigation, initiated after the foundation opened an external review earlier this year, included 50 interviews with former and current employees and a review of extensive written materials. The foundation stated it had only contacted Epstein twice between 2011 and 2014—one regarding a proposed donor-advised fund and another involving the International Peace Institute (IPI), where the foundation provided grant funding for polio eradication. The findings come amid ongoing scrutiny of Epstein's connections and the role of prominent figures like Bill Gates and Prince Andrew.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the findings of an investigation conducted by the Gates Foundation, emphasizing the lack of evidence for financial payments or criminal involvement. While the subject involves high-profile individuals and potential ethical concerns, the framing remains neutral, citing official调查

Why factuality (75): The article reports that the Gates Foundation's external review found no evidence of payments or participation in criminal activities related to Jeffrey Epstein. This aligns with the cross-source consensus that the foundation did not make payments to Epstein. However, the article does not provide fu

Why objectivity (65): The article presents the findings of the Gates Foundation's investigation but uses emotionally charged language such as 'convicted sex offender' and references to political figures like Prince Andrew. It also frames the issue in a way that may imply controversy without providing balanced context.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories