The number of millionaires in Britain has reached its lowest level in 20 years, according to a report released by the Adam Smith Institute (ASI), a free-market think tank. The figure stands at 442,000, marking a 7 per cent drop from 2024 and the smallest number since the 2008 financial crisis. The decline is attributed to factors such as high taxation, threats of further tax increases, including a proposed wealth tax, and changes in policies affecting non-resident taxpayers. The report highlights the negative consequences of these trends, noting that the top 1 per cent of earners contribute 29 per cent of income tax. The ASI used data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Wealth and Assets Survey, which is conducted every two years. The report adjusted the data to reflect the number of millionaires in constant 2025 pounds, accounting for inflation and currency fluctuations. The findings indicate a decrease in inflation-adjusted asset prices and a reduced household savings rate, both contributing to the decline in the number of millionaires. The report warns that each millionaire who leaves the country represents a loss to the economy, reducing capital available for British businesses and weakening the entrepreneurial spirit. The issue of wealth taxation has become a focal point in the debate surrounding the economic landscape of the UK. Over 100 British-based millionaires, including prominent figures such as Gary Lineker, Richard Curtis, and Gary Stevenson, have called on Prime Minister Andy Burnham to implement a wealth tax. In an open letter organized by Patriotic Millionaires UK, these individuals stated that they are willing to pay more taxes, specifically targeting the wealthiest individuals whose income is derived from accumulated wealth rather than regular employment. The letter emphasized that such a tax would not burden those earning wages but would focus on the richest segment of the population. The proposed wealth tax, a 2 per cent levy on wealth exceeding £10 million, could generate approximately £24 billion annually, according to campaigners. Additionally, Patriotic Millionaires advocate for reforms to capital gains tax, aiming to align it with income tax rates, which could yield another £12 billion annually. The movement gained traction following a similar campaign in the United States, where nearly 400 millionaires participated in a call for higher taxes during the World Economic Forum in Davos last year. Patriotic Millionaires, established in response to perceived inequalities and concerns about democratic erosion, seeks to promote fair taxation and reduce the undue influence of wealth in politics. Reactions to the proposal have varied. While some, like Tory business spokesman Andrew Griffith, expressed concern over the potential exodus of wealthy individuals, others, including members of Patriotic Millionaires, view the initiative as necessary for addressing growing inequality. Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride criticized the government for not clarifying how its spending promises would be funded, emphasizing the need for transparency in fiscal planning. Meanwhile, the letter from Patriotic Millionaires underscores the belief that the wealthiest can afford to contribute more to ensure a more equitable distribution of resources and opportunities. Public opinion on the proposed wealth tax has shown mixed responses. While many support the idea, they emphasize the necessity of closing existing loopholes to prevent tax evasion. Suggestions include implementing exit taxes, tightening reporting requirements, and ensuring that tax advisors adhere to strict regulations. Critics argue that without robust mechanisms to prevent circumvention, the effectiveness of the tax could be undermined. Some readers even question the need for legislative action, pointing out that millionaires could voluntarily donate to the Treasury without waiting for new laws. Despite these concerns, the call for a more progressive taxation system continues to gain momentum, reflecting broader societal discussions on equity and fiscal responsibility.
12 reports
Daily MailIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 654 days agoThe number of millionaires in Britain has dropped to the lowest level in 20 years, according to a report by the free-market think tank Adam Smith Institute (ASI). The decline, attributed to high taxation, threats of a wealth tax, the abolition of the non-dom regime, and falling asset prices, has led to concerns over economic impact. The ASI argues that the exodus of millionaires harms the economy by reducing capital, international connections, and entrepreneurial activity. The report cites data from the ONS Wealth and Assets Survey and warns that the trend could mirror experiences in France, Austria, and the Netherlands. Tory business spokesman Andrew Griffith expressed concern over the loss of contributors to the tax base and job creation.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the decline in millionaires as a negative consequence of Labour's tax policies, particularly highlighting the threat of a wealth tax and the impact of high taxation on wealth creators. It emphasizes the potential economic harm and suggests that the current trajectory mirrors past,
Why factuality (85): The article cites the Adam Smith Institute (ASI) report and references the ONS Wealth and Assets survey as its data source. It provides specific numbers (442,000 millionaires, 7% decrease) and attributes the decline to factors like high taxation, wealth tax proposals, and changes in immigration poli
Why objectivity (65): The article takes a clear stance in favor of free-market policies and criticizes Labour's economic approach, using emotionally charged language such as 'haemorrhaging wealth' and 'misguided.' It also presents the ASI as an authoritative voice without acknowledging potential biases, leading to a one-
The IndependentIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 7511 days agoAcademics propose a 2% wealth tax on UK households with over £100 million in assets, estimating it could generate £10 billion annually. The proposal, led by Professor Gabriel Zucman and Ben Tippet, argues the tax would reduce inequality and align top earners with standard tax rates. It would target fewer than 1,000 households and require HMRC to assess assets like property, businesses, and art. The report criticizes past wealth taxes for being too broad and offering loopholes, advocating for a focused approach. Andy Burnham, Labour leader, has not ruled out the tax, acknowledging pressure to reform the system.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the wealth tax as a progressive reform aimed at reducing inequality, emphasizing its potential to generate significant revenue and ensure fairness. It highlights academic support and Labour Party considerations, suggesting a left-leaning perspective. While it acknowledges past tax
Why factuality (80): The article accurately describes the state of the social care system in England, referencing Burnham's past attempts at reform and the current challenges. It aligns closely with the BBC source, discussing the need for systemic change and the role of unpaid carers.
Why objectivity (75): The tone is informative and balanced, presenting the issue without strong ideological leanings. It focuses on the practical aspects of reform without overtly favoring one political perspective.
Novara MediaIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 709 days agoOver 100 UK-based millionaires, including celebrities like Gary Lineker and figures such as Richard Curtis and Gary Stevenson, have signed a letter urging Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham to implement a wealth tax on the richest individuals. The initiative, organized by the Patriotic Millionaires UK, proposes a 2% annual tax on wealth exceeding £10 million, which could generate £24 billion annually for public services. The group also supports reforming capital gains tax to align it with income tax, potentially raising another £12 billion per year. Signatories argue that taxing accumulated wealth rather than earned income would ensure fairness while addressing rising inequality. Burnham has not dismissed the idea of a wealth tax and has previously considered inheritance taxes to fund social care. Gary Stevenson, a former city trader and advocate for the campaign, emphasized the urgency of tackling growing economic disparities.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the perspectives of wealthy individuals and their advocacy for a wealth tax, alongside Burnham's openness to considering such measures. It includes direct quotes from both supporters and critics of the proposal, providing balanced representation of the debate without overtly sla
Why factuality (75): The article discusses the letter from millionaires to Burnham, referencing the Patriotic Millionaires group and their call for higher taxes. It aligns with the BBC source on the general topic but lacks depth on the broader implications of the social care crisis or Burnham's reform plans.
Why objectivity (70): The tone is supportive of the millionaires' initiative, highlighting their willingness to pay more. It frames the request as a civic responsibility, which could be seen as subtly endorsing the idea.
Daily MirrorIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 709 days agoA group of 120 UK-based millionaires, including football legend Gary Lineker, have called on new Prime Minister Andy Burnham to implement a wealth tax on the ultra-rich. Organized by the Patriotic Millionaires group, the letter argues that taxing wealth rather than income would generate significant revenue for public services. They propose a 2% tax on assets exceeding £10 million, which could raise £24 billion annually. The measure would impact fewer than 0.04% of the population and could fund major initiatives such as expanding free school meals, ending the housing benefit freeze, and increasing defense spending. The proposal highlights the potential financial benefits of targeting extreme wealth for public good.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the call for a wealth tax as a progressive stance, emphasizing fairness and social responsibility. It presents the wealthy as having a moral obligation to contribute more, aligning with leftist economic policies. The focus on reducing inequality and using wealth to fund public福利 (
Why factuality (75): The article discusses academic estimates of potential revenue from a wealth tax and references the report by Gabriel Zucman and Ben Tippet. It aligns with the BBC source on the broader topic of tax reform and Burnham's openness to the idea. However, it doesn't delve deeply into the social care crisi
Why objectivity (70): The tone remains neutral, presenting the academic findings without overt bias. It highlights the potential benefits of a wealth tax without strongly endorsing or opposing the idea.
Phys.orgIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 7010 days agoA report by researchers from King's College London, the Paris School of Economics, and the University of California, Berkeley suggests that implementing a 2% minimum annual tax on UK households with more than £100 million in wealth could generate approximately £10 billion by 2026. The proposal targets the wealthiest 0.001% of households, which currently hold 16% of the UK’s GDP in wealth. The tax would apply to wealth rather than income, addressing gaps in existing taxes like capital gains and inheritance tax. It would exempt households already paying 2% in taxes and aim to prevent tax avoidance through offshore residency. The report highlights that such a tax could significantly reduce the UK’s budget deficit and target wealth accumulation in sectors like finance, real estate, and land.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of the potential economic impact and administrative feasibility of the proposed tax, citing academic research without overtly endorsing or criticizing the policy. While the topic involves taxation of the wealthy—a politically sensitive issue—it does not use
Why factuality (75): The article reports on a study by academics from King's College London, the Paris School of Economics, and the University of California, Berkeley. It provides specific figures like £10 billion in potential revenue and mentions the number of affected households. While these numbers are presented as e
Why objectivity (70): The tone is informative but leans slightly towards supporting the idea of a wealth tax as a fairer system. Phrases like 'dramatically wealthier' and 'lower effective tax rates' imply a value judgment about wealth distribution, which introduces a slight bias.
The IndependentIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 659 days ago Voices: Poll: Should Andy Burnham introduce a wealth tax on Britain’s richest people?An opinion piece in The Independent presents a poll asking whether Andy Burnham, the new Prime Minister, should introduce a wealth tax on Britain's richest individuals. The article highlights support from notable figures like Gary Lineker and members of the Patriotic Millionaires UK group, who argue that the wealthy can afford to pay more. They propose a 2% levy on the wealthiest households, which could generate significant revenue. However, the article also notes criticism from Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride, who questions the government's ability to fund its spending promises without clear funding plans. The piece concludes by inviting readers to participate in a poll and share their views.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both arguments for and against introducing a wealth tax, featuring perspectives from supporters and critics. While it emphasizes the call for higher taxation of the wealthy, it also includes opposing viewpoints, such as the Conservative critique of fiscal responsibility. The phr
Why factuality (70): The article explains the concept of a wealth tax and mentions the proposed 2% levy on wealth over £10 million. It cites the Patriotic Millionaires and other groups, aligning with the BBC source on the general topic. However, it lacks specific details about the social care crisis and Burnham's immedi
Why objectivity (65): The article presents the wealth tax as a viable option, focusing on its potential revenue and implementation. It uses neutral language but implies that the tax is a necessary step, which could be seen as leaning towards supporting the idea.
The Guardian (UK)IndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 5511 days agoAcademics proposed a potential wealth tax targeting the UK's super-rich, suggesting it could generate up to £10 billion annually. This would involve a 2% minimum charge on households with over £100 million in wealth, impacting fewer than 1,000 of the country's richest families. The idea was presented to Andy Burnham, who is considering measures to 'make tax fairer' and fund improved public services. The proposal aims to ensure billionaires pay similar tax rates as others, reduce inequality, and increase revenue without broadly taxing millions. Experts argue that such a tax would be administratively feasible due to its focus on a limited number of high-net-worth individuals.
Bias read (Center): The article presents academic proposals and quotes from multiple experts without overtly favoring any political side. It discusses a policy suggestion in a balanced manner, focusing on economic arguments and potential implementation challenges without clear ideological bias.
Why factuality (70): The article introduces the concept of a wealth tax based on academic research and quotes Burnham's general statements about fairness and taxation. It aligns with the primary source's mention of Burnham's interest in making tax fairer but does not directly reference the social care reform discussion.
Why objectivity (55): The article presents the wealth tax idea as a viable solution but frames it in a positive light, suggesting it could address societal inequities. While it does not explicitly criticize Burnham, the emphasis on fairness and the potential benefits of the tax could be interpreted as subtly supporting t
Daily MailIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 5512 days ago Andy Burnham signals the return of the 50p top tax rate as he warns that help on the cost of living will have to be funded by the better offAndy Burnham, the newly appointed UK Prime Minister, has hinted at the possibility of reintroducing the 50p top tax rate as part of potential tax reforms aimed at addressing the cost-of-living crisis. While Labour's manifesto states it will not increase the current top tax rate beyond 45p, Burnham suggested the matter is still under consideration. He emphasized concerns over the impact of frozen tax thresholds since 2021, which have pushed more individuals, including low-income pensioners, into higher tax brackets. Burnham acknowledged the challenges of adjusting these thresholds, noting the financial constraints faced by the government. The tax freeze, initially implemented to cover pandemic-related costs, has led to increased taxation for many low-income households, though reinstating the 50p rate is projected to generate only modest revenue.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of Andy Burnham's comments regarding potential tax changes, including his acknowledgment of both the need for funding and the challenges associated with altering tax policies. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing.
Why factuality (70): The article closely follows the BBC source, accurately reporting Burnham's stance on the 'death tax' and his plans for social care reform. It includes relevant background on his previous proposals and the Conservative response, maintaining alignment with the primary source.
Why objectivity (55): The article maintains a balanced tone, presenting Burnham's position alongside the opposition from the Conservatives. While it highlights the controversy around the 'death tax', it does not overtly criticize Burnham's stance, keeping the focus on factual reporting.
BBC News (UK)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 65Objective 609 days agoA group of UK millionaires, including notable figures like former footballer Gary Lineker and music producer Brian Eno, have written to newly appointed Prime Minister Andy Burnham requesting increased taxation on the wealthiest individuals. The open letter, organized by the Patriotic Millionaires, argues that the ultra-rich can afford to contribute more to reduce inequality and promote a more balanced society. They propose a 2% tax on wealth exceeding £10 million and emphasize the need for 'devolution of wealth and power' from the richest to reinvest in communities. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch responded by welcoming the idea of voluntary donations. While Burnham has previously expressed openness to a wealth tax, the letter highlights growing pressure on policymakers to address wealth disparity.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the call for higher taxation on the wealthy as a moral and patriotic duty, emphasizing fairness and societal benefit. It portrays the millionaires as proactive contributors rather than opponents of taxation, which aligns with progressive values. The emphasis on reducing inequality
Why factuality (65): The article discusses the letter from millionaires to Burnham, referencing the Patriotic Millionaires group and their call for higher taxes. While it aligns with the BBC source on the general topic, it does not provide detailed context about the social care crisis or Burnham's broader reform agenda.
Why objectivity (60): The tone suggests a positive outlook on the millionaires' initiative, emphasizing their willingness to pay more. It frames the request as a civic duty, which could be interpreted as subtly endorsing the idea of taxing the wealthy.
Daily MirrorIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 609 days ago Six key points about UK wealth tax - including how money could be usedAn article discusses proposals for a wealth tax in the UK, highlighting support from figures like former TV presenter Gary Lineker and groups such as Patriotic Millionaires UK. The proposals include a 2% annual tax on wealth above £10 million, which could affect around 20,000 individuals. Other suggestions include a one-time 1% emergency tax on assets over £4 million and a 1% annual tax on assets over £10 million with a 2% rate on assets over £1 billion, as proposed by the Green Party. Supporters argue the tax could generate significant revenue, potentially funding NHS staffing and defense spending. Critics, however, question the feasibility of collecting such taxes, citing challenges in accurately assessing wealth and concerns that the ultra-rich might relocate overseas to avoid paying.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the wealth tax proposal as a progressive measure aimed at addressing inequality, emphasizing the ability of the ultra-rich to afford higher taxation while highlighting potential benefits for public services. The focus on taxing wealth rather than income suggests a left-leaning slt
Why factuality (65): The article repeats the content of the letter from millionaires to Burnham, aligning with the BBC source. It provides names of signatories and quotes from Gary Lineker, but lacks depth on the broader implications of the social care crisis or Burnham's reform plans.
Why objectivity (60): The tone is supportive of the millionaires' initiative, highlighting their commitment to a fairer society. It frames the request as a civic responsibility, which could be seen as subtly endorsing the idea of taxing the wealthy.
The IndependentIndependentProgressiveFactual 60Objective 559 days ago Patriotic Millionaires: The group behind the super rich demanding they pay more taxOver 120 British-based millionaires have publicly appealed to UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham to increase taxes on the wealthiest individuals to fund a 'better Britain.' The Patriotic Millionaires UK group argues that current tax policies disproportionately benefit the ultra-rich while neglecting working-class citizens. This initiative follows a similar movement in the U.S., which began after the 2008 financial crisis and focuses on addressing income inequality and political instability. The UK branch, operating independently but collaboratively with international counterparts, advocates for progressive taxation, reduced wealth influence in politics, and improved living wages. Notable endorsers include former footballer Gary Lineker and screenwriter Richard Curtis, who support a potential 2% tax on wealth exceeding £10 million.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the demand for higher taxes on the wealthy as a moral imperative for societal stability and fairness, emphasizing the need for progressive taxation and reducing the undue influence of wealth in democracy. It highlights the alignment with global movements advocating for wealth tax,
Why factuality (60): This article focuses on the Patriotic Millionaires group and their demands for higher taxes on the wealthy, which is not directly related to the main topic of social care reform discussed in the BBC source. It lacks direct connection to the core event and introduces unrelated information about the g
Why objectivity (55): The article presents the millionaire petition as a significant political development, implying urgency and moral obligation. It uses emotionally charged language like 'demanding they pay more tax' and emphasizes the 'super rich,' which could be seen as biased toward the narrative of wealth inequalit
The IndependentIndependentCenterFactual 30Objective 506 days ago Voices: ‘No loopholes’: Readers demand watertight wealth tax after millionaires’ letter to Andy BurnhamOver 100 British-based millionaires, including football legend Gary Lineker, have written to Prime Minister Andy Burnham urging increased taxation of their wealth, arguing that the wealthy 'can afford it.' Independent readers overwhelmingly supported a wealth tax, with nearly 80% agreeing, though many emphasized the need to close tax loopholes first. Commenters called for measures such as exit taxes, stricter reporting requirements, and licensing of tax advisors to prevent evasion. Some suggested that millionaires could voluntarily donate to HMRC rather than rely on legislation, while others criticized the government's spending priorities. The discussion highlights growing public pressure for a fairer wealth tax system.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the debate around wealth taxation, featuring both calls for reform from the wealthy and public opinion. While the issue is politically charged, the framing remains neutral, presenting arguments from multiple perspectives without overtly favoring either side. S
Why factuality (30): The article contains minimal factual information related to the primary source document. It focuses on a letter from millionaires to Burnham about wealth taxation, which is unrelated to the core topic of social care reform discussed in the primary source. There is little alignment with the actual co
Why objectivity (50): The article presents a biased perspective favoring wealth taxation without providing balanced coverage of the broader social care reform discussion. It emphasizes reader opinions rather than presenting objective facts about the situation.
United Kingdom
